Which is your favorite Editor?

[Michael A Barnhart]

Sarath. wrote:

your favorite Editor

For just an editor my trusty stand by is "PFE". PFE Site[^]. Not support and you may have to search for an active download (at least the North American link is dead.) For an IDE it is Visual Studio (2003 for today).

[Gary Wheeler]

Kirtan Gor wrote:

Its horrible

Indeed. I was using it under a spectacularly wretched implementation of UNIX, which didn't help.

---

Software Zen: delete this;

[Eytukan]

Turbo C++ :rolleyes:

---

Marquee is no more :( [My Current Status] Link2006 wrote:Let's take it outside of CP Jeremy : Please don't.I would love to see this.I'm making the popcorn already.

[Ed Poore]

Even if it did, the UI looks horrible X|, not to mention the colour schemes in the screenshots.

---

If you're stuck in a rut: 1) Consult the documentation* 2) Google it 3) Ask a sensible question 4) Try an ancient ritualistic knowledge summoning (:badger::badger::badger:) dance :jig: 5) Phone :bob: * - If the documentation is MSDN > 6.0 then forget it!

[Marc Soleda]

Scite is great !!! I enjoyed a lot when I integrated in one of my applications. It's very flexible !! Marc Soleda

... she said you are the perfect stranger she said baby let's keep it like this... Dire Straits

[Obliterator]

I really don't mind which editor I use so long as Visual Assist [^] integrates with it!! :) Yes I know that means I'm tied to using Visual Studio!!! But Visual Assist adds so much to the IDE that without it, other editors are left lagging well behind in the dark ages! When other IDEs get enough popularity that they support (or mimick) Visual Assist's functionality I may take a look, until then I'm stuck with VS2005 (despite its *numerous* flaws for C++ developers - but don't get me started on that one!).

-- The Obliterator

[Paul Watson]

TextMate. Lovely.

regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

Shog9 wrote:

eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

[Sarath C]

Ohh!! are you using Mac?

[Ray Hayes]

Neville, I heard once about an author of some software (years back on unix) that had a constant 'job' scanning for discussions about his software, so he could 'join-in' the discussion and promote his tool... .. that's you isn't it? ;-) You almost always seem to be the first reply when this type of question is (fairly frequently) asked! ... or is it an automated response? Is that a documented feature of ED for Windows?

Regards, Ray

[Ray Hayes]

I used to be a big SciTE fan, now I use notepad++ as my simple editor -- which uses the same "core" editor, but many more bells and whistles.

Regards, Ray

[Douglas Troy]

I primarily use the Visual Studio IDE, however, outside of that, I use TextPad[^] It's very easy to configure Syntax highlighting for various languages (e.g., SQL, JavaScript, Etc...). It's fast and easy to set-up for various compilers (C++, Java, C#, Etc...). My two cents.

---

:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

[Phil Harding]

Finally someone voted TextPad, I was afraid I'd have to do it myself :^)

Phil Harding.
myBlog [^]  |  mySite [^]

[Henrik Husted]

No, it's "just" an editor. You can of cause launch the compiler and linker and it will capture the warnings/errors. But most editors do that. It's main attraction (at least to me) is the analyzer part, I'm working on fairly large projects with 1000's of files and SourceInsight will show any symbols (i.e. a struct with all it's members) with no delay.

[Nemanja Trifunovic]

Douglas Troy wrote:

TextPad[^]

Used to be Unicode-blind the last time I looked into it. Did anything change in this regard?

---

Programming Blog utf8-cpp

[Tim Craig]

CodeWright mostly because I invested a lot of time programming it (and Brief before that) to behave properly before DevStudio was programmable. I never saw it worth the effort to make it bend to my will although I have played with it a little.

The evolution of the human genome is too important to be left to chance.