Hey, Yeah im actually running it in the DocumentComplete event, its funny because it orks perfectly for some websites its just a couple it doesn't. I wonder if its something to do with XHTML or DHTML. It will work fine for ebay, yahoo and egg but won't work for nwolb or rbsdigital cheers Peter

Can't you simply download the image, save it locally and display it in the list view? The src attribute of the img tag holds the URL of the image, so you can simply download it using HttpRequest and then give the downloaded file path to the listview. Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Blog | My Articles | WinMacro

If you are reading my namespace extension article, keep in mind that a namespace isn't a drive. If you want an actual new drive letter, you'll need to write a device driver. --Mike-- Personal stuff:: Ericahist | Homepage Shareware stuff:: 1ClickPicGrabber | RightClick-Encrypt CP stuff:: CP SearchBar v2.0.2 | C++ Forum FAQ ---- Kosh reminded me of some of the prima-donna programmers I've worked with. Knew everything but when you asked them a question; never gave you a straight answer.   -- Michael P. Butler in the Lounge

Sort of pessimization, isn't it? I had a similar problem years ago at my first job. I was writing an input filter for Targa images. Targas have a case where you need to interpret blocks of data based on the value of their first byte. Naively, I coded is as "read a byte, read the chunk, read a byte, read a chunk." It took over a minute to process something like a 320x240 image (on a 386, of course, but still ridiculously slow). Changing to a buffered i/o mechanism reduced it to reasonable times. When I proudly told my boss of the speedup, he said, "So you really didn't optimize it, you just depessimized it." *jab* *deflate* "Uhh... yeah, I guess." :-) Tim Lesher http://www.lesher.ws

If you have created you CWnd derived control as a chile window of the CView, then as long as its visible and withoin the CView's client area then it should appear. Make sure when creating the control that the WS_CHILD and WS_VISIBLE style have been set. For example, in one of my apps, I create a list of controls like this: m\_Log.Create("Log window", WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | SS\_SUNKEN | SS\_CENTERIMAGE | SS\_NOTIFY| WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(10, 10, 100, 100), this, IDC\_EDIT1) ; m\_WhizWheel.Create("Wheel", WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | SS\_BITMAP | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(0, 0, 20, 20), this, IDC\_WHIZ\_WHEEL) ; m\_WhizWheel.SetBitmap(m\_WheelBitmap\[m\_BitmapIndex\]) ; m\_TrayProgress.Create(WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | PBS\_SMOOTH | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(10, 10, 15, 100), this, IDC\_TRAY\_PROGRESS) ; m\_SampleProgress\[0\].Create(WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | PBS\_SMOOTH | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(20, 10, 25, 100), this, IDC\_SAMPLE\_PROGRESS1) ; m\_SampleProgress\[1\].Create(WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | PBS\_SMOOTH | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(20, 10, 25, 100), this, IDC\_SAMPLE\_PROGRESS2) ; m\_SampleProgress\[2\].Create(WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | PBS\_SMOOTH | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(20, 10, 25, 100), this, IDC\_SAMPLE\_PROGRESS3) ; m\_SampleProgress\[3\].Create(WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | PBS\_SMOOTH | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(20, 10, 25, 100), this, IDC\_SAMPLE\_PROGRESS4) ; m\_ValveStatus.Create("?", WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(0, 0, 15, 15), this, IDC\_VALVE\_LED) ; m\_DadStatus.Create("?", WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(0, 0, 15, 15), this, IDC\_DAD\_LED) ; m\_LampStatus.Create("?", WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(0, 0, 15, 15), this, IDC\_LAMP\_LED) ; m\_DeviceStatus\[0\].Create("?", WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(0, 0, 15, 15), this, IDC\_DEVICE1\_LED) ; m\_DeviceStatus\[1\].Create("?", WS\_CHILD | WS\_VISIBLE | SS\_NOTIFY | WS\_CLIPSIBLINGS, CRect(0, 0, 15, 15), this, IDC\_DEVICE2\_LED) ; I then later on use MoveWindow() on each of the controls to place them exactly where I want them to be. Roger Allen Sonork 100.10016 I think I need a new quote, I am on the prowl, so look out for a soft cute furry looking animal, which is really a Hippo in disguise. Its probably me.

Create the exported object in the dll, then in the application change its value. There is NO other way to do it. The reason should be obvious -- if the application were allowed to export and object, then the application would always have to be running whenever the dll is running. Lets say you have A.exe that export and object which X.dll uses. B.exe also uses X.dll but has no need for the object. When B.exe runs, X.dll is brought into memory, and because the dll references the object that was exported by A.exe, A.exe must also be executed. One of the purposes of a dll is to share its data and functions among many different applications. It would be terribly inefficnent to do it the other way around.

Cheers Works buetifully Peter

MFC RTTI is older than standard C++ RTTI and is more limited and manual. If MFC does the call to IsKindOf when it crashes, then you may not ba able to replace it with C++ RTTI (dynamic_cast) as suggested in another reply. As an alternative, you may check your derivation order. Does your class first derives from the MFC class then from your class (which should probably not derives from CObject). If not, changing that may be a fix... It is possible that MFC RTTI rely on the fact that the derived class start at the same adress as the base class but I am not sure that there is such a restriction. It's just a guess. And does your class is properly defined for MFC RTTI uses? Maybe you should add some MFC macros in your derived class. I don't know... I think that it is optional as long as the information is not required. But maybe the problem is that the information is required by document templates to create the view. Philippe Mori

is there any data in it? To explain Donald Knuth's relevance to computing is like explaining Paul's relevance to the Catholic Church. He isn't God, he isn't the Son of God, but he was sent by God to explain God to the masses.    /. #3848917 Fractals!

Peter Liddle wrote: certain things that rely on the crypt libaries are undeclared identifiers Maybe you need to install Platform SDK.

No. Christian I am completely intolerant of stupidity. Stupidity is, of course, anything that doesn't conform to my way of thinking. - Jamie Hale - 29/05/2002

Thanks for the link. Nice site :-) Cheers, Joao Vaz A person who is nice to you, but rude to the waiter, is not a nice person - Natalie Portman (Padme/Amidala of Star Wars)

a Casa.Sapo.pt

Peter Liddle wrote: How can just passing a pointer to other functions cause an out of bound error    By having that function do something stupid with the pointer!    What Kind of error are you getting when you call delete[]?  And are you sure that all of the memory being freed with delete[] was alocated with new[]?    Peace! -=- James. "Fat people are hard to kidnap." (Try Check Favorites Sometime!)

Recover the error before anything else --before the call to AfxMessageBox in your case. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

See this article. /ravi "There is always one more bug..." http://www.ravib.com ravib@ravib.com

class AFX_EXT_CLASS CMyClass { ... } Cheers, Tom Archer Author, Inside C# Author, Visual C++.NET Bible A total abstainer is one who abstains from everything but abstention, and especially from inactivity in the af

Chris Losinger wrote: maybe i'm wrong. i hope so. i'd like to see what it's like. *grin* Well, I'd just presume that someone who asks if they need to delete something they did not allocate probably won't understand what 'allocate' means. Christian The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little. And you don't spend much time with the opposite sex working day and night, unless the pizza delivery person happens to be young, cute, single and female. I can assure you, I've consumed more than a programmer's allotment of pizza, and these conditions have never aligned. - Christopher Duncan - 18/04/2002

No. But if you haven't created your own copy c'tor and assignment operator a HANDLE wrapper class might use the compiler generated versions and then two object might try to release the same resoucrce when they are destructed.

Yeah, and i used it to write to a file with no problems. I also formated the message and viewed the last error and it says operation completed successfully Peter