Yes. I was able to fix this issue. The above code was correct, the only exception of "File was closed" was giving me trouble. Fixed it by keeping the file stream opened while sending(SMPTPClient.send()) the email. Thanks for the help.

If you're using it from code, yes. But OG's suggestion was to use WinZip to manually compress the files, to see how much compression could reasonably be expected. I was just pointing out that you don't need to pay for a tool to do that. :) "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

You can overload the standard Array.sort() in the same manner as a standard comparative operation. The problem that you have is that your rows are not properly formatted for JSON (it looks like your data value should be an object, not an array) and you're mixing strings and integers. If you ONLY want to group by 1 field that's easy, if you want flexibility then you'll have a more complicated operation on your hands. One sort function will not be suitable for your needs, since string comparisons in Javascript will give you wonky results when used on stringified numbers, and using numerical comparisons on strings will also give bad data. Array.prototype.sort() - JavaScript | MDN[^] has a bunch of suggestions for how to handle sorting of various data types and uses vanilla Javascript.

The question here is why do you want every one of your DLL instances to write in the same log? Why not have each instance of your DLL write to a different log? And besides, this probably makes more sense - since each app using your DLL will have its own workflow. Best, John -- Log Wizard - a Log Viewer that is easy and fun to use!

I see nothing wrong with a static property, so long is its setter is protected by a mutex of some sort, which could be as simple as a lock ( object ) statement, where object is a private static object in the same class. (To avoid a deadlock, the object that gets locked must be separate from the property being set.) This is standard practice for a lazy initialized Singleton.

400 value is in example. I came up with those numbers to explain what I am trying to achieve. Actually, I did figure this out. Thanks.

Sure... Will do that...

Thanks for the reply. I also didn't like the idea. :)

Thanks a lot for the help.

Thanks for the suggestions and advise.

Hi, you need to excape the xml string, refer below links it should help. system.security.securityelement.escape[^] http://www.bensonthomaslive.net/1/post/2009/08/escape-xml-string-characters-in-c.html[^]

Thanks for the advise and suggestions.

You implementation force Class 1 and 2 to implement "hello(var1, var2,var3)" just because you want to have a extra method for Class 3. This is not a good design to follow. You should follow Open to extend and close to modification methodology. you might create an extension of class A and implement it for Class 3. Please refer the approach below: abstract class A { public abstract void hello(var1, var2); // This will be only for class 1 & class 2 (Existing function) } abstract class A1 : A { public abstract void hello(var1, var2, var3); // Want to make this available for class 3 only. (Want to add this new function) } Implement Class A for Class 1 and Class 2 Implement Class A1 for Class 3 Maddy

Apart from what ever has been answered it is a good practice to catch the general exception also. In both the catch blocks you have to do 2 things log an exception as well as Display the exception to the user. But my suggestion is if you can avoid exceptions that would be even better so have proper checks where ever required like null check etc etc.

You're welcome! Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

I considered that, but I don't think so. Of course, the situation is unclear.

Thanks for your help. I was able to solve it. Following is what I ended up with: byte[] decoded = Convert.FromBase64String("UUEncoded string to be decoded"); String value = ASCIIEncoding.ASCII.GetString(decoded); int output = Convert.ToInt32(value); // Convert int to hex format and reverse the byte String.Format("{0:X02}{1:X02}{2:X02}", (output & 0x0000FF) >> 0, (output & 0x00FF00) >> 8, (output & 0xFF0000) >> 16);