Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. May get a new monitor.

May get a new monitor.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++comquestiondiscussion
38 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christian Graus

    Captain See Sharp wrote:

    I like the extra horizontal resolution.

    But it's 80 pixels more, and you lose more than that in vertical resolution. I don't get it, but if it works for you, then that's cool. My main point was to say that Samsung is a good option.

    Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Christian Graus wrote:

    But it's 80 pixels more, and you lose more than that in vertical resolution.

    I know, but its less expensive. I would get a 24 inch widescreen but my budget forbids me from doing so. I could buy one now, but I must save up so I can build a new system later down the road and pay bills.

    Christian Graus wrote:

    I don't get it, but if it works for you, then that's cool. My main point was to say that Samsung is a good option.

    I will definitely consider the Samsung. It was my second choice only because it is a little more expensive.

    █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Christian Graus

      I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.

      Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

      D Offline
      D Offline
      dighn
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      16:9 is better for multimedia use if that is ever a consideration. And imho when you are talking about screens in the 20-24 range, wide or tall doesn't really matter all that much because there's just so much space either way :)

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D dighn

        16:9 is better for multimedia use if that is ever a consideration. And imho when you are talking about screens in the 20-24 range, wide or tall doesn't really matter all that much because there's just so much space either way :)

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Christian Graus
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.

        Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

        R S 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

          █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

          C Offline
          C Offline
          code frog 0
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          I just picked up a 22" Dell meeting your specs with a 4 year warranty for $279.


          My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius, Commander of the Armies of the North, General of the Felix Legions, loyal servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius. Father to a murdered process, husband to a murdered thread. And I will have my affinity, in this life or the next. - Gladiator. (Okay, not quite Gladiator but close.) I work to live. I do not live to work. My clients do not seem capable of grasping this fact. Ancient of days! august Athena! where, Where are thy men of might? - Lord Byron

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Christian Graus

            Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.

            Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Ravi Bhavnani
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Christian Graus wrote:

            Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.

            Aye! Size matters (much) less than res. About time someone made a noise about this. Harrumph. /ravi

            This is your brain on Celcius Home | Music | Articles | Freeware | Trips ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

              █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

              V Offline
              V Offline
              Vega02
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Throwing in my vote for the Samsung 226BW. Roommate got one of these a few days ago, and it is absolutely beautiful. It sounds like this is the Samsung monitor you were considering as an alternative earlier in the thread. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001096[^] But the quality of LCDs seems to be going up across the board nowadays, so hopefully you'll be happy with whatever you decide. :)

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V Vega02

                Throwing in my vote for the Samsung 226BW. Roommate got one of these a few days ago, and it is absolutely beautiful. It sounds like this is the Samsung monitor you were considering as an alternative earlier in the thread. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001096[^] But the quality of LCDs seems to be going up across the board nowadays, so hopefully you'll be happy with whatever you decide. :)

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Oh man, I got to have that Samsung! The specs exceed my expectations and the price is right. I am definitely going to get that later this year. The price might go down which will be great.

                █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christian Graus

                  I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.

                  Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Andy Brummer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  I really like 1200x1600 it lets me see much more code on the screen at one time, and with some of the code I have to work on, and a small font I might be able to see a whole method on the screen at one time. :doh:


                  Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

                    █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    cmk
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    I was looking at getting one as well over the weekend. I'm looking for a 1920x1200 (i.e 24" widescreen) to fit between my 2 19" 1280x1024. The lowest price one i found was the Acer AL2416WD: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1776111&CatId=2775[^] The reviews indicate that the picture quality is good, but 2 people had them fail within a couple months. Normally not a problem, but everyone seems to agree that Acer support is the worst. Also, a number of people ordered from tigerdirect in the US and complained about service there. The reason i didn't get it here (canada) was that tigerdirect doesn't have a return for this product, if it's bad i have to go through Acer. After reading about others problems there i've held off.

                    ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                    L A 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • C cmk

                      I was looking at getting one as well over the weekend. I'm looking for a 1920x1200 (i.e 24" widescreen) to fit between my 2 19" 1280x1024. The lowest price one i found was the Acer AL2416WD: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1776111&CatId=2775[^] The reviews indicate that the picture quality is good, but 2 people had them fail within a couple months. Normally not a problem, but everyone seems to agree that Acer support is the worst. Also, a number of people ordered from tigerdirect in the US and complained about service there. The reason i didn't get it here (canada) was that tigerdirect doesn't have a return for this product, if it's bad i have to go through Acer. After reading about others problems there i've held off.

                      ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      You are spoiled rotten. ;P Do you do any gaming?

                      █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        You are spoiled rotten. ;P Do you do any gaming?

                        █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        cmk
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Not much, i might do a couple FPS's ever couple years. I liked the Hitman series and just finished FEAR. I'm waiting for Project Offset[^]to become more than vapour-ware. Funny enough the one i play the most is CivII. :) If i'm doing a lot of compiling i'll sometimes fire it up and play durring builds.

                        ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

                          █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          I have the AL2423W[^] (24", 1920x1200) in the same range and highly recommend it. If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine. :)

                          Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Christian Graus

                            I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.

                            Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Christian Graus wrote:

                            I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ).

                            I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me. I'm currently using an Acer AL2423W 24" widescreen TFT (1920x1200) and believe me once you've worked on that you wouldn't want to go back to a 4:3. :laugh:

                            Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                            S M 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • C cmk

                              I was looking at getting one as well over the weekend. I'm looking for a 1920x1200 (i.e 24" widescreen) to fit between my 2 19" 1280x1024. The lowest price one i found was the Acer AL2416WD: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1776111&CatId=2775[^] The reviews indicate that the picture quality is good, but 2 people had them fail within a couple months. Normally not a problem, but everyone seems to agree that Acer support is the worst. Also, a number of people ordered from tigerdirect in the US and complained about service there. The reason i didn't get it here (canada) was that tigerdirect doesn't have a return for this product, if it's bad i have to go through Acer. After reading about others problems there i've held off.

                              ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Be careful - the AL2416W doesn't have a DVI input (it's analogue only). The AL2423W (which I have) has both. :cool:

                              Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Christian Graus

                                Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.

                                Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stuart Dootson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                Christian Graus wrote:

                                Space is significantly less important that resolution

                                Damn right - especially with laptops. It's hard to get 15" laptop screens (the biggest you want, IMO) with better than 1400x1050 or 1440x900 these days, but I seem to remember Dell used to do up to 1900xsomething in 15", they definitely did 1600x1200 in 15".

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Anna Jayne Metcalfe

                                  I have the AL2423W[^] (24", 1920x1200) in the same range and highly recommend it. If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine. :)

                                  Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

                                  If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine.

                                  I bought an Acer laptop in November and I am extremely satisfied with it. People have told me Acer is crap but they seem to make good products. I would really love to have two 22 inch monitors. Perhaps I can find the money somehow.

                                  █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Anna Jayne Metcalfe

                                    Christian Graus wrote:

                                    I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ).

                                    I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me. I'm currently using an Acer AL2423W 24" widescreen TFT (1920x1200) and believe me once you've worked on that you wouldn't want to go back to a 4:3. :laugh:

                                    Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stuart Dootson
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

                                    I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me.

                                    Try having less than 300 characters per line in hte code editor, then ;P With my 20" TFT @ work (1600x1200), I can get up to 150chars/line in Visual Studio, but all I have taking up horizontal space is the code editor and the solution explorer, class view and resource view, which I dock so they're tabbed items in the same space. However, as I don't do too much GUI programming (or 'normal' Windows programming, for that matter), I don't really care about having designer windows around - the code's the only thing that matters!

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Stuart Dootson

                                      Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

                                      I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me.

                                      Try having less than 300 characters per line in hte code editor, then ;P With my 20" TFT @ work (1600x1200), I can get up to 150chars/line in Visual Studio, but all I have taking up horizontal space is the code editor and the solution explorer, class view and resource view, which I dock so they're tabbed items in the same space. However, as I don't do too much GUI programming (or 'normal' Windows programming, for that matter), I don't really care about having designer windows around - the code's the only thing that matters!

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      It must be just me then! :-> I typically work with two vertical panes in the main area - one for code, and the other for help topics/browser. ;) With the solution explorer etc. docked on the right, I really appreciate the extra 320 pixels width. :-O

                                      Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

                                        If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine.

                                        I bought an Acer laptop in November and I am extremely satisfied with it. People have told me Acer is crap but they seem to make good products. I would really love to have two 22 inch monitors. Perhaps I can find the money somehow.

                                        █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        Maybe, indeed. My experience of Acer laptops has been good so far (I'm on my second - and 8215WLMi; before that I had an 8006LMi). They are extremely easy to maintain and upgrade (diskl, memory etc. are accessible), and I've no complaints about reliability other than that I've yet to have any laptop last more than 2 1/2 years of the sort of use I give them, and in that respect Acer are no exception. :rose:

                                        Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.

                                          █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          realJSOP
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          I just ordered a Samsung 225BW. It was one of the few 22-inch monitors that has a height-adjustable stand. It was only (*)$290 at Amazon. It'll be here tomorrow. (*)Actually, the cheapest price for a new one was $269, but the vendor had a less than spectacular customer rating, so I chose to go with a fulfillment from Amazon itself.

                                          "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                                          -----
                                          "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups