Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. May get a new monitor.

May get a new monitor.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++comquestiondiscussion
38 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

    █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Christian Graus
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.

    Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

    L D A A P 5 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C Christian Graus

      I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.

      Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Samsung has a comparable monitor to the acer for about 50 dollars more. After using a wide screen monitor I really want one. I like the extra horizontal resolution. I will be going with widescreen. I just may go with the samsung if it really offers better quality. I want to use my new monitor for as long as possible. Perhaps I will buy another after a while so I can have the dual screen setup. I have a cheap 17inch ViewSonic and it has been good to me. I bought it just over a year ago. I will use my old monitor for my laptop.

      █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

        █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nnamdi Onyeyiri
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Ive not used that one, but I thought I would add that I like the one I have. Its a Belinea 10 20 30 W. The first one I had did develop a fault, but I rang up and a new one was on my doorstep a couple days later.

        Nnamdi Onyeyiri

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Samsung has a comparable monitor to the acer for about 50 dollars more. After using a wide screen monitor I really want one. I like the extra horizontal resolution. I will be going with widescreen. I just may go with the samsung if it really offers better quality. I want to use my new monitor for as long as possible. Perhaps I will buy another after a while so I can have the dual screen setup. I have a cheap 17inch ViewSonic and it has been good to me. I bought it just over a year ago. I will use my old monitor for my laptop.

          █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Christian Graus
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Captain See Sharp wrote:

          I like the extra horizontal resolution.

          But it's 80 pixels more, and you lose more than that in vertical resolution. I don't get it, but if it works for you, then that's cool. My main point was to say that Samsung is a good option.

          Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Nnamdi Onyeyiri

            Ive not used that one, but I thought I would add that I like the one I have. Its a Belinea 10 20 30 W. The first one I had did develop a fault, but I rang up and a new one was on my doorstep a couple days later.

            Nnamdi Onyeyiri

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Christian Graus
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Yeah, my recommendation was at least in part because of how well they handled my dead scan line. When something goes wrong is when you find out how good a company is.

            Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Christian Graus

              Captain See Sharp wrote:

              I like the extra horizontal resolution.

              But it's 80 pixels more, and you lose more than that in vertical resolution. I don't get it, but if it works for you, then that's cool. My main point was to say that Samsung is a good option.

              Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Christian Graus wrote:

              But it's 80 pixels more, and you lose more than that in vertical resolution.

              I know, but its less expensive. I would get a 24 inch widescreen but my budget forbids me from doing so. I could buy one now, but I must save up so I can build a new system later down the road and pay bills.

              Christian Graus wrote:

              I don't get it, but if it works for you, then that's cool. My main point was to say that Samsung is a good option.

              I will definitely consider the Samsung. It was my second choice only because it is a little more expensive.

              █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christian Graus

                I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.

                Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                D Offline
                D Offline
                dighn
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                16:9 is better for multimedia use if that is ever a consideration. And imho when you are talking about screens in the 20-24 range, wide or tall doesn't really matter all that much because there's just so much space either way :)

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D dighn

                  16:9 is better for multimedia use if that is ever a consideration. And imho when you are talking about screens in the 20-24 range, wide or tall doesn't really matter all that much because there's just so much space either way :)

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Christian Graus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.

                  Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                  R S 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

                    █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    code frog 0
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    I just picked up a 22" Dell meeting your specs with a 4 year warranty for $279.


                    My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius, Commander of the Armies of the North, General of the Felix Legions, loyal servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius. Father to a murdered process, husband to a murdered thread. And I will have my affinity, in this life or the next. - Gladiator. (Okay, not quite Gladiator but close.) I work to live. I do not live to work. My clients do not seem capable of grasping this fact. Ancient of days! august Athena! where, Where are thy men of might? - Lord Byron

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Christian Graus

                      Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.

                      Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Ravi Bhavnani
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Christian Graus wrote:

                      Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.

                      Aye! Size matters (much) less than res. About time someone made a noise about this. Harrumph. /ravi

                      This is your brain on Celcius Home | Music | Articles | Freeware | Trips ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

                        █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                        V Offline
                        V Offline
                        Vega02
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Throwing in my vote for the Samsung 226BW. Roommate got one of these a few days ago, and it is absolutely beautiful. It sounds like this is the Samsung monitor you were considering as an alternative earlier in the thread. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001096[^] But the quality of LCDs seems to be going up across the board nowadays, so hopefully you'll be happy with whatever you decide. :)

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • V Vega02

                          Throwing in my vote for the Samsung 226BW. Roommate got one of these a few days ago, and it is absolutely beautiful. It sounds like this is the Samsung monitor you were considering as an alternative earlier in the thread. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001096[^] But the quality of LCDs seems to be going up across the board nowadays, so hopefully you'll be happy with whatever you decide. :)

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Oh man, I got to have that Samsung! The specs exceed my expectations and the price is right. I am definitely going to get that later this year. The price might go down which will be great.

                          █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Christian Graus

                            I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.

                            Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Andy Brummer
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            I really like 1200x1600 it lets me see much more code on the screen at one time, and with some of the code I have to work on, and a small font I might be able to see a whole method on the screen at one time. :doh:


                            Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

                              █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              cmk
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              I was looking at getting one as well over the weekend. I'm looking for a 1920x1200 (i.e 24" widescreen) to fit between my 2 19" 1280x1024. The lowest price one i found was the Acer AL2416WD: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1776111&CatId=2775[^] The reviews indicate that the picture quality is good, but 2 people had them fail within a couple months. Normally not a problem, but everyone seems to agree that Acer support is the worst. Also, a number of people ordered from tigerdirect in the US and complained about service there. The reason i didn't get it here (canada) was that tigerdirect doesn't have a return for this product, if it's bad i have to go through Acer. After reading about others problems there i've held off.

                              ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                              L A 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • C cmk

                                I was looking at getting one as well over the weekend. I'm looking for a 1920x1200 (i.e 24" widescreen) to fit between my 2 19" 1280x1024. The lowest price one i found was the Acer AL2416WD: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1776111&CatId=2775[^] The reviews indicate that the picture quality is good, but 2 people had them fail within a couple months. Normally not a problem, but everyone seems to agree that Acer support is the worst. Also, a number of people ordered from tigerdirect in the US and complained about service there. The reason i didn't get it here (canada) was that tigerdirect doesn't have a return for this product, if it's bad i have to go through Acer. After reading about others problems there i've held off.

                                ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                You are spoiled rotten. ;P Do you do any gaming?

                                █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                C 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  You are spoiled rotten. ;P Do you do any gaming?

                                  █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  cmk
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Not much, i might do a couple FPS's ever couple years. I liked the Hitman series and just finished FEAR. I'm waiting for Project Offset[^]to become more than vapour-ware. Funny enough the one i play the most is CivII. :) If i'm doing a lot of compiling i'll sometimes fire it up and play durring builds.

                                  ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

                                    █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    I have the AL2423W[^] (24", 1920x1200) in the same range and highly recommend it. If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine. :)

                                    Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Christian Graus

                                      I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.

                                      Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      Christian Graus wrote:

                                      I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ).

                                      I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me. I'm currently using an Acer AL2423W 24" widescreen TFT (1920x1200) and believe me once you've worked on that you wouldn't want to go back to a 4:3. :laugh:

                                      Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                                      S M 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C cmk

                                        I was looking at getting one as well over the weekend. I'm looking for a 1920x1200 (i.e 24" widescreen) to fit between my 2 19" 1280x1024. The lowest price one i found was the Acer AL2416WD: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1776111&CatId=2775[^] The reviews indicate that the picture quality is good, but 2 people had them fail within a couple months. Normally not a problem, but everyone seems to agree that Acer support is the worst. Also, a number of people ordered from tigerdirect in the US and complained about service there. The reason i didn't get it here (canada) was that tigerdirect doesn't have a return for this product, if it's bad i have to go through Acer. After reading about others problems there i've held off.

                                        ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        Be careful - the AL2416W doesn't have a DVI input (it's analogue only). The AL2423W (which I have) has both. :cool:

                                        Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Christian Graus

                                          Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.

                                          Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Stuart Dootson
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Christian Graus wrote:

                                          Space is significantly less important that resolution

                                          Damn right - especially with laptops. It's hard to get 15" laptop screens (the biggest you want, IMO) with better than 1400x1050 or 1440x900 these days, but I seem to remember Dell used to do up to 1900xsomething in 15", they definitely did 1600x1200 in 15".

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups