But I am not using any WEB page , can I use (GridViewRow control ) for the desktop application aswell.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tst0kwb1.aspx[^] http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/mswnsk98/html/vbobjWinsockControl.asp[^]

Nishant Sivakumar wrote: fall-in-love-with-colleague Humm........ need some expert guidance on above:) "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV Support CRY- Child Relief and You

See Here[^] and Working with ADO and List View in MFC[^]_** **_ whitesky

Then there is one implementation for each. This is how multiple inheritance works in C++. Steve

See Here[^]and Here[^] and What is multiple inheritance? What are its advantages and disadvantages?[^]_** **_ whitesky

Assuming that you mean the remote side is sending you 40,000 bytes of data per second, and you want to store that data as a distinct row, then you probably need what's known as a BLOB field (Binary Long OBject). If memory serves, then you can only have one of these per row. Steve S Developer for hire

See Here[^] and Here[^]_** **_ whitesky

ThatsAlok wrote: BTW Who voted you down? Of course someone didn't like the suggestions that were given. I guess that is what voting is all about. ThatsAlok wrote: let me sort it out Thanks. :) Nibu thomas A Developer Programming tips[^]  My site[^]

Check this Link for the LifeCycle of a MFC Program http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/mfcprogflow.asp[^] Appu.. "If you judge people, you have no time to love them."

Pls refer Message Handling and Mapping section in MSDN

Hi !!! If you don't define copy constructor in your class, the compiler creates one automatically. YOu cannot prevent that the compiler creates one, but you can implement one with aan empty body. By !!! -:KNOX:-

Yes, that another way of doing it. Both techniques have their pro and cons. I remember having read an article that was discussing several singleton implementations but I don't remember the link. Yours is great when it has to be used 'alone' because as you said you don't have to worry about releasing the instance. But in some cases, this can lead to problems: if you have a singleton that is member of another singleton, then you get into trouble because you have no control over the timings of the destruction of the instances. In such case, you need to control yourself the scope of the instances. Cédric Moonen Software developer Charting control

Nibu thomas wrote: ok then it's "don't take tension..." Right? :) "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV

I take it your talking about VB.NET. It can be done using delegates. I dont have time to give you an example but there should be loads of information if you google. You can probably find some info in the articles here as well. Jon

NiLeSh KoRpE wrote: What are the different types of polymorphism? i believe two, Function Overloading and Operator Overloading[ I was Wrong]. anyways Mr Nilesh answer to these question can be find easily by reading book, why are you posting here for same! "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV -- modified at 5:22 Thursday 18th May, 2006

Hi !!! YOu haven't right.:zzz: By !!! -:KNOX:-

In addition to what Steve said, I should add that early-binding is much much faster than late-binding and is the only case to select (unless you HAVE TO use late-binding) for example when you don't have compile-time access to the COM...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_binding[^] "What classes are you using ? You shouldn't call stuff if you have no idea what it does" Christian Graus in the C# forum led mike