Actually, your analogy is not very good. The difference is the that the luxury items that wealthy people spend their money on does not always rate well in its utility. A vehicle has a function, so does good food, haircuts, and other things we use on a daily basis. The T.V. is questionable because it can be used for a purpose that is constructive and beneficial, or not. A 50 million dollar home that is dangling off the side of a mountain is not very utilitarian. There is a case to be made for some of the luxury items that wealthy people spend their money on, such as expensive clothes, but it is the excesses that I think most people have a problem with. I think that, in general, people get paid in proportion to the size of the problem that they solve. While software is everywhere, and the world would be less efficient without it, there are a lot of people that can do it. Far more people than can run a company, especially one that leads an industry. The flip side of that is that people are getting paid even when they run the company into the ground, that is the kind of crap that makes people want to riot. I think it is the double standard that people really have a problem with.
Ben