You can put the LoadControls in Page_Load but with below condition : If(!IsPostback) LoadControls() This will cause the LoadControls to call only at the first loading of the page and not everytime postback occurs. IsPostBack property is used to check whether the page is getting loaded first time of the postback caused by any control on the page. Hope this helps. All the best. I quit being afraid when my first venture failed and the sky didn't fall down.

Richard, Thank you for your reply. Response.Redirect fixed the problem. And also many thanks to GenJerDan for explaining to me what caused the issue in the first place. Kind regards,

Rick van Woudenberg wrote: Weird huh ? No. It's called a race condition and is a common problem when novices try multi-threaded programming What are these threads doing? Are they trying to utilize the same resources? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1c9txz50.aspx[^] only two letters away from being an asset

I think you mean "extract" the value. Regular Expression. I'd use something like: "\[(?'Value'.*)\]"

Like I said, if dt.Rows[lastRow]["date"] is already a DateTime, you just have to assign it to lastTime. If it's not, remove the extra ToString(). You are welcome :) Also, if you think somebody helped you, please vote them a 5. It's a small pleasure ;) Cheers, Vıkram. I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every moment of it.

The TIME_WAIT state for a period of time is normal/default socket behavior. If you're absolutely sure all data is sent, then you may be able to set the LingerState to on/0sec: LingerOption lingerOption = new LingerOption (true, 0); client.LingerState = lingerOption; You also should call Close() on your NetworkStream :) Mark Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

unless you pass an instance reference to it... -Spacix All your skynet questions[^] belong to solved I dislike the black-and-white voting system on questions/answers. X|

I hadn't thought of that - much neater. For things like file paths it is useful to know about using @ as well. Chris

Hi Rick, ToString() when applied to numbers will by default use the regional settings of your system, which define a "decimal point" (not necessarily a period) and a "thousands separator" (not necessarily a comma). Parse() and TryParse() will observe the "decimal point" and ignore the "thousands separator". If you have a number formatted one way (say West-European way, with decimal comma, and thousands period) and parsed another way (say US way), you will get wrong results, and even an Exception when more than one thousands separator is present. The solution is NOT to replace periods by comma and vice versa, the solution is to apply the appropriate settings, by using a FormatProvider or CultureInfo. The above applies not only to doubles, but also to floats and decimals. :) Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Voting for dummies? No thanks. X|

You have an array and need to represent it in a ArrayList. Right ? You can use List<T>. byte[] yourArray = ...; List<byte> list = new List<byte>(yourArray); This will insert all the array elements to the list. To get items, you can iterate items on the list. All C# applications should call Application.Quit(); in the beginning to avoid any .NET problems.- Unclyclopedia How to use google | Ask smart questions

I would try "netstat -a -o -n | more" before you start your application and check that the 31009 port isn't already open.

Calling Show requires that the thread be running a message pump (like Application.Run). Replace _form.Show with _form.ShowDialog and it should work fine - ShowDialog is modal and runs its own message pump. Regards Senthil [MVP - Visual C#] _____________________________ My Blog | My Articles | My Flickr | WinMacro

:laugh: i think he was in hurry TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L %^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87??6?N8?BcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2 W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN% Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-i?TV.C\y -------------------------------------------------------- 128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can

Hi remove the semicolon on the following statement if (control.GetType() == typeof(TextBox)); then it should work Regards Srini

Hi Rick if (e.Node.Parent.IsSelected) { MessageBox.Show("This is the parent node"); } This piece of code doesn't make sense in the context of an AfterSelect handler. By definition e.Node is selected therefore it's parent, e.Node.Parent, is not and e.Node.Parent.Selected will always be false. AlanN

leppie wrote: I dont understand why people want to revert to monsters! OK - I now have an image of Scooby Doo in my head and it's not going away. Thanks for that. Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. My blog | My articles

Yup .. that's exactly what it does :D Weird huh ? The debugger tells me that it cannot open a CLR and that I have to repair my Framework 2.0. However, other programs debug, compile and run just fine, so I highly doubt if it's the framework that is broken.

Not sure but you may want to ask the author of the article... "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

Thank you all for you swift reply. Very true , new would create a new instance ( hence the name ). I can understand why this could be confusing. I will try to explain as good as I can why I would want this. I create a new array of points, which I add to a ObjectList. private void dataGridView_CellContentClick(object sender, DataGridViewCellEventArgs e) { foreach (DataGridViewRow SelectedRow in dataGridView.SelectedRows) { Points pt = new Points(); pt.AddPoint(X,Y); RenderableObjects.Objects.Add(pt); } } When I rerender the form, the points (X,Y) show on the screen. So everytime I click on a row in the datagridview, the method is called. However, everytime a new instance of Points() is added to the RenderableObjects list. But before adding the new X and Y point , I want the list to be cleared. This can be achieved by : RenderableObjects.Objects.Remove(pt); However you can't use this line in the same method, since a new reference is initiated and therefore the previous pt is not removed. My though was ( and it was just a though ) : If I could add a variable to the new reference, I could specifically filter, something like : = new Points(); pt[x].AddPoint(X,Y); RenderableObjects.Objects.Add(pt[x]); int y = x -1 ; RenderableObjects.Objects.Remove(pt[y]); x++; } } For obvious reasons , this code would not run 'cause you cannot use an array (x) size on a variable declaration. Like I said, it was just a thought. I hope I was able to clearify it a bit more. Cheers

So the mistake was to use square brackects; RemoveAt is a method, it needs parentheses. Furthermore, as soon as you remove an item, all the higher-numbered items get moved down one positition, so if you need to remove al but the first N items the correct code would be: for (int x = N; x < cmbtrackWhere.Items.Count; x++) { cmbtrackWhere.Items.RemoveAt(N); // yes, always the first you dont want any more! } This loop continues to remove the first unwanted item, until there are no more unwanted items left. There is of course the alternative to remove them in reverse order: for (int x = cmbtrackWhere.Items.Count-1; x>=N; x--) { cmbtrackWhere.Items.RemoveAt(x); } Of course, if you want to remove everything there is the Clear() method to do that. :) Luc Pattyn [My Articles] [Forum Guidelines]