Hearing him will be enough. Although I can't abide the man in the person(he seems to think because he is a comedian he needs to make people laugh and fails miserably) although some of his films I have been able to bear him.

I think that date might be a mistake it appears on other sites[^] today. It appears that wizard linked to an old story and that the story has resurfaced today because Robin Williams :( has been confirmed in it and the other pythons only have minor roles. :sigh:

I liked the flat bottom on the iron though made it slide around the board easily.

I think leaving it open to a web-vote it was obvious the Cat would win. I liked the idea of a robot.

Yes and many names before that. Just do the needful.

Can you do the needful then?

glennPattonWork wrote:

don't expect it to lift anything more than dust, crumbs & the odd peanut, set the limits short.

glennPattonWork wrote:

and ate a SCART lead.

:confused:

Jörgen Andersson wrote:

When to buy one and when not.

I didn't buy her she was free.

Jörgen Andersson wrote:

What's the usual problems?

She doesn't listen. She's unpredictable. Prone to malfunction once a month.

Jörgen Andersson wrote:

What brand/model and why?

She could be a model I'll give her that and she likes all the designer brands.

Has anybody done the needful yet?

3000 you say? My oh my.

Get over yourself.

The wiki link no worky.

:thumbsup:

Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

tax breaks for married couples were abolished here in the UK.

I'm confused most of the other commenters in this thread are indicating there are Tax Breaks for marriage?

Wrong![^] See I told you you make a mistake. :laugh:

Keith Barrow wrote:

this is the sort of nonsensical rant I expect from the BNP,

It's not about the actual law being passed, it's about the way it was passed, without mandate and the timing of it. The whole thing stinks.

Because you don't have kids, you have a smaller house, your bills are less, you get to do what you want and you're happier so we have to make you sad somehow.

Dalek Dave wrote:

But I admire your empirical example of an epistemological epistle.

I'm going to need to google about 50% of those words before I understand that sentence. (By the way you still haven't fixed the league TPFKAPB and Jimmy Savile points should be combined :) )

It looks like a man but has the name of a woman so I'm stumped.

My point, exactly. Of course they could get 'married' before in a Civil Partnership at a Registry Office but that wasn't good enough. Now they can get married in an establishment that preaches against them.