Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Vista not such a big success here.

Vista not such a big success here.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
40 Posts 18 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rocky Moore

    Just wait, Vista will prove itself as did 2000, XP and Windows 2003 server. Vista is a golden and will only improve. With in three years most people will be running Vista and XP will be that old OS no one wants any more.

    Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Scratch: fun for all ages for free!

    K Offline
    K Offline
    KaRl
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    5 years to get something which 'will only improve'? Waoh - Sounds like a dilbertian project.

    Rocky Moore wrote:

    With in three years most people will be running Vista and XP will be that old OS no one wants any more.

    Wanna bet? :-D


    It is easier to make war than to make peace. Fold with us! ¤ flickr

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Bradml

      I was talking to my mate at the local Harvey Norman about the vista launch last night. Apparently the sold a whopping 2 copies!


      Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.

      E Offline
      E Offline
      ednrgc
      wrote on last edited by
      #32

      Vista is possibly the make/break operating system for Microsoft. I actually believe that a lack of interest in Vista will send a message to Microsoft that bloat is not what the consumer wants. Most people want an operating system that is built from the ground up and does not need to be patched every 2 days. Build it correctly from the get-go, without all the user restrictions Vista applies. Check out Rick Strahl's Blog Some great points pro & con.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rocky Moore

        Just wait, Vista will prove itself as did 2000, XP and Windows 2003 server. Vista is a golden and will only improve. With in three years most people will be running Vista and XP will be that old OS no one wants any more.

        Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Scratch: fun for all ages for free!

        M Offline
        M Offline
        mobilemobile
        wrote on last edited by
        #33

        Well, people will definitely stop thinking about XP when Microsoft stops doing service packs and then drops support entirely for it.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M mobilemobile

          Well, people will definitely stop thinking about XP when Microsoft stops doing service packs and then drops support entirely for it.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Neely
          wrote on last edited by
          #34

          Honestly that won't put a dent in the diehards. They'll still be using 2k until they can no longer get drivers for it, and will be dragged kicking and screaming into the future protesting that they can't easilt figure their fuel economy in rods per hogshead anymore.

          -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Steve Hansen

            I disagree. You find it odd that an OS from 2007 uses more memory then one from 2000? Have you compared the prices for memory from 2000 and 2007. I haven't checked for memory but I did for HDD's, I checked the recommended requirements for XP and Vista. Vista is alot cheaper in GiB/$, GiB/€, GiB/£ than XP.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Monin D
            wrote on last edited by
            #35

            Did anyone checked Vista on 1.6-1.7Ghz machine? I think on most of notebooks Vista will work rather slow. Because, as I think, normal speed for notebook is about 1.6-1.7Ghz ... should I forget about buying Vista? :)

            R D 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • B Bradml

              I disagree. It is a power hungry monstrosity of an OS. I will not be using it until the last moment possible.


              Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rocky Moore
              wrote on last edited by
              #36

              Well, that is fine, you can join that small group, but most of the mass market will be using it unless some other company does something drastic in thier OS's and that is just a fact of life. Most people now are using XP, it is not that they all planned to, it is that they bought new machines with it preinstalled. It is typically a 3-5 year upgrade cycle, so the numbers are pretty easy.

              Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Scratch: fun for all ages for free!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Monin D

                Did anyone checked Vista on 1.6-1.7Ghz machine? I think on most of notebooks Vista will work rather slow. Because, as I think, normal speed for notebook is about 1.6-1.7Ghz ... should I forget about buying Vista? :)

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rocky Moore
                wrote on last edited by
                #37

                Actually, my wife is using Vista ultimate on a 1.7ghz machine with only 512 MB RAM and while not the most speedy machine on the block, it is quite usable.

                Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Scratch: fun for all ages for free!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Monin D

                  Did anyone checked Vista on 1.6-1.7Ghz machine? I think on most of notebooks Vista will work rather slow. Because, as I think, normal speed for notebook is about 1.6-1.7Ghz ... should I forget about buying Vista? :)

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dan Neely
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #38

                  Remember a 1.6gig pentium M/Core solo/Ahtlon64 is roughly as fast as a 2.5gig pentium 4.

                  -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Bradml

                    Give me a break, new keyboard


                    Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Chris S Kaiser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #39

                    You get a break for each one given. Hmmm... I imagine that might be quite a few. :laugh:

                    What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E ednrgc

                      Vista is possibly the make/break operating system for Microsoft. I actually believe that a lack of interest in Vista will send a message to Microsoft that bloat is not what the consumer wants. Most people want an operating system that is built from the ground up and does not need to be patched every 2 days. Build it correctly from the get-go, without all the user restrictions Vista applies. Check out Rick Strahl's Blog Some great points pro & con.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      syho516
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #40

                      Possibly the problem is one of cost. How many people who don't know about all the new features and what they do will want to go out and buy an OS that costs more than £100, just for upgrade versions? I don't think many will. I wont either, even though I use RC1 and like it. I just can't justify the cost. Most people won't see any big reasons to upgrade. For most home users, XP is just fine. They probably don't care that a new version looks different. After all, thats the most obvious difference between XP and Vista. Oh and Microsoft aren't good at making new releases bug free. I expect there will be several critical updates within the first few weeks. To highlight this, they are talking about SP1 already, and its only just been released! I wouldn't be suprised if Vista has a slow adoption rate. And anyway, the majority of home users will probably buy a new PC with Vista installed, which will bump up sales figures. Installing an OS is only easy when you know what your doing. Most people wont want to.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups