Our Team build builds windows forms, web services and web applications that make up our product in one swoop. The team build just says get the entire folder structure from source control then build the specified solutions. Each solution/project then uses relative paths to any referenced dlls. By default all paths are relative if they are on the same drive. The team build does not need to specify the references as the project does that. If you have knowledge, let others light their candles at it. Margaret Fuller (1810 - 1850) www.JacksonSoft.co.uk

student_rhr wrote: I agree with you that BackgroundWorker is a bad idea that's why I was wondering if there might be a better way to accomplish this. See the point 1 in my first reply. student_rhr wrote: Also, what are your thoughts about Async Delegates? Have you seen any adverse effects of using them in ASP.NET? Asynchronous pattern will make your code unnecessarily complicated. So I'd stay away from it unless there is a strong need for using it. As I said, work with Thread or ThreadPool directly. Best wishes, Navaneeth

Probably a class.

Something like automatic properties? (Not available in .Net framework versions below 3.0) public MyType Property { get; internal set; }

Could it be that the control be getting updated in another method being fired before the button click event? I've never tried a fileupload in a gridview though. I didn't get any requirements for the signature

Use response.flush http://aspdotnetnstuff.blogspot.com

//field/font@fontFace I believe, and you can put something in [] to specific a condition, such as where there's a sibling node called textbox. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

Hi, if it suits your needs, then it is fine. One remark though: since all your keys are different (as they should), and a dictionary has an indexer (i.e. can be read as if it were an array), there is no need to search for a specific item, you could simply do: int index=listBox1.SelectedIndex; if (index>=0) { UserControl uc=dic[index]; MessageBox.Show(uc.Name, uc.Size.ToString()); winForm.Controls.Add(uc); } BTW: you don't really need a Dictionary, a simple List< UserControl> would work the same way. :) Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] This month's tips: - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google; - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get; - use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.

XML is coming from a Legacy system which is pushing out xml for dynamic form generation. I understand the "read the xml and iterate through the nodes concept", however, I was wondering if there is a better/simpler way, then just looping through the nodes, like maybe using Xpath or what have you. But thanks for the help I appreciate it.

Works like a charm. Thanks.

Guffa answered your question correctly for class instances: passing a class instance to a method will *NOT* copy it; you're passing a pointer to that instance. As Urs mentioned, if you pass a struct instance (say, a System.Int32, a DateTime, or your own custom struct), it *WILL* pass a copy of the struct instance to the method. In summary: class instances are passed by reference (no copying going on), and struct instances are passed by value (copying). As a side note, if you do want to pass values by reference, you can do so using the ref keyword. Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Sound The Great Shofar! The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

Sure. You'll need to load all assemblies in the .NET framework using Assembly.LoadFile, then call GetTypes on the resulting assemblies. For each type in each assembly, call GetCustomAttributes method. Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Roman Catholic Relevance? The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

Hi i think, You must update one table at a time. You can update A while joining it with B to get the values you need. ie: UPDATE A SET A.myField = B.newField FROM A, B WHERE A.primaryKey = B.foreignKey Reply With Quote OR try some thing like this UPDATE CaveatsData SET CaveatsData.Title = CavTitle.Title FROM CavTitle, CaveatsData where CavTitle.RecId = CaveatsData.RecId Prakash Mishra(Banglore,India)

I am not 100% sure.  It is something that does vary from software shop to software shop. "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer

There's nothing wrong with using app.settings. For the app to take advantage of setting changes, you can have the host form get the settings from the options form before it is disposed, or read them from your app.settings file after the options form is closed. private void ChangeSettings() { MyOptionsForm mof = new MyOptionsForm(); // show your settings form as a dialog // this line will show the form, and get the result when it closes // but you still have the mof reference to it, and can access it's // public properties. if (mof.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK) { // Make Setting Changes Here // Expose setting properties from MyOptionsForm // or re-read your settings file here. } } That help? Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.