dandy72 wrote:

trigger

I do not think that means what you think it means.

Why is it so hard for you to explain it? That tells me that you do not even understand what you think you believe. Otherwise, you could explain it. You have responded several times but yet still cannot explain it. Doesn't that tell you something?

Elon did it.

They have settings for that type of stuff so it may be that you enabled it without knowing it or maybe it's on by default. Security is a pain.

dandy72 wrote:

This whole "nothing to hide/no worries" thing has been debated ad nauseam.

If that were true, then you should be able to list the dangers very quickly and succinctly. Well?

dandy72 wrote:

Kool-Aid you're apparently drinking.

:laugh: Right to the insults. :zzz:

Sorry, I thought you were being serious. Good day then.

What suspicions? Because I'm pretty sure you're wrong.

PIEBALDconsult wrote:

WINKEY

;)

Member 14840496 wrote:

Life insurance companies would love to have medical histories.

They usually ask for that anyway.

Member 14840496 wrote:

I get the feeling that some people in here have Google stock.

Everybody should. It performs very well.

No, they are a data company. They make data useful. Yes, they also run ads. No, google is a corrupt company. Stop assuming things.

dandy72 wrote:

fallacy

Why is it a fallacy? What do we have to worry about? If the threat is real then you should be able to quantify it.

Member 14840496 wrote:

, I am fairly confident that if YOUR medical history, or someone in your family's medical history got all over the internet, you would be the first to complain.

Why? Are you embarrassed by your medical history? If someone posted that you were treated for a heart attack on such and such a date and then had your tonsils out another date, then had gonorrhea on this date, etc., etc., I would not care. Why do you? And if someone did steal data they are going to steal millions of files so if they post millions of patients data the likelihood that anyone who knows you will see your data is very slim. Don't misunderstand, I am all for privacy, but if someone's health care data is leaked, I have zero interest in finding out what the leaked data is. You could not pay me to go looking at the stolen data.

Can you summarize?

Member 14840496 wrote:

Greed knows no bounds.

Data is google's business. It doesn't always have to be about greed.

Greg Utas wrote:

scrolling the mouse wheel while positioned over the "Look in:" drop-down menu

It does that on all dropdowns. That's been a feature forever.

As Victor said, there is no way anyone can help without knowing what the table structure is. Where are you stuck?

I've never noticed that and I use it all the time. You have a prankster in your office. :-D

All great companies started out with a scribble on a napkin. :-D

Humans are terrible at communication. We fill in too many blanks with our own experience and are often wrong. Just ignore those that do not help and make sure you are providing enough information for someone who can't see what you are doing to help you.