What screen resolution do you use?
-
My boss was kind enough to set me up with a dual monitor display. For the 27" LCD on my left, I'm running natively at 1920x1200 (great for Visual Studio! :)). For the smaller 21" or so LCD on my right, I'm running at 1280x1024.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Little House on the Flickr Judah Himango
-
JimmyRopes wrote:
Are there any sources of statistical data available?
http://www.codeproject.com/script/survey/detail.asp?survey=510[^]
Thank you for the link. I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
-
Judah Himango wrote:
27" LCD
:omg: :wtf: 27" ... 1920*x1200 must look like 800x680 on a 17" :rolleyes: ~RaGE();
It actually looks[^] pretty nice. :-)
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Little House on the Flickr Judah Himango
-
My boss was kind enough to set me up with a dual monitor display. For the 27" LCD on my left, I'm running natively at 1920x1200 (great for Visual Studio! :)). For the smaller 21" or so LCD on my right, I'm running at 1280x1024.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Little House on the Flickr Judah Himango
Judah Himango wrote:
For the 27" LCD on my left
Lucky son of a gun!!!
Judah Himango wrote:
For the smaller 21" or so LCD on my right
Oh man, you are really giving it to the rest of us, aren't you? Regards, Nish
My blog : Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
Work : 19" CRT @ 1152x864 Home : 17" LCD @ 1280x960 Regards, Nish
My blog : Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
1024 x 768 Easier on the eyes
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
This thread actually brings up a question I had related to screen size during development vs. deployment... In the older VB6 IDE (No flames please) there was IMHO a great feature where you could view your form in relation to various screen resolutions. It used to sit just below the control property window and would scale to show your resolution and several common ones below that and then show an image of your form in relation to those. Has anyone seen that hidden away in any of the various menus and settings boxes? I have not really seen it since the 1.0 version of the framework was released. I know that you can just watch the height and width of your forms but having that little visual reminder was always handy. It might actually be a good idea for MS to put in a project setting that would let you pick a deployment scenario and help you keep your forms (maybe via a compiler warning) within that range.
George Carlin wrote: "Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things." Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: If the physicists find a universal theory describing the laws of universe, I'm sure the asshole constant will be an integral part of that theory.
My Blog[^]
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
1280 x 1024 on 19" crt at about 22 inches away. 1600 x 1200, about 6 inches away. Any higher than that, and I'd be inside the monitor. :) delete this; * poof! *
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
80x24 Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
-
80x24 Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
:laugh: You could bump up to 80x43 if you have an EGA (or was it VGA, can't remember now...) delete this; * poof! *
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
-
1600x1200 on a 19(18") crt and 1280x1024 on a 19" lcd at work. 1600x1200 on a 17" crt at home.
dan neely wrote:
1600x1200 on a 19(18") crt and 1280x1024 on a 19" lcd at work.
Shouldn't that be the other way around? Regards, Nish
My blog : Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET
-
:laugh: You could bump up to 80x43 if you have an EGA (or was it VGA, can't remember now...) delete this; * poof! *
EGA. VGA could do 80x50 From the Churchdown Parish Magazine: "Would the Congregation please note that the bowl at the back of the Church, labelled 'For The Sick,' is for monetary donations only."
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
1st Monitor: 1152x864 / 21in. CRT 2nd Monitor: 1024x768 / 17in. CRT I'd keep the resolution higher on the main monitor except my eye muscles have a bit of an easier time with that. And, having a higher scan rate is nice for my eyes also. The 2nd one I don't stare at nearly as much, so I tend to keep the resolution higher for its size anyway. Jeremy Falcon
-
I'm old and like to avoid wearing glasses. It's 800x600 on a 17" monitor for me. :) Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Remember that in Texas, Gun Control is hitting what you aim at. [Richard Stringer] Nice sig! [Tim Deveaux on Matt Newman's sig with a quote from me]
Thank you for volunteering your relative age. I’m old also and need my glasses regardless of the resolution I set. I was going to ask about age but decided not to for fear of offending some people with the question. Thanks again for your reply. JR I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 13:55 Thursday 19th January, 2006
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
1280x960 on a 17" CRT :sigh::(( ___________________________________ Tozzi is right: Gaia is getting rid of us. My Blog [ITA]
-
My boss was kind enough to set me up with a dual monitor display. For the 27" LCD on my left, I'm running natively at 1920x1200 (great for Visual Studio! :)). For the smaller 21" or so LCD on my right, I'm running at 1280x1024.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Little House on the Flickr Judah Himango
I might not even have to wear my glasses if I had a 27" that I was sitting 2 feet away from. I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes
-
EGA. VGA could do 80x50 From the Churchdown Parish Magazine: "Would the Congregation please note that the bowl at the back of the Church, labelled 'For The Sick,' is for monetary donations only."
Daniel Turini wrote:
VGA could do 80x50
I still remember myself learning programming in Borland Pascal and Borland C++ at this resolution. And what a big step forward from older Turbo Pascal was the syntax highlighting in the new IDE (of course, on the blue background). Those were the times... :) Rado
Radoslav Bielik www.neomyz.com/poll [^] - Get your own web poll www.neomyz.com/rss [^] - RSS Web Reader - latest news for your site www.neomyz.com/games [^] - Add a small game to your website
-
What size monitor and screen resolution do you use? Are there any sources of statistical data available? [edit] Thank you all for your replies. I realize now that I need to consider higher resolutions than I have in the past for web page layout. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. [/edit] I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -- modified at 14:03 Thursday 19th January, 2006
1920x1200 4tw!
Found on Bash.org [erno] hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is.
-- modified at 14:14 Thursday 19th January, 2006
