LongHC wrote:

I didn't know the solution for this question ?,I found it on some forum, they say its right A man has 3 sons, the product of their ages is 36, the sum of their ages is equal to the number of the building he lives in , the eldest son's eye is blue. FIND THE AGES OF THE THREE SONS Any one have a clue ?

There is obviously not enough information to solve the problem, at least not in a way to find a single definitive solution. The fact that the eldest son has a single eye is rather odd, but seems irrelevant.

Start simple. Use a new thread for each TCPClient. Actually, use one thread for the TCPListener to get new connections. On each new connection (TCPClient), invoke a new thread to handle it. When the TCPClient closes, you let the thread finish. In real world use, you'll find that this is very effective and a lot more scalable than you might at first think.

FYI: Borland is basing their next JBuilder on Eclipse.

I think it is incredibly usable, and I love the improvements to VB. I have to say, now I prefer VB to C#. There are some bugs, and Microsoft has a couple of hot fix packages that you can get if you call the support line. As a long time user of Java and Java IDEs, you get used to incredibly bloated IDEs that perform like molasses. The current VS 2005 may be slower than the previous version, but if you compare it to any Java IDE on the same machine, it screams (and it does more than the previous version). I would also like to say that at least for me, the full support for Generics alone makes this worth the upgrade. And the fact that these are true generics, not just compile time type checks like in Java (what the heck was Sun thinking?), just impresses the heck out of me.

Hey, isn't Bush funded by money from big oil? Do you think maybe, just maybe, the cost of gasoline has risen so high in order to fund the 2004 Bush campaign? Kinda makes you think, don't it?

Look, the guy is out of a job. He is trying to sell a book. The publicity is a gold mine for his book, and it could help him get back in the good graces of the Democratic party, who will be looking for high level people in the counterterrorism business if Kerry wins in November. Who in Washington puts themselves on the line when there is not some kind of personal gain involved?

Clinton did not take appropriate action to protect the United States from acts of terrorism. He bombed an aspirin factory in response to the USS Cole attack. He retreated from the Sudan as soon as lives were lost. It might be said, because of this, that Clinton is responsible for dozens of murders. If you don't by the incompetence and inaction argument, then take Bosnia. Many Bosnians were killed as a result of US actions. It might be said, because of this, that Clinton is responsible for dozens of murders. If you believe that Bosnia was justified, then you probably also believe that Iraq was justified. After all, we didn't really even have a national interest in going into Bosnia. It was just the right thing to do. In Iraq, there was potentially a lot at stake, and there was a great humanitarian need to depose a cruel dictator, just as in Bosnia. So you could say that although there were murders involved, these helped to save the lives of countless others, and improve the lives of millions of people. Of course, if you don't buy the "you have to break some eggs to make an omellet" argument... Wait, what were we talking about again?

That's how it works. .NET applications running from network drives run in a sandbox. The easiest way to work around this is to copy the command line program to the local hard drive where you want to run it. If that is not acceptable, you will have to muck around with .NET security policies, and decide the best way to grant full permissions. There is a bit of a learning curve, so if you can just copy to the local drive, you will be better off!

Let's say you are doing a query, and it returns a zillion rows. I would like to be able to process rows ad-infinitum, until I say "Stop." With Web Services, everything is wrapped inside a SOAP envelope. That is, it is a single chunk of information. I have to pass the whole SOAP document before any of it can be translated on the client. Right? I read something about buffered and non-buffered Web Service methods, but don't you have to have the whole XML SOAP document before you can begin processing it? What I would like to do is (A) send a request to run a query, and (B) get back maybe 50 rows at a time, each in a self contained SOAP document. The server would keep pushing out rows until I dropped the connection. Is this sort of thing even possible with Web Services? I know you can do this with the Web Services SP2 Technology Preview using SOAP messaging over TCP. In that case, it is pretty trivial. You just pump the data out in packets over the TCP link and translate on the client. But unless I am mistaken, using SOAP over TCP is not really a bonafide Web Service. I'd really like to know if anyone knows how to do this sort of thing with a Web Service. Or is this like trying to raise server events from HTTP: "You can't get there from here." Thanks.

The version of Java that Microsoft put out was so compatible that you could compile your Java class files and run it on a Solaris box. And it would run flawlessly. The only part that would not work was any part that used the com.ms.whatever packages, and if a developer is too stupid to realize that com.ms is a Microsoft-specific package, then he should be flogged!

String may be sealed simply because it is a "special" object. The .NET runtime does some things with strings internally that you can't do by using a String object, mostly in the name of efficiency. For instance, a "mutable" String is used inside the StringBuilder class, producing a much more efficient implementation. Change the implementation of String, and you don't just get errant code - you might get GPFs, memory leaks, or corrupted memory.

My 2 year old daughter touched the scanner on the way through, which sent it off, so she had to be scanned and patted. Makes me feel all safe knowing we don't have to worry about 2 year old suicide ... uh, make that "homicide" bombers. :-)

How do you mark a file for deletion on reboot? I didn't know you could do that! Do tell!

He could use something like VMWare. I use it all the time to test installations and to keep fresh demos of software I have developed (so it does not get corrupted by other software). Of course, in order to run a virtual computer, you have to set aside enough RAM to run the computer, and startup takes a while. Just curious...why write a virus checker like this? Many viruses don't go off until a certain date, so they would not affect the virtual machine in any way until the correct date. Others only corrupt machines randomly. Still others don't corrupt the machine, but use the machine as a launching point in order to spread. With a virtual machine, you would have just let this virus onto your network. This reminds of of Turing Machine theory and complexity theory. It is provable that no program running in finite time can determine if another, arbitrary program will stop executing. In other words, it is awfully difficult to construct an algorithm that can detect a virus automatically.