Nice little typing test I just came across
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
96.something or other
Jon Sagara When I grow up, I'm changing my name to Joe Kickass! My Site | My Blog | My Articles
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
53.something and 5 mistakes... S l o w :rolleyes:
daniero
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
97 on the third try. We are all geeks! (BTW, class of '97 rules!)
A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the Universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." -- Stephen Crane
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
94.45 WPM, but I'm dyslexic so I have an excuse. :-D
Ed.Poore wrote:
Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense
:laugh: It's like a drug. Once you get used to it, there's no going back.
Jeremy Falcon
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
54, 54 i've recently unlearned how to type and spell . not sure if it's a keyboard change or if i'm just tired of typing...
Let's execute on the customer-facing market-driven swim-lane paradigm!
-
Ed.Poore wrote:
My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
Nice, mine was 36.45 wpm but I've had a few :beer: :)
I'd like to help but I am too lazy to Google it for you.
PaulC1972 wrote:
Nice, mine was 36.45 wpm but I've had a few :beer:
:laugh: Yeah, well it all works out in the end.
Jeremy Falcon
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
I don't think the wpm calculation is correct. I got 90-something on this test, but another test[^] puts me around 60-70 consistently.
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
Ed.Poore wrote:
122.11 wpm[^]
404
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
Online Project Management
Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree -
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
71.3 with one mistake.
This statement is false.
-
Ed.Poore wrote:
122.11 wpm[^]
404
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
Online Project Management
Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree -
54, 54 i've recently unlearned how to type and spell . not sure if it's a keyboard change or if i'm just tired of typing...
Let's execute on the customer-facing market-driven swim-lane paradigm!
-
I don't think the wpm calculation is correct. I got 90-something on this test, but another test[^] puts me around 60-70 consistently.
-
94.45 WPM, but I'm dyslexic so I have an excuse. :-D
Ed.Poore wrote:
Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense
:laugh: It's like a drug. Once you get used to it, there's no going back.
Jeremy Falcon
-
97 on the third try. We are all geeks! (BTW, class of '97 rules!)
A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the Universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." -- Stephen Crane
-
53.something and 5 mistakes... S l o w :rolleyes:
daniero
-
Ed.Poore wrote:
My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
Nice, mine was 36.45 wpm but I've had a few :beer: :)
I'd like to help but I am too lazy to Google it for you.
I wonder if I could beat that with one finger... Oh well, I suppose I'll cancel the sleeping session planned for tonight :sigh: [edit]http://ed.poore.googlepages.com/typing-single-finger.bmp[^], he he, 38.54 WPM, beaten you with one finger. I suppose I'd better try getting drunk now[/edit]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
Last modified: 26 July 2006 17:31:33 -- I did it!
-
Ed.Poore wrote:
122.11 wpm[^]
404
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
Online Project Management
Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree:wtf::omg:
daniero
-
96.7wpm. :cool: I bet I could break 100 if they were full sentences...
