.

!

The message link is now pointing to the article. It would probably be a good idea to remove it. :) "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

Yea what Holmes said, who cares about its release date... I would find this enjoyable on any given Friday :)

I would like to see rankings based on rendering times on a 10 year old client. It drives me nuts when I come across a website so full of Javascript goodness that it is a slow as muck, resulting in it being unusable. With response times of the order of 30 seconds to basic UI interactions, it means that your start to enter some text when suddenly the web page reloads with something completely different, as there was an extra mouse click buffered somewhere. Its particularly annoying when the page could just as easily have been implemented in good old fashion CGI, but was implemented using AJAX for trendiness reasons.

Gone What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question? The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism. Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???

Regarding the 2 answer you're right, but regarding the third one take a look at that sample. Notice the using statements, this is why I mentioned that it directly or indirectly spams to a same vendor.

Article already closed. Final kick delivered to member

The rude thing is to send a LMGTFY link as if I'm a person that does not know how to use google. Was it not easier just to say google it or send me google's link or send me an actually link to a proper resource? You actually made an effort to create and send a LMGTFY link instead. Also another thing, just like with this message now, you're too fast on answering things without giving it any thought. Again as I mentioned and shown you before your definition of spam differs from what is generally considered a spam. That referenced message shows you that you treated something that is a spam by definition (and actually by CP rules) as if it was not. Actually after that discussion that I had with you I noticed on few occasions the reporting of duplicated content which was of course removed by CP members. So the conclusion is that, even worse, you got the wrong idea of what the CP members actually think is a spam. But the main point here is, and I really don't understand how you're not getting this, when I gave you what you gave me just now then you rejected it, you literally said "I would not".

10th kick applied. "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

gone M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Gone A guide to posting questions on CodeProject Click this: Asking questions is a skill. Seriously, do it. Dave Kreskowiak

gone M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Gone A guide to posting questions on CodeProject Click this: Asking questions is a skill. Seriously, do it. Dave Kreskowiak

Gone while (true) { continue; }

Everything's gone apart from this message[^], which doesn't have the option to flag it as spam. :doh: However, if you go to the current version of the article[^], the flag does appear. Looks like a bug to me. "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

Gone A guide to posting questions on CodeProject Click this: Asking questions is a skill. Seriously, do it. Dave Kreskowiak