Your original thread in Lounge itself has gathered enough responses. Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson

This is a good solution and might work. Thank you very much. Have you used this and if so, I assume it has worked for you? Regards, Frank

Rob, Thank you for you reply. I appreciate it. This is what I ended up doing right after posting this. I'm sorry, I should have mentioned it. I was hoping for a more elegant solution. But this works, so I will continue to use this. Again, Thank You. Regards, Frank V. http://www.TheOpenSourceU.com

Jawz-X wrote: Anyway, I appreciate your post however that doesn't answer my question.... depends on your definition of "additional suggestions" I considered it "additional" to recommend eliminating consideration of non-standard solutions suggested by other people. :) "Just about every question you've asked over the last 3-4 days has been "urgent". Perhaps a little planning would be helpful?" Colin Angus Mackay in the C# forum led mike

Jawz-X wrote: I need to simulte a fresh boot cycle An interesting idea, but I am not aware of any such approaches. Best, Jun

Jawz-X wrote: But why then are cursors to be considered a last resort? Because they are increadibly slow. I once saw a question on this forum complaining that the code was taking too long (it was using cursors). I suggested a better query to use without cursors and the operation took around one second to complete. Some things cannot be solved without cursors which is why they exist. But oftentimes the code can be re-written without cursors. "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." --Charles Babbage (1791-1871) My: Website | Blog

I found the answer On asp:BoundField you can set a property to disable this feature. IE: HtmlEncode="False" Thanks!