Rocky Moore wrote:
You seem to be in denial, this is functionality. With your logic I could say all programming is design issues.
Aparently you don't know the difference between design and functionality.
Rocky Moore wrote:
I am not talking about "basic" session state which even ASP classic had, in ASP.NET V2 it is much more flexible and it now not a great sin to use it!
You didn't mention flexibility. You asnwered a question saying what ASP.NET had something that PHP didn't. As such, you were hinting at PHP not having an equivalant when it does. Get your crap straight.
Rocky Moore wrote:
What a joke comparing server side includes which even ASP had back in the dark ages with with Maste Pages / Themes.
Once again, you're on crack. I didn't claim they were exactly the same. I did say however the same FUNCTIONALITY can be acheived. Perhaps if you pull the stick out of your ass you'll notice the difference.
Rocky Moore wrote:
This seems to show you really do not know much about ASP.NET 2.0 at all! Same goes with web controls, web user controls, web parts, etc..
Nice logic there.
Rocky Moore wrote:
From all the insults in your reply (not to mention attacking all CP users)
Call it want you want, most people on CP don't have clue about PHP but hate it anyway. Go home and whine to mommy if that hurt your feelings.
Rocky Moore wrote:
I guess I must have stepped on a sensitive spot.
Yeah, I'm tired of the stupidity here. You're doing a great job of reminding me of it.
Rocky Moore wrote:
Maybe some time spent with a couple good books on ASP.NET 2.0 and a little practice, might just help that problem..
Take you're own medicine. Also, I'm willing to bet I've studied more ASP.NET than you've studied PHP. Reply or don't reply, I don't care, you're a waste of my time. So this is my last post on this thread. Jeremy Falcon
