The Weird and The Wonderful

Well 128 is not valid for a signed byte... What would be the second problem ? Philippe Mori

Wow this is very nice code. I´ll zeropad it to fixed line length copy an inversion of it to the front, rotate counterclockwise 90 degrees, apply a color index substitution. Et voila, we´ve got a sprite for a space invaders clone.

DerekTP123 wrote: "I want a website made. It must have all feature of Google and eBay. Shopping like Amazon would be good too. No time wasters."   And his bid limit for this task?   $250. Oh my god ! That's too costly :laugh: . I am eager to know what happen next :-\ Is that person, who bid, is known as Mark Zuckerberg ??? :confused:

Brad Barnhill wrote: He installs software for a living now "for a living"? Greetings - Jacek

Properties man ... properties. Good lord. Brad Barnhill

Ohh that makes my brain hurt. He uses arrays but cant pass an array. Either the language limits passing arrays or he is a moron. Let me just assume the answer to that and we will move on :) Brad Barnhill

:thumbsup: The lounge is a perfect choice for .... damn! I can't remember... :omg: I never finish anyth...

You'd have to physically find it first.

Another thing to be aware is that style comment will be sent with the web page while server side comments (using <%-- --%>) are stripped. Philippe Mori

I don't get a pairodoxies, so I wouldn't know... 5! Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."

Even worse are the possibilities that if this code did actually work, you now have a modal dialaog box open on the server waiting for user input. How many of those do you think can be spawned before some kind of memory error occurs?

:wtf: He must be suggested to join anti-if campaign. // ♫ 99 little bugs in the code, // 99 bugs in the code // We fix a bug, compile it again // 101 little bugs in the code ♫

He has joined the 'anti-if' campaign. // ♫ 99 little bugs in the code, // 99 bugs in the code // We fix a bug, compile it again // 101 little bugs in the code ♫

Isn't that the definition of legacy code?

The degree bit is not relevant - I'm self-taught, but can read books too. This is really really basic.

UserProfile selectedUser = null; selectedUser = Sql.GetUserDetails(username.Value); You might want to confirm that your KPI isn't based on the number of lines you write. "You get that on the big jobs."

Fabio V Silva wrote: If you're working as C# developer I think you should RTFM. You, sir, are a disgrace. Not only are you inaccurate in your assertions, you display the two traits I detest most about *some* people who work in this profession - a lack of respect for those around you, and a blinkered solipsism bordering on egomania. Wise the f**k up son. Nobody's impressed. Smokie, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules. www.geticeberg.com http://melpadden.wordpress.com

I agree it should be part of the spec. There's nothing to indicate in the message or sample that it's incorrect for it to be optional element which can be null. (Only that if it isn't null then it should have a length greater than zero).