Nice little typing test I just came across
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
71.3 with one mistake.
This statement is false.
-
Ed.Poore wrote:
122.11 wpm[^]
404
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
Online Project Management
Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree -
I don't think the wpm calculation is correct. I got 90-something on this test, but another test[^] puts me around 60-70 consistently.
-
54, 54 i've recently unlearned how to type and spell . not sure if it's a keyboard change or if i'm just tired of typing...
Let's execute on the customer-facing market-driven swim-lane paradigm!
-
94.45 WPM, but I'm dyslexic so I have an excuse. :-D
Ed.Poore wrote:
Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense
:laugh: It's like a drug. Once you get used to it, there's no going back.
Jeremy Falcon
-
97 on the third try. We are all geeks! (BTW, class of '97 rules!)
A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the Universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." -- Stephen Crane
-
53.something and 5 mistakes... S l o w :rolleyes:
daniero
-
96.7wpm. :cool: I bet I could break 100 if they were full sentences...
-
Ed.Poore wrote:
122.11 wpm[^]
404
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
Online Project Management
Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree:wtf::omg:
daniero
-
Ed.Poore wrote:
My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
Nice, mine was 36.45 wpm but I've had a few :beer: :)
I'd like to help but I am too lazy to Google it for you.
I wonder if I could beat that with one finger... Oh well, I suppose I'll cancel the sleeping session planned for tonight :sigh: [edit]http://ed.poore.googlepages.com/typing-single-finger.bmp[^], he he, 38.54 WPM, beaten you with one finger. I suppose I'd better try getting drunk now[/edit]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
Last modified: 26 July 2006 17:31:33 -- I did it!
-
:wtf::omg:
daniero
its 404 - file not found for ed.poore 122.11 wpm record :)
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
Online Project Management
Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree -
I wonder if I could beat that with one finger... Oh well, I suppose I'll cancel the sleeping session planned for tonight :sigh: [edit]http://ed.poore.googlepages.com/typing-single-finger.bmp[^], he he, 38.54 WPM, beaten you with one finger. I suppose I'd better try getting drunk now[/edit]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
Last modified: 26 July 2006 17:31:33 -- I did it!
Ed.Poore wrote:
I wonder if I could beat that with one finger...
Well, I sobered up and did 92 wpm with no mistakes :->
I'd like to help but I am too lazy to Google it for you.
-
I wonder if I could beat that with one finger... Oh well, I suppose I'll cancel the sleeping session planned for tonight :sigh: [edit]http://ed.poore.googlepages.com/typing-single-finger.bmp[^], he he, 38.54 WPM, beaten you with one finger. I suppose I'd better try getting drunk now[/edit]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
Last modified: 26 July 2006 17:31:33 -- I did it!
Ed.Poore wrote:
http://ed.poore.googlepages.com/typing-single-finger.bmp\[^\], he he, 38.54 WPM, beaten you with one finger
Yeah, but did ya see my other post. Did a 92wpm with 0 mistakes. Your .bmp is still 404'd :) I did a 130.59wpm with only one blemish[^] :-> -- modified at 18:48 Wednesday 26th July, 2006
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
105 for me. :cool:
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Messianic Instrumentals (with audio) The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
-
http://labs.jphantom.com/wpm/[^] Although it's not suited to a programmer's style. Anybody want to write one? Or are we all too embarrased by our reliance on Intellisense (when it works:rolleyes:) :) My speed (after a few attempts to get used to the language): 122.11 wpm[^]
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
120.6wpm, with two mistakes.
Ryan
"Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
-
Was it sentences or was it (as it looks like from my glance) just random alpha-numeric characters? If the latter then I'd expect "scores" to drop.
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
It's real paragraphs. But with all the punctuation and capitalization included. It uses a Java applet to run the test.
-
It's real paragraphs. But with all the punctuation and capitalization included. It uses a Java applet to run the test.
I think it has to do with the words it uses. There seemed to be a large number of large words. I think characters per minute is a more accurate metric of speed.
This statement is false.
-
I think it has to do with the words it uses. There seemed to be a large number of large words. I think characters per minute is a more accurate metric of speed.
This statement is false.
Chris S Kaiser wrote:
I think it has to do with the words it uses. There seemed to be a large number of large words. I think characters per minute is a more accurate metric of speed.
The 'official definition' of words per minute defines a word as 5 keys (letters, numbers, symbols, space, enter, tab, etc). So unless the test isn't following the rules, word length shouldn't matter.
-
Intellisense hog ;P
As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it
Nah, I don't have that much practice with english actually.
daniero
![http://ed.poore.googlepages.com/typing-single-finger.bmp\[^\]](http://ed.poore.googlepages.com/typing-single-finger.bmp%5C%5B%5E%5C%5D){kind=link}
