Well, why would I want them to? Would it bother me? No, .NET 2003 on XP Pro works nicely for me (I even reinstalled Studio 6) and I see no reason to upgrade. This whole business seems to be focussed primarily on creating new versions that just require more capacity without adding much, after all, every time a new version comes about we start processing files and the like while we did that 30 years ago allready. Where is the growth in the vertical direction? C'mon industry, stop reinventing the wheel over and over again and making us pay for it, create something that requires less capacity and that provides the blocks that were before and the blocks that were created with the previous version; that would be progress.

Yes, agreed on both getting old and quality detoriation of MSDN. Actually I am gong back to (call me whatever you whish) good old C and Basta!, nothing has really changed, the costs of upgrading has become too high with respect to the gains made. Yes, industry and business 'demands' it but that is their problem and theirs alone. Yes, I think I am getting older and hopefully a little wiser too.

Hack Windows Task Manager, posted recently contains a demo executable ready for download that is infected with a trojan. Be warned! The source is safe but the provided executable certainly is not.