Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. iPhone is real [updated] [again]

iPhone is real [updated] [again]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
ioscom
69 Posts 28 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Paul Watson

    Nice, Apple are doing the iPhone[^]. Full touch-screen, no physical buttons, 8gb, music, video and... wow, it makes phone calls :) It runs OS X and includes the Safari browser, not just a cut-down mobile browser (so full Ajax.) It looks pretty good. $499 for 4gb model, $599 for 8gb (no brainer), available in June in the USA, Q4 in Europe, 2008 for Asia. Apple site updated with pretty pictures and marketeering.[^]

    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

    Shog9 wrote:

    I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Bassam Abdul Baki
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Damn that's nice. :drool:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rohde

      Yeah, it looks very nice. The features are quite amazing I think. But let's see...


      "When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, `Who is destroying the world?' You are."
      -Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Paul Watson
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Yeah, I don't want to get too excited before someone else holds it and comments. The touchscreen might not be tactile enough, it might be too complex, battery life may be awful and it may cost more than my MacBook Pro :) Still, it is impressive even as just a concept demo.

      regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

      Shog9 wrote:

      I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

      R N M 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Watson

        Yeah, I don't want to get too excited before someone else holds it and comments. The touchscreen might not be tactile enough, it might be too complex, battery life may be awful and it may cost more than my MacBook Pro :) Still, it is impressive even as just a concept demo.

        regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

        Shog9 wrote:

        I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rohde
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Couldn't agree more.


        "When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, `Who is destroying the world?' You are."
        -Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Paul Watson

          Nice, Apple are doing the iPhone[^]. Full touch-screen, no physical buttons, 8gb, music, video and... wow, it makes phone calls :) It runs OS X and includes the Safari browser, not just a cut-down mobile browser (so full Ajax.) It looks pretty good. $499 for 4gb model, $599 for 8gb (no brainer), available in June in the USA, Q4 in Europe, 2008 for Asia. Apple site updated with pretty pictures and marketeering.[^]

          regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

          Shog9 wrote:

          I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Losinger
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          want must have !

          image processing toolkits | batch image processing | blogging

          M P 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Losinger

            want must have !

            image processing toolkits | batch image processing | blogging

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Paul Watson
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            hehe. You can get one in June on Cingular.

            regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

            Shog9 wrote:

            I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Losinger

              want must have !

              image processing toolkits | batch image processing | blogging

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Maximilien
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              That might be a reason for me to change carrier !!! hopefully it will be supported in Canada.


              Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Watson

                hehe. You can get one in June on Cingular.

                regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                Shog9 wrote:

                I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Doctor Nick
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Too bad their service here sucks. If I switched I wouldn't get ANY signal in half my state! :sigh:

                ------------------------------------- Do not do what has already been done. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.. but it ROCKS absolutely, too.

                P J 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • M Maximilien

                  That might be a reason for me to change carrier !!! hopefully it will be supported in Canada.


                  Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Doctor Nick
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  If their coverage in Canada is anything like the US you won't want to switch unless you REALLY like listening to MP3s since you won't have service in half the country.

                  ------------------------------------- Do not do what has already been done. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.. but it ROCKS absolutely, too.

                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Watson

                    Nice, Apple are doing the iPhone[^]. Full touch-screen, no physical buttons, 8gb, music, video and... wow, it makes phone calls :) It runs OS X and includes the Safari browser, not just a cut-down mobile browser (so full Ajax.) It looks pretty good. $499 for 4gb model, $599 for 8gb (no brainer), available in June in the USA, Q4 in Europe, 2008 for Asia. Apple site updated with pretty pictures and marketeering.[^]

                    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                    Shog9 wrote:

                    I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Maximilien
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Let's see what the new iPods will look like !!


                    Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Paul Watson

                      Nice, Apple are doing the iPhone[^]. Full touch-screen, no physical buttons, 8gb, music, video and... wow, it makes phone calls :) It runs OS X and includes the Safari browser, not just a cut-down mobile browser (so full Ajax.) It looks pretty good. $499 for 4gb model, $599 for 8gb (no brainer), available in June in the USA, Q4 in Europe, 2008 for Asia. Apple site updated with pretty pictures and marketeering.[^]

                      regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                      Shog9 wrote:

                      I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Duncan Edwards Jones
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Wow - if anyone has RIM (Blackberry) shares I'd suggest selling them now...

                      '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Doctor Nick

                        If their coverage in Canada is anything like the US you won't want to switch unless you REALLY like listening to MP3s since you won't have service in half the country.

                        ------------------------------------- Do not do what has already been done. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.. but it ROCKS absolutely, too.

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nish Nishant
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Nicholas Wigant wrote:

                        If their coverage in Canada is anything like the US you won't want to switch unless you REALLY like listening to MP3s since you won't have service in half the country.

                        As far as I know, Cingular does not operate in Canada. (Unless they have a tie-up with some Canadian phone company)

                        Regards, Nish


                        Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                        Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. (*Sample chapter available online*)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Paul Watson

                          Nice, Apple are doing the iPhone[^]. Full touch-screen, no physical buttons, 8gb, music, video and... wow, it makes phone calls :) It runs OS X and includes the Safari browser, not just a cut-down mobile browser (so full Ajax.) It looks pretty good. $499 for 4gb model, $599 for 8gb (no brainer), available in June in the USA, Q4 in Europe, 2008 for Asia. Apple site updated with pretty pictures and marketeering.[^]

                          regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                          Shog9 wrote:

                          I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Member 96
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Looks pretty cool, but they simply won't be able to call it an IPhone since that is trademarked to another company already. I wonder in the end how people will feel about the non tactile nature of the buttons. I've never held an IPod but I imagine one of the really good things about the current design is that you can operate it without looking at it because you can feel the buttons on it. If they could have added some sort of tactility to it in addition to the touch screen that would be a *killer* app.

                          P D F 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • D Doctor Nick

                            Too bad their service here sucks. If I switched I wouldn't get ANY signal in half my state! :sigh:

                            ------------------------------------- Do not do what has already been done. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.. but it ROCKS absolutely, too.

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jon Sagara
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            My experience is exactly the opposite. Cingular coverage rocks, and everyone else sucks.

                            Jon Sagara When I grow up, I'm changing my name to Joe Kickass! My Blog | My Site | My Articles

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Doctor Nick

                              Too bad their service here sucks. If I switched I wouldn't get ANY signal in half my state! :sigh:

                              ------------------------------------- Do not do what has already been done. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.. but it ROCKS absolutely, too.

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              Paul Watson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Glad I am in Europe, it should come here unlocked and on any network.

                              regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                              Shog9 wrote:

                              I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Member 96

                                Looks pretty cool, but they simply won't be able to call it an IPhone since that is trademarked to another company already. I wonder in the end how people will feel about the non tactile nature of the buttons. I've never held an IPod but I imagine one of the really good things about the current design is that you can operate it without looking at it because you can feel the buttons on it. If they could have added some sort of tactility to it in addition to the touch screen that would be a *killer* app.

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                Paul Watson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                They must have bought it from Linksys/Cisco or feel that they have a legal position to use it. Jobs keeps calling it that and all the screens say iPhone.

                                regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                                Shog9 wrote:

                                I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Paul Watson

                                  They must have bought it from Linksys/Cisco or feel that they have a legal position to use it. Jobs keeps calling it that and all the screens say iPhone.

                                  regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                                  Shog9 wrote:

                                  I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Member 96
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  Not likely, in fact there are 4 companies that have applied for the IPhone trademark or derivitive, two of which have already sold products with that trademark, none of them are Apple. http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1371[^] The UPSPTO is simply never going to give a trademark to a company (apple) that apparently hasn't even applied for it over two other companies that have already been selling products with that trademark.

                                  R P 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Member 96

                                    Not likely, in fact there are 4 companies that have applied for the IPhone trademark or derivitive, two of which have already sold products with that trademark, none of them are Apple. http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1371[^] The UPSPTO is simply never going to give a trademark to a company (apple) that apparently hasn't even applied for it over two other companies that have already been selling products with that trademark.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Rocky Moore
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    I would imagine they have already worked out deals. It would be stupid for a company the size of Apple to have such obvious trademark conflicts and be sued for everything they own.

                                    Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft doing it again!

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Member 96

                                      Looks pretty cool, but they simply won't be able to call it an IPhone since that is trademarked to another company already. I wonder in the end how people will feel about the non tactile nature of the buttons. I've never held an IPod but I imagine one of the really good things about the current design is that you can operate it without looking at it because you can feel the buttons on it. If they could have added some sort of tactility to it in addition to the touch screen that would be a *killer* app.

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      David Stone
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      John Cardinal wrote:

                                      I've never held an IPod but I imagine one of the really good things about the current design is that you can operate it without looking at it because you can feel the buttons on it.

                                      I rarely ever use my iPod without looking at it. The only thing might be to hit next while it's in shuffle mode and I don't want to listen to a song that's come up. But I'm sure there'll be some sort of gesture you can draw over it to do that instead.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Paul Watson

                                        Nice, Apple are doing the iPhone[^]. Full touch-screen, no physical buttons, 8gb, music, video and... wow, it makes phone calls :) It runs OS X and includes the Safari browser, not just a cut-down mobile browser (so full Ajax.) It looks pretty good. $499 for 4gb model, $599 for 8gb (no brainer), available in June in the USA, Q4 in Europe, 2008 for Asia. Apple site updated with pretty pictures and marketeering.[^]

                                        regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                                        Shog9 wrote:

                                        I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Rocky Moore
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        Looks cool, just too bad it is a phone! This is what the iPod should be like :)

                                        Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft doing it again!

                                        P M 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Rocky Moore

                                          I would imagine they have already worked out deals. It would be stupid for a company the size of Apple to have such obvious trademark conflicts and be sued for everything they own.

                                          Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft doing it again!

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Member 96
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          Well as Scottie might say "you canna break the laws of physics". This is a similar situation. I see absolutely no way around it. If there was ever a hope that Cisco would sell the trademark to Apple it was surely dashed when only a few months ago Cisco released a line of products under that long held trademark.

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups