May get a new monitor.
-
You are spoiled rotten. ;P Do you do any gaming?
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Not much, i might do a couple FPS's ever couple years. I liked the Hitman series and just finished FEAR. I'm waiting for Project Offset[^]to become more than vapour-ware. Funny enough the one i play the most is CivII. :) If i'm doing a lot of compiling i'll sometimes fire it up and play durring builds.
...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set
-
I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
I have the AL2423W[^] (24", 1920x1200) in the same range and highly recommend it. If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine. :)
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
-
I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
Christian Graus wrote:
I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ).
I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me. I'm currently using an Acer AL2423W 24" widescreen TFT (1920x1200) and believe me once you've worked on that you wouldn't want to go back to a 4:3. :laugh:
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
-
I was looking at getting one as well over the weekend. I'm looking for a 1920x1200 (i.e 24" widescreen) to fit between my 2 19" 1280x1024. The lowest price one i found was the Acer AL2416WD: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1776111&CatId=2775[^] The reviews indicate that the picture quality is good, but 2 people had them fail within a couple months. Normally not a problem, but everyone seems to agree that Acer support is the worst. Also, a number of people ordered from tigerdirect in the US and complained about service there. The reason i didn't get it here (canada) was that tigerdirect doesn't have a return for this product, if it's bad i have to go through Acer. After reading about others problems there i've held off.
...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set
Be careful - the AL2416W doesn't have a DVI input (it's analogue only). The AL2423W (which I have) has both. :cool:
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
-
Space is significantly less important that resolution, IMO.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
Christian Graus wrote:
Space is significantly less important that resolution
Damn right - especially with laptops. It's hard to get 15" laptop screens (the biggest you want, IMO) with better than 1400x1050 or 1440x900 these days, but I seem to remember Dell used to do up to 1900xsomething in 15", they definitely did 1600x1200 in 15".
-
I have the AL2423W[^] (24", 1920x1200) in the same range and highly recommend it. If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine. :)
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:
If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine.
I bought an Acer laptop in November and I am extremely satisfied with it. People have told me Acer is crap but they seem to make good products. I would really love to have two 22 inch monitors. Perhaps I can find the money somehow.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Christian Graus wrote:
I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ).
I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me. I'm currently using an Acer AL2423W 24" widescreen TFT (1920x1200) and believe me once you've worked on that you wouldn't want to go back to a 4:3. :laugh:
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:
I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me.
Try having less than 300 characters per line in hte code editor, then ;P With my 20" TFT @ work (1600x1200), I can get up to 150chars/line in Visual Studio, but all I have taking up horizontal space is the code editor and the solution explorer, class view and resource view, which I dock so they're tabbed items in the same space. However, as I don't do too much GUI programming (or 'normal' Windows programming, for that matter), I don't really care about having designer windows around - the code's the only thing that matters!
-
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:
I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me.
Try having less than 300 characters per line in hte code editor, then ;P With my 20" TFT @ work (1600x1200), I can get up to 150chars/line in Visual Studio, but all I have taking up horizontal space is the code editor and the solution explorer, class view and resource view, which I dock so they're tabbed items in the same space. However, as I don't do too much GUI programming (or 'normal' Windows programming, for that matter), I don't really care about having designer windows around - the code's the only thing that matters!
It must be just me then! :-> I typically work with two vertical panes in the main area - one for code, and the other for help topics/browser. ;) With the solution explorer etc. docked on the right, I really appreciate the extra 320 pixels width. :-O
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
-
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:
If the one you've chosen is up to the same standards (and there's no reason to expect it won't be, given my experience of Acer) it should be fine.
I bought an Acer laptop in November and I am extremely satisfied with it. People have told me Acer is crap but they seem to make good products. I would really love to have two 22 inch monitors. Perhaps I can find the money somehow.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Maybe, indeed. My experience of Acer laptops has been good so far (I'm on my second - and 8215WLMi; before that I had an 8006LMi). They are extremely easy to maintain and upgrade (diskl, memory etc. are accessible), and I've no complaints about reliability other than that I've yet to have any laptop last more than 2 1/2 years of the sort of use I give them, and in that respect Acer are no exception. :rose:
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
-
I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
I just ordered a Samsung 225BW. It was one of the few 22-inch monitors that has a height-adjustable stand. It was only (*)$290 at Amazon. It'll be here tomorrow. (*)Actually, the cheapest price for a new one was $269, but the vendor had a less than spectacular customer rating, so I chose to go with a fulfillment from Amazon itself.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
It must be just me then! :-> I typically work with two vertical panes in the main area - one for code, and the other for help topics/browser. ;) With the solution explorer etc. docked on the right, I really appreciate the extra 320 pixels width. :-O
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:
I really appreciate the extra 320 pixels width.
What is this? Carry on Computing?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:
I really appreciate the extra 320 pixels width.
What is this? Carry on Computing?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
Yeah...didn't you see them at Brighton Pride last year? They were just behind the "Carry on Cruising" float, if I remember rightly. ;P
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
-
I am looking at getting a new monitor this year. I would like to get a monitor with the resolution of 1680x1050. It will either be a 20 inch or 22 inch. This acer looks like a good deal and it seems to be of good quality. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2549197&Tab=2&NoMapp=0[^] I have seen that same monitor at bestbuy but it was not set at its native resolution so I couldn't see how good it really was. What do you think? I would like any advice you have.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Except for the small fraction of items on sale (typically slowly processed rebates, or bundled with an AV program that'll hit you up with a charge if you don't cancel the subscription) TD is generally one of the more expensive online retailers.
-- CleaKO The sad part about this instance is that none of the users ever said anything [about the problem]. Pete O`Hanlon Doesn't that just tell you everything you need to know about users?
-
Yeah...didn't you see them at Brighton Pride last year? They were just behind the "Carry on Cruising" float, if I remember rightly. ;P
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
:laugh::laugh::laugh:Brings a new meaning to Stelios Easycruise.:-D
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ). I have a Samsung SyncMaster 204B. It still looks great after a year, and when I did get a dead scanline, they sent me a new monitor, right away. I have only good things to say about Samsung monitors.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
Actually, Visual Studio works best on 3 4:3 Monitors: one for the editor environment, one for MSDN and one for all the tool windows. I prefer 2 4:3 over one 16:9.
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighist -
Actually, Visual Studio works best on 3 4:3 Monitors: one for the editor environment, one for MSDN and one for all the tool windows. I prefer 2 4:3 over one 16:9.
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighistmy 2nd 4:3 (actually 5:4 unless the pixels are rectangular but who's counting) is for firefox.
-- CleaKO The sad part about this instance is that none of the users ever said anything [about the problem]. Pete O`Hanlon Doesn't that just tell you everything you need to know about users?
-
:laugh::laugh::laugh:Brings a new meaning to Stelios Easycruise.:-D
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
I was't joking about the "Carry on Cruising" float! ;)
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
-
Except for the small fraction of items on sale (typically slowly processed rebates, or bundled with an AV program that'll hit you up with a charge if you don't cancel the subscription) TD is generally one of the more expensive online retailers.
-- CleaKO The sad part about this instance is that none of the users ever said anything [about the problem]. Pete O`Hanlon Doesn't that just tell you everything you need to know about users?
dan neely wrote:
TD is generally one of the more expensive online retailers.
Yeah, but there website is easy to navigate. When I buy it I will probably go with NewEgg unless I find a better deal.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Christian Graus wrote:
I don't get why everyone is after 16:9 monitors. Visual Studio works best at 4:#, in my book. I have 1600x1200, and it works a treat. I have 2 x 1200x1024 as well ( and room for more, if I ever want to buy more ).
I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides, and I end up having to autohide displays - which bugs the hell out of me. I'm currently using an Acer AL2423W 24" widescreen TFT (1920x1200) and believe me once you've worked on that you wouldn't want to go back to a 4:3. :laugh:
Anna :rose: Linting the day away :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:
I find with 4:3 monitors that I never have sufficient width to dock the displays I want. The code editor just gets "squeazed" too much at the sides
Me too. I keep VS stretched across two 21" monitors...one entire monitor just for the code editing window, and the other monitor has the docked windows. I could never go back to a single 4:3. I dream of two widescreens! Mark
"Posting a VB.NET question in the C++ forum will end in tears." Chris Maunder
-
I just picked up a 22" Dell meeting your specs with a 4 year warranty for $279.
My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius, Commander of the Armies of the North, General of the Felix Legions, loyal servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius. Father to a murdered process, husband to a murdered thread. And I will have my affinity, in this life or the next. - Gladiator. (Okay, not quite Gladiator but close.) I work to live. I do not live to work. My clients do not seem capable of grasping this fact. Ancient of days! august Athena! where, Where are thy men of might? - Lord Byron
code-frog wrote:
I just picked up a 22" Dell meeting your specs with a 4 year warranty for $279
Really? Have a link?? :)
"Posting a VB.NET question in the C++ forum will end in tears." Chris Maunder
