A TD is not going to fall below another TD, it is what makes it a table.   The TDs are shrinking down to the smallest they can go.   As an alternative try using DIV tags I think it will get you a bit closer to what you are looking for. <div>       <div style="float: left;">          <select name="_ctl26" id="Select1" class="control">             <option selected="selected" value="entity_name">Name</option>             <option value="DS_mnem">DS Mnemonic</option>          </select></div>       <div style="float: left;">          <span class='controlNameSeparator'></span>       </div>       <div style="float: left;">          <select name="_ctl27" id="Select2" class="control">             <option value="Contains">Contains</option>             <option value="Equals">Equals</option>             <option value="StartsWith">Starts With</option>             <option value="DoesNotContain">Does Not Contain</option>          </select></div>       <div style="float: left;">          <span class='controlNameSeparator'></span>       </div>       <div style="float: left;">          <input name="_ctl28" type="text" id="Text1" class="border" maxlength="75" onkeydown="return event.keyCode==13?OnExplorerSearchClick():true" /></div>       <div style="float: left;">          <span class='controlNameSeparator'></span>       </div>       <div style="float: left;">          <span class="controlLabel">Currency Equals</span>          <span class='controlNameSeparator'></span>          <select

Part of learning ASP.net is also about having a good understanding of basic web practices (in my opinion) that you can learn at www.w3schools.com but I also use www.asp.net a lot too. John

Can you show the code for your table and are you using CSS. John

I don’t think you can put a table inside a link, it is not a standard (W3C) so browsers will translate it differently. Instead put your link in your cell. Then perhaps use a style to make it not look like a link. <table border="1"> <tr> <td> <a href="http://www.codeproject.com" style="text-decoration:none; color:Black; display:block;"> This is my news letter </a> </td> </tr> </table> [This is my news letter](http://www.codeproject.com) PS.. If you are trying to trick the end user to go to your site, many of them now require you to hold down a button to follow the link. John

I am not sure how you are passing the binary type to the sp, I am guessing it is in error because you are passing a string to a binary field. Either convert it to binary when passing it to the sp or do a CONVERT(binary(16), @password) I don’t believe the SQL stage is the place where you want to build you cryptology, the application should send you a encrypted string. PS.. I assume this is MS SQL Server John

I have been with www.JodoHost.com since 2004 and have been pretty happy with them. Good support and fairly flexible. I have been tempted to change because I did not want to use the EMS Sql Lite tool and when they upgrade databases (say 2000 to 2005) and you want to use the newer, you will have to create a new account (set everything up and then close the old one). On the other hand they communicate well about server upgrades/maintenance and the price is right for what I need. I don’t know about the HTTP handlers, I have never tried but I think you could if you do it in the web.config file.

I would lean towards a SP, that is what I use on all reports. If you decide to use SP, I would suggest that you would use a SP in each of your reports. This makes working with reports especially nicer if you are working with Infoview/Business objects. The only downside that I can think of is the limitation of is passing multiple values in a parameter from Crystal to the SP, a work around is to parse a comma separated strings. I don’t care to have a Crystal Record selection with a SP it seems redundant and a waste of resources. I can probably think of quite few pros for using a SP but I will just list a few: 1. You have more control of data result, there are many data routines that just is not efficient to try to do in one query statement. 2. You separate your data logic from your report design. Many time I will provide the data and someone else will write the report. 3. If you decide that you don’t like Crystal anymore and you will likely have an easier time with a conversion. 4. You control how the query is written thus if you have performance issues later you can adjust the query without even opening the report. 5. Without go in situations, you also can have a Crystal report execute a SP and that SP updates other tables. I hope this helps John