Services and object orientation do not play well together. I don't think it is desirable (I'm not sure it is even possible) to pass up a Test. The list / array needs to be of a known type, passing up a `Test` is certainly an option in WCF, but you need to register `A` and `B` as KnownTypes. What you have done gives off a "bad code smell", the class structure is perfectly fine from an OO point of view (I'm not sure of the purpose of ``Test or `CustomCollection` however), _but_ when calling services it is much better to use well defined types for making calls, and the onus is on the server to provide these types. Addtionally [if memory serves] custom collections / Lists are frowned upon in asmx services as they won't interop well with Java etc. The normal pattern with services is: 1. Define types that can be passed up and down the wire in web service calls. 2. Make method calls that use the defined types in step 1. 3. Use Wsdl.exe to generate a proxy class to communicate with the web (asmx) service You then will probably need to convert the types passed up and down the wire into your proper object model. **Dalek Dave:** There are many words that some find offensive, Homosexuality, Alcoholism, Religion, Visual Basic, Manchester United, Butter. **Pete o'Hanlon:** If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.``

No you can't. To quote the Micosoft documentation[^]: The CASE expression cannot be used to control the flow of execution of Transact-SQL statements, statement blocks, user-defined functions, and stored procedures. For a list of control-of-flow methods, see Control-of-Flow Language (Transact-SQL)[^]. The question was regarding calling stored procedures and that is clearly not possible from within a case statement. If you have knowledge, let others light their candles at it. Margaret Fuller (1810 - 1850) [My Articles]  [My Website]

May be This[[^](http://social.msdn.mi<br mode= "New Window")] and Calling a web service in SQL2K[^] can help you cheers, Abhijit

Dave Kreskowiak wrote: Not recommended because this opens a high-risk security hole True in many cases, but with Sql Server 2000 that was the only way that came in mind. The need to optimize rises from a bad design.My articles[^]

No, try using google to find out more information on them

With which version of IE have you tested this with? I just tested the same issue with 7.0 and it worked fine at my end. Best Regards, Sam Xavier www.componentone.com

This question should be asked in ASP.NET forum. -Larantz- for those about to code, we salute you http://www.itverket.no

I propose you to make a googling[^]. I Love SQL

Please do not cross post http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=2166552&forumid=1649#xx2166552xx[^] "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." --Rich Cook

vamsimohan21 wrote: I am Sorry for that i missed a word in the previous post so i posted again There is an edit modify link, for future reference! -- modified at 7:59 Wednesday 4th July, 2007 --- How to get answers to your questions[^]

vamsimohan21 wrote: I am sorry that i am in situation that I would not be able to expose the code, I am sorry that I am in situation that I would not be able to answer the question. :doh: (You can't honestly expect anyone to solve your coding issue without seeing the code, do you?) --- How to get answers to your questions[^]

AFSEKI wrote: If you read my post completely not only 1 sentence of it you could see that I tell how a dll can be run. I did read your entire post. The latter part of your post contradicted the former part. I clarified it. AFSEKI wrote: You are a very excited young boy he? I'm neither young, nor exited. I'm old and grumpy. ;P Upcoming events: * Glasgow: SQL Server 2005 - XML and XML Query Plans, Mock Objects, SQL Server Reporting Services... Never write for other people. Write for yourself, because you have a passion for it. -- Marc Clifton My website

For this purpose you do not need this forum. Google will do.

Yes Suppose you have usercontrol name MyControl.ascx which is used in MyPage.aspx then write a method with all paramaters you want to send to use control call this method from your MyPage.aspx.cs as MyControlObject.MethodName(ParameterList) Thanks and Regards Sandeep If you want something you never had, do something you have never done!

vamsimohan21 wrote: if (String.Compare(c.GetType().ToString(), "System.Web.UI.LiteralControl") == 1) What on earth is this ?  It's a mess. if (c is LiteralControl) {   // etc } vamsimohan21 wrote: //Error 4 'System.Web.UI.Control' does not contain a definition for 'Enabled' Perhaps you need to have a derived class to have that property ? LiteralControl lc = c as LiteralControl; if (lc != null & lc.Enabled) {    // Whatever } This still won't work, unless you just didn't bother to post the code that causes it to be recursive, but I don't see how it can be. Christian Graus - C++ MVP

What stancrm has written is correct. You can use the 'Enabled' property of System.Windows.Forms.Control There are two types of fools in this world: One who give advice and the others who do not take it...

Hi, You have to cast the control first like foreach (Control c in form1.Controls) { if (c.ID == lnkLink) //where lnkLink is the ID of the control { LinkButton link = (LinkButton)c; //cast control object to whatever control it should be (ie. LinkButton, TextBox, etc.) bool status = c.Enabled; ... } }