The Back Room

CaptainSeeSharp wrote: this is a pump & dump for Ilion and Captain SeeSharp. FTFY Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. "! i don't exactly like or do programming and it only gives me a headache." - spotted in VB forums. I can do things with my brain that I can't even google. I can flex the front part of my brain instantly anytime I want. It can be exhausting and it even causes me vision problems for some reason. - CaptainSeeSharp

i prefer to sit back and watch the bullshit fly, i don't want to be wearing it.

It starts off talking about the joke that is the Federal Reserve, and then moves into talking about corporate imperialism, economic hitmen, etc. I forget what it wraps up with, it's been a while. "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect." - Mark Twain "Diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice doggy' until you can find a rock." - Mark Twain "If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man." - Mark Twain "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx

Converations in the back room[^] Jon Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less

:zzz:

CaptainSeeSharp wrote: Let this be an example to everyone Example of a conspiracy nut freaking out because .. people got tired of it

...and then there is this[^] and this.[^] We are speeding down the path of tyranny for sure. How can people be so stupid as to allow this to happen? I remember in school kids would ask how people could let Hitler come to power and do what he did, well now they get first hand experience and they are probably the ones supporting obama. Obloga Obama Blog[^] Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age to produce the sort of character and sort of beliefs that authorities consider desirable. Any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.

Oakman wrote: I'm too busy over in the Soapbox to want to get emails from here anymore. Riiiight!

Oakman wrote: Here's the truth, you lying sack of crap: truth about you: We have a bug in the system that a user has exploited in order to have messages removed. The user is aware he is abusing the system, I'm aware of the user, and I hope the user will stop abusing the site and its members. [^] truth spoken to you which you ran away from: Have your fights in here, but I would appreciate it if you do not take them (or your retaliation, if that's how you consider it) outside this forum. [^] You pathetic piece of shit; you have so destroyed you mind by your irrational hatred for me that you can't see what's right in front of face even as you are trumpeting the very thing you will not see and understand. What is it like to willingly be a character from 1984?

Oakman wrote: So where's the explanation for hacking the site? How dare you delete messages and then claim innocence? Is that really Christ's work? You're such a liar. I never once claimed that I didn't delete your messages. I said that I did not hack the site; that Mr Maunder is trying to imply to weaker minds, such as yours, that I did hack the site (*) is simply a reflection of his character. (*) Notice (assuming your mind is strong enough to do that) just *how* he said what he said. Shoot, you've even quoted him -- for which I do indeed thank you; I'd seen his post, but then I couldn't find it later to quote it for a post (which I'd intended to get composed yesterday) which you will surely enjoy when I post it.

Oakman wrote: My apologies, I was working on Soapbox 1.0 (which means I have to sign in as that entity) and I read your hilarious post. When I realised I was wearing a mask, I deleted with every intention of repeating what was little more than a simple "ROFL" but got distracted. Anyway: ROFL! No worries

Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote: So why not sue those services and free CP of all the database space for the Soapbox. Chris offered to work me through setting it up and a number of folks think that having it here would increase site traffic (good for CP) as old timers returned to a troll-free environment. And, for what it's worth, I expect that while there may end up being a fair number of posts in Soap Box 1.0, at least some of them would have tried to be seen above the constant cloud of insults and attacks from the link-monkey and the conspiracy nut here and now won't be. Jon Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less

image[^]

Who needs a conspiracy when groupthink will do?

Bob Emmett wrote: I see no reason for another Soapbox, those who find you irritating need only ignore your posts. Strangely, they seem unable to, which makes me think that they will find the new Soapbox lacks a little savour. Why do you assume that the Back Room and Soap Box 1.0 are mutually exclusive? Indeed there's been some talk of making sure that Back room always has posts since it's purpose, as far as Chris is concerned, is to keep the animals occupied and not messing up the lounge or the other Soapbox. Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin modified on Monday, June 15, 2009 8:32 AM

It is a disturbing video. A more in depth video of same subject can be viewed at nra.org. Search for Katrina Orleans.