The problem may be to do with your use of GetTime(int). The documentation of this states "Gets the value of the specified column as a System.TimeSpan object". Im thinking what you actually want is GetDateTime(int). However, as with my post above, if all you need is a string, then use GetString(int)

hey, thanks a lot .. this type of initialization worked for me ... testlib::testlibControl *tmp1[] = __gc new testlib::testlibControl*[10]; tmp1[i] = new testlib::testlibControl; tmp1[i]->Location = System::Drawing::Point(x,y); tmp1[i]->Size = System::Drawing::Size(24, 29); Thanks, Kranti

2beeIn addition i would like to point out, that it would be more secure to use parameters when constructing dynamic SQL statements. Just to add to Tobias' quoted comment, SQL Injection can be a big problem. For instance, a user can "inject" a DELETE statement into your programmically built SQL string and do some serious damage. Using parameters, SQL injection is impossible.

The same line with prototype of the function, is creating problems for the variable config of type CConfig. -- modified at 0:02 Tuesday 7th March, 2006

hey, it worked! :) Thanks a lot! Kranti

In ur case lifetime of the object of class2 is within the class1::put().To check this u can define the destructor of class2 and check it never say die

Here's one way: char szBuff[5] = {0}; _ultoa(1234, szBuff, 10); char szTemp[32]; strcpy(szTemp, "The number is "); strcat(szTemp, szBuff); "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain "There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb