I've done quite some work with the richTextBox control that was included with .NET 2003 (so this comment doesn't apply to the 2005 version) and I can tell you that it doesn't support syntax highlighting by itself. Actually the .NET component is actually a wrapper for the good old COM-based pre-.NET RichEdit32 control. Those being said, what you could do is you could use the text changed event of the control and create your own interpretation class that you could feed the content of the control. The interpretaion class would then run through the text and *interpret* (that is, set formatting options for certain areas of the text) and set the text property of the component to the *interpreted* text. This is a solution although it may become slow as the density of the text increases. You may consider optimizing it by making a *wise* run-thtough by examinig what type of changes the text suffered... Good luck!

You could use the CLR Profiler[^].

excuse me, what u mean for base class? System.Windows.Forms??? thanks in advance Paolo

Check out the ISensNetwork interface. "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow

You could do something like this: namespace MyNamespace { public class Exception : System.Exception { } public class Foo { public void Bar() { try {} catch (MyNamespace.Exception e) {} } } } However, you really should not do it like this. Instead use a self-explanatory name for your exception class that ends with Exception (just as an example: XMLProcessingException). For details on using exceptions see Class Naming Guidelines[^], Best Practices for Handling Exceptions[^] and Using User-Defined Exceptions[^]. Best regards Dennis

Localhost should work anyway. but try to assign a static IP. - Anders My Photos WDevs - The worlds first DSP, free blog space, email and more. Now also with forums :)

I wrote a simple window application that fills a treeview with registry keys. The code fills the tree with the registry keys (no values) private void FillNode(TreeView treeView, TreeNode parentNode, RegistryKey key) { int index = key.Name.LastIndexOf("\\"); string keyname = key.Name; if (index > 0) { keyname = key.Name.Remove(0, index + 1); } TreeNode node = null; if (null == parentNode) { node = treeView.Nodes.Add(keyname); } else { node = parentNode.Nodes.Add(keyname); } string\[\] subkeyNames = key.GetSubKeyNames(); RegistryKey subkey = null; foreach (string subkeyName in subkeyNames) { try { subkey = key.OpenSubKey(subkeyName); } catch (SecurityException e) { // Ignore keys that we don't have security to read them continue; } FillNode(treeView, node, subkey); subkey.Close(); } } To use it call: FillNode(treeView1, null, Microsoft.Win32.Registry.CurrentUser); Where treeView1 is your TreeView control. Notes: 1. If you read the keys them use OpenSubKey and not CreateSubKey 2. Make sure you catch exception. There are keys you cannot open. 3. Don't forget to close keys that you open. Good luck, Ami

hm. thats possible. why not?) CreateFile with GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE access. read about CreateFile more carefully, i'm not saying smth that is not in common-access documentation. 4apai There're no impossible tasks. There're tasks that required infinite period of execution time.

Paolo Ponzano wrote: generate a random number on 4 bytes Do you mean that the range of random random numbers should span values that fit in 4 bytes? If so, you could just use rand() after seeding it with a random (or as random as you can get) int. /ravi My new year's resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | Freeware | Music ravib@ravib.com

See WTL for MFC Programmers, Part V[^], I have an example of using the WTL hyperlink class in that article --Mike-- Personal stuff:: Ericahist | Homepage Shareware stuff:: 1ClickPicGrabber | RightClick-Encrypt CP stuff:: CP SearchBar v2.0.2 | C++ Forum FAQ ---- Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so Brain, but if we shaved our heads, we'd look like weasels! "Kosh reminded me of some of the prima-donna programmers I've worked with. Knew everything but when you asked them a question; never gave you a straight answer."   -- Michael P. Butler in the Lounge

You have to parse the text yourself. If you feel the file will always be small, then i suggest you load it completely in 1 pass, then parse that memory chunk. Otherwise, you need to parse a little differently and take care not only of \n but also of when you reached the end of the buffer and have to reload another segment. Hope this gives you a hint.

Have you tried just debugging the DLL in question? That is set the DLL to active project / startup project then when prompted for the executable choise the appropriate executable that uses the DLL. Ant. I'm hard, yet soft. I'm coloured, yet clear. I'm fruity and sweet. I'm jelly, what am I? Muse on it further, I shall return! - David Williams (Little Britain)

Hi, The problem is pretty straight forward. You are declaring UniqueId[16] and in memset you are using 24. Change it to memset(UniqueID, 0, 16); That should solve the problem. Regards, Mahadevan

A SAX-parser would probably be the best solution for you. They're fast and they don't require lots of memory. Parsing XML using SAX-parsers is kind of like recursive descent parsing if I'm not mistaken. When the parser finds an element <img, it'll call your callback, notifying you of that. Then when it finds href="img", it'll call your callback notifying you of that. So, basically you need two (possibly three) callbacks. One for notifying you that you've <img has begun, one that tells you href="img" was found, and possibly one that says </img>. Here's one such parser: libxml2[^]. It's licensed under the MIT License, so there's no problem using it in a closed source/commercial application. -- Ich bin Joachim von Hassel, und ich bin Pilot der Bundeswehr. Welle: Erdball - F104-G Starfighter

I doubt your problem is the CPU. Anyway, try removing or correcting this line. It is incorrect: strncpy((wav)->filename,argv[1],strlen(argv[1])); Should be: strncpy(wav->filename,argv[1],sizeof(wav->filename)-1); Bikram Singh

I take it you mean each step is running on its own thread? Semaphores dont help you gaurentee order. All the do is protect say thread A accessing the same thing as thread B. Which order thread A and thread B run in is down to the scheduler. So it might happen A grabs the semaphore, B tries to and waits, A releases semaphore, B contnues to run. Or it might happen B grabs the semaphore, A tries to and waits, B releases semaphore, A contnues to run - its up to the scheduler (and of course your theads priority). If you want things to happen one after the other, run them on the same thread: void Foo( { Step1(); Step2(); Step3(); } etc. If you really want each step to happen on it's own thread, then you need to use events. Look up CreateEvent/SetEvent/ResetEvent If I have the wrong end of the stick, and what you are asking is you want ShellExecuteEx not to return until the spawned process has finished, you do it like this. SHELLEXECUTEINFO si; si.fMask = SEE_MASK_NOCLOSEPROCESS; si.etc etc ShellExecuteEx(&si); WaitForSingleObject(si.hProcess, INFINATE);