Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. What do I do now? [modified]

What do I do now? [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
tutorialquestion
58 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Joe Q

    I just did a desktop review of a guys code and sent him some comments. His code was not very good. I saw many potential problems, he used goto's a lot so it was confusing to follow, it wen't against the style guide, it had dead code, and statics so people couldn't use many generic and useful functions. I'm the software lead so I felt like I needed to say something. I e-mailed him, and only him my comments and I only commented on the code, not him personally. I made sure I didn't use the word "you" and re-read it 3 times to try to make it as anti-inflamtory as possible. He responded to my e-mail to everyone, peer's and bosses, with some pointed, personal comments toward me and some about my comments. Also comments about why he did some of what he did (which had no software basis). I'm going to talk to him after lunch (I'm in a different building). Any suggestions on what I say to him? I'll talk about the style guide, but what about the crappy code? I'm used to more rational people. Joe Q -- modified at 13:41 Tuesday 31st October, 2006 [CONTINUED] I really appreciate the advice, I'm going to talk to him now. Calmly, breath deeply, don't say "you're fired" (Actually I can't back that one up anyway), be professional, use the facts only and talk only about the code. Thanks, and now...into the abyss!

    P Offline
    P Offline
    peterchen
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    OK - you're already back, I guess, but: (a) As Software lead you can demand him to rules of conduct. They are not so easy to handle (esp. if you are used to "rational" people) but it is important to make clear that you won't tolerate this behavior (getting personal, "broadcasting" without trying to solve this on a person-to-person level). (b) Don't argue about "why"'s as long as he isn't willing to accept your / the coding standards final decision in a disagreement. Don't let him drag you down to having to justify each and every point oif the coding standard, or your decisions if he isn't willing to cooperate. Bring it up with the boss. He made it public, make sure he also hears your point. Be rational, At least that's what I think. Now going to read what others say.


    We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
    Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Austin

      That was my first thought. Then I remembered how much I hated reviewing resumes and spending several of the teams hours interviewing candidates.

      A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long, Time Enough For Love

      P Offline
      P Offline
      peterchen
      wrote on last edited by
      #48

      That's still much better than dragging someone along who eats more resources than he provides benefits. I don't think a "first offense" should result in "you're fired" - but it's finally best for you and your team.


      We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
      Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P peterchen

        That's still much better than dragging someone along who eats more resources than he provides benefits. I don't think a "first offense" should result in "you're fired" - but it's finally best for you and your team.


        We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
        Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris Austin
        wrote on last edited by
        #49

        I agree 100%. I just hate the hiring process.

        A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long, Time Enough For Love

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Maunder

          Fire him and get someone who a) can code b) isn't 5 years old

          cheers, Chris Maunder

          CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

          P Offline
          P Offline
          peterchen
          wrote on last edited by
          #50

          Not that these people grow on trees...


          We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
          Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Joe Q

            I just did a desktop review of a guys code and sent him some comments. His code was not very good. I saw many potential problems, he used goto's a lot so it was confusing to follow, it wen't against the style guide, it had dead code, and statics so people couldn't use many generic and useful functions. I'm the software lead so I felt like I needed to say something. I e-mailed him, and only him my comments and I only commented on the code, not him personally. I made sure I didn't use the word "you" and re-read it 3 times to try to make it as anti-inflamtory as possible. He responded to my e-mail to everyone, peer's and bosses, with some pointed, personal comments toward me and some about my comments. Also comments about why he did some of what he did (which had no software basis). I'm going to talk to him after lunch (I'm in a different building). Any suggestions on what I say to him? I'll talk about the style guide, but what about the crappy code? I'm used to more rational people. Joe Q -- modified at 13:41 Tuesday 31st October, 2006 [CONTINUED] I really appreciate the advice, I'm going to talk to him now. Calmly, breath deeply, don't say "you're fired" (Actually I can't back that one up anyway), be professional, use the facts only and talk only about the code. Thanks, and now...into the abyss!

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Alvaro Mendez
            wrote on last edited by
            #51

            You've received a lot of great advice. The only thing I can add is to avoid doing this by email in the future. Perhaps you can type up your comments inside an email, without sending it. Then, give him a call and ask him to meet with you in your office to discuss your concerns. You can go over each of the points you typed with him in person, hopefully for a more friendly and polite exchange. It will help you understand why he wrote his code that way, and help him undestand why you feel he shouldn't have. At the end, when all the points have been ironed out, you may wish to send him what's left of the email to him as a reminder of what he should fix or shouldn't do in the future. That's how I would have approached the situation. Regards, Alvaro


            God existing isn't entirely impossible, but there's absolutely no evidence for it, so... the personal God as described by the Christian Bible existing is just as likely as a Pink Unicorn having created the universe, oh.. say... last Thursday. It's equally possible the moon has a core made of cheese. It's equally possible this sentence is in Spanish when you're not looking. - Someone on the Internet

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L l a u r e n

              "You're fired" ?


              "there is no spoon"
              {some projects} {about me}

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Allen Anderson
              wrote on last edited by
              #52

              I agree, go donald trump on his ass. And when you do, don't forget the little hand gesture he does. 'your (hand motion) fired'. It takes some practice but if you get it right it's worth the extra effort. :)

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Allen Anderson

                I agree, go donald trump on his ass. And when you do, don't forget the little hand gesture he does. 'your (hand motion) fired'. It takes some practice but if you get it right it's worth the extra effort. :)

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Dan Neely
                wrote on last edited by
                #53

                If you're going to insult the person while firing him, make sure you've got a rentacop along for backup.

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Dan Neely

                  If you're going to insult the person while firing him, make sure you've got a rentacop along for backup.

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Allen Anderson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #54

                  was a joke. You'd have to see the show to realize how campy it is when he does it.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Joe Q

                    There have been many problems with this guy before. The company policy is to not get rid of any one because of incompatance, just for not following policies.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Max Santos
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #55

                    Joe Q wrote:

                    The company policy is to not get rid of any one because of incompatance, just for not following policies.

                    Yeah right! This way they (the company) can keep de crap as the good ones get tired of doing everythng and decide to move elsewhere!! Good Policy!! :D

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Allen Anderson

                      was a joke. You'd have to see the show to realize how campy it is when he does it.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dan Neely
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #56

                      I saw the end of an episode. I want those 20 minutes of my life back!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Joe Q

                        There have been many problems with this guy before. The company policy is to not get rid of any one because of incompatance, just for not following policies.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        GaryWoodfine
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #57

                        He's and ideal candidate for a promotion to managment then.


                        "a fool will not learn from a wise man, but a wise man will learn from a fool" "It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." - Theodore Roosevelt "Success is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill


                        My Website || My Blog

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G GaryWoodfine

                          He's and ideal candidate for a promotion to managment then.


                          "a fool will not learn from a wise man, but a wise man will learn from a fool" "It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." - Theodore Roosevelt "Success is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill


                          My Website || My Blog

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Joe Q
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #58

                          :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Wait...that's probably true :sigh:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups