Whenever I hear someone describing a city as beautiful I have to wonder have they ever been outside of a city. I fear these are the same people who call gilt edging and purple drapes tasteful. Not that cities don't have their charms, and as a city boy I much prefer living in a city than a town, but beauty is not the word I would use. Some people say it is the concentrated humanity that is the beauty of it and I too like to be amongst the bustle of a energised city, but it's not beautiful. It's not that nature is always beautiful and right, I just think we are fooling ourselves when we call 443 meters of concrete "beautiful". I live in Dublin, a small city, and the majority of it is badly planned and poorly built. I've lived in Cape Town, a big, ugly city with a beautiful mountain in the middle of it. Durban city is just manky. Harare could do with realising it is in Africa and not Europe. London sprawls, Las Vegas boasts tastelessness, Athens destroys its history, Edinburgh looks best from Arthur's seat on a foggy day, Glasgow is downright medieval, Paris makes you too dizzy to notice the dirt, Windhoek has no charm, Johannesburg should be leveled, Bloemfontein makes me suicidal and Jakarta needs a biblical flood. I haven't been to New York but from the looks of it the best part is smack bang in the middle of Central Park on your back looking up at the sky.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.