Yeah, because Snopes is the ultimate bastion of truth. :rolleyes:
Jon Betzold
Posts
-
Why MS skipped #9 and went to #10 -
Extension Methods - Satan's favourite construct (controversial to nerds)I hear crickets...
-
VS 11Don't like it. Too gray. Boring.
-
Goosh"Goosh it"? :confused:
-
This is the best IPCC report I have seen yet;Here you will find an enlightening counter-point. http://www.junkscience.com[^] One should always thoughtfully consider both sides of an argument.
-
Where is Mathew Hall?Does anyone know whatever happened to Mathew Hall? He is the creator of two of the best works found on CP: XPTable[^] and XPExplorerBar[^]. He stopped posting replies for those two projects back in late 2005.:confused:
-
Can't open listening socket on Win2k3 ServerWin2k3 requires a listening socket to be bound to a specific IP, whereas Win2k and NT4 do not. We were not binding to a specific IP. One small change, and the code works on all 3 operating systems. Jon
-
Can't open listening socket on Win2k3 ServerI can't seem to open a listening socket on Windows Server 2003. The very same code has run on NT4 and Win2k for years. But when I try to run it on Win2k3, it fails to create a listening socket. The code is a C++ wrapper for the Windows Socket API (MFC Socket classes are mostly useless). I don't believe there is anything unusual about the way the code was implemented. It has never given us any trouble in the past. I guess my question is this: Is there something more that I must know/do in order to run a socket server (i.e. listening socket) on Win2k3. Is this part of MS's Secure Computing Initiative. Or am I just overlooking the obvious? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jon
-
VB.NET is gonna rule!!!Amen! Jon