Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. London 'Terror Attacks'

London 'Terror Attacks'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
securityquestion
145 Posts 23 Posters 220 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 7 73Zeppelin

    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

    One reason that the IRA were so effective is that so many of them were well trained British agents.

    Close but not quite. If you look hard at the evidence you will see that not only were they British agents they were also all ex-McDonald's Hamburglar-costume-wearing employees. Their ring-leader was actually the lead-Ronald-McDonald character in Dublin for 3.1415 years. The money they would make at their day-jobs as McDonald's costume employees would be funneled into the IRA's ultra-secret weapons aquisition program which had direct links with North Korea, Iran and a small cargo-cult colony on Bora-Bora that worshipped Prince Charles as a God (no longer in existence due to forced and brutal conversion to Arian Christianity by a sub-sect of the Vatican, but I won't go into that plot right now). Since the fall of the Bora-Bora colony, the natural successor was, of course, Bin Laden who had spent much of his childhood on Bora Bora where he had developed a deep hatred for Prince Charles, his environmental policies and the West in general. And that's how we got to where we are today.


    R Offline
    R Offline
    Red Stateler
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    73Zeppelin wrote:

    Since the fall of the Bora-Bora colony, the natural successor was, of course, Bin Laden who had spent much of his childhood on Bora Bora where he had developed a deep hatred for Prince Charles, his environmental policies and the West in general.

    I went to Bora Bora two years ago. My cover was our "honeymoon". In reality I was there to finish off the final fragments of the Nakagawas...The Japanese family that sat as head of the Bora Bora colony, which is less commonly known as the Gloup-Soups. You were probably only aware of some of their more recent acts. You may or may not be aware that they actually bombed Pearl Harbor. Japan itself had nothing to do with it. They established the international military-industrial complex. Now they are no more. There is only me.

    7 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 7 73Zeppelin

      Matthew Faithfull wrote:

      One reason that the IRA were so effective is that so many of them were well trained British agents.

      Close but not quite. If you look hard at the evidence you will see that not only were they British agents they were also all ex-McDonald's Hamburglar-costume-wearing employees. Their ring-leader was actually the lead-Ronald-McDonald character in Dublin for 3.1415 years. The money they would make at their day-jobs as McDonald's costume employees would be funneled into the IRA's ultra-secret weapons aquisition program which had direct links with North Korea, Iran and a small cargo-cult colony on Bora-Bora that worshipped Prince Charles as a God (no longer in existence due to forced and brutal conversion to Arian Christianity by a sub-sect of the Vatican, but I won't go into that plot right now). Since the fall of the Bora-Bora colony, the natural successor was, of course, Bin Laden who had spent much of his childhood on Bora Bora where he had developed a deep hatred for Prince Charles, his environmental policies and the West in general. And that's how we got to where we are today.


      M Offline
      M Offline
      Matthew Faithfull
      wrote on last edited by
      #49

      Not bad, perhaps you should appy to MI5 to write the 'plot' for the next flase flag attack. You'd better hope they don't f%^& it up with another fake Bin Laden though or you'll be a laughing stock.:laugh:

      Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Matthew Faithfull

        I've run out, could you ship me some more from your secret underground factory in Texas staffed by greys please Red ;P

        Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Red Stateler
        wrote on last edited by
        #50

        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

        I've run out, could you ship me some more from your secret underground factory in Texas staffed by greys please Red

        Why on earth would I do that? I actually manufacture the fear rays. I'd be in breach of contract with Britain.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Red Stateler

          73Zeppelin wrote:

          Since the fall of the Bora-Bora colony, the natural successor was, of course, Bin Laden who had spent much of his childhood on Bora Bora where he had developed a deep hatred for Prince Charles, his environmental policies and the West in general.

          I went to Bora Bora two years ago. My cover was our "honeymoon". In reality I was there to finish off the final fragments of the Nakagawas...The Japanese family that sat as head of the Bora Bora colony, which is less commonly known as the Gloup-Soups. You were probably only aware of some of their more recent acts. You may or may not be aware that they actually bombed Pearl Harbor. Japan itself had nothing to do with it. They established the international military-industrial complex. Now they are no more. There is only me.

          7 Offline
          7 Offline
          73Zeppelin
          wrote on last edited by
          #51

          Red Stateler wrote:

          You may or may not be aware that they actually bombed Pearl Harbor.

          I had suspected this connection for years! At long last, I have the proof!

          Red Stateler wrote:

          They established the international military-industrial complex. Now they are no more. There is only me.

          The plan proceeds as expected. Find the jade monkey before the next full moon... More communications will follow.


          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Craster

            Actually, he's not. He's just telling me I'm wrong, and telling me what I must do. That's not reason, that's reasonless dissention.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #52

            Craster wrote:

            reasonless dissention

            Is that supposed to be a cack-handed complement?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 7 73Zeppelin

              You know that I know that you know that I know that even Richard knows you're being silly and won't admit that we're collectively right. That's okay. Everyone else knows this too...


              C Offline
              C Offline
              Craster
              wrote on last edited by
              #53

              73Zeppelin wrote:

              You know that I know that you know that I know that even Richard knows you're being silly and won't admit that we're collectively right.

              Good to know.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 7 73Zeppelin

                Red Stateler wrote:

                You may or may not be aware that they actually bombed Pearl Harbor.

                I had suspected this connection for years! At long last, I have the proof!

                Red Stateler wrote:

                They established the international military-industrial complex. Now they are no more. There is only me.

                The plan proceeds as expected. Find the jade monkey before the next full moon... More communications will follow.


                R Offline
                R Offline
                Red Stateler
                wrote on last edited by
                #54

                73Zeppelin wrote:

                The plan proceeds as expected. Find the jade monkey before the next full moon...

                The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.

                7 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Red Stateler

                  73Zeppelin wrote:

                  The plan proceeds as expected. Find the jade monkey before the next full moon...

                  The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.

                  7 Offline
                  7 Offline
                  73Zeppelin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #55

                  Red Stateler wrote:

                  The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.

                  Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.


                  R M 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • 7 73Zeppelin

                    Red Stateler wrote:

                    The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.

                    Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.


                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Red Stateler
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #56

                    73Zeppelin wrote:

                    Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.

                    THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................

                    7 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 7 73Zeppelin

                      Red Stateler wrote:

                      The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.

                      Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.


                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Matthew Faithfull
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #57

                      :laugh: Just how, you have no idea.

                      Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Craster

                        Yeah, that last bit was unnecessary, sorry about that. Remember though, that my point was not about attacks that killed people - it was purely about having the simple ability to create explosive devices that work, and all parties in NI proved that they can do that will significantly more success than the current crop of middle eastern terrorists.

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Ryan Roberts
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #58

                        Craster wrote:

                        all parties in NI proved that they can do that

                        NI was a near war zone for decades, with large arms stockpiles that were beyond the reach of the UK authorities. Putting a pound of semtex into a bag and catching the 7:30 back from Lahore isn't an option thankfully. If it were, my guess is we would have seen a lot worse.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Red Stateler

                          73Zeppelin wrote:

                          Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.

                          THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................

                          7 Offline
                          7 Offline
                          73Zeppelin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #59

                          Red Stateler wrote:

                          THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................

                          DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! :doh: Now I have to finance Plan B: the cornering of the aluminum market.


                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 7 73Zeppelin

                            Red Stateler wrote:

                            THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................

                            DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! :doh: Now I have to finance Plan B: the cornering of the aluminum market.


                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Matthew Faithfull
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #60

                            Surely you meant SPAM! SPAM! SPAM! SPAM! :doh:

                            Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Craster

                              Rob Graham wrote:

                              So you would prefer that they had been successful?

                              No. I would prefer that the scale of response was in some way related to the scale of the threat. We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise. Compare the amount of deaths and injury due to terrorism with the amount of deaths and injury due to dangerous driving, or gang warfare. Then compare the amount of time and money that is being spent on attempting to resolve these issues.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #61

                              Craster wrote:

                              We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.

                              OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?

                              C 7 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Craster wrote:

                                We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.

                                OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Craster
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #62

                                As proved last week - prevention had nothing to do with the failure of these attacks.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Craster wrote:

                                  We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.

                                  OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?

                                  7 Offline
                                  7 Offline
                                  73Zeppelin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #63

                                  Mike Mullikin wrote:

                                  OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?

                                  In the world of anti-logic? No. It's bad.


                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Craster

                                    As proved last week - prevention had nothing to do with the failure of these attacks.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #64

                                    Sorry Craster, but you must live on some strange cloud.

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Sorry Craster, but you must live on some strange cloud.

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      Craster
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #65

                                      Fair enough. Still - at least it's a happy cloud, not a quivering-in-fear cloud.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Craster

                                        Rob Graham wrote:

                                        So you would prefer that they had been successful?

                                        No. I would prefer that the scale of response was in some way related to the scale of the threat. We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise. Compare the amount of deaths and injury due to terrorism with the amount of deaths and injury due to dangerous driving, or gang warfare. Then compare the amount of time and money that is being spent on attempting to resolve these issues.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Rob Graham
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #66

                                        Craster wrote:

                                        We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.

                                        Perhaps you are confusing cause and effect here... Or perhaps you would prefer that the "amateur" terrorists whose early attempts fail just be ignored until they actually succeed in killing a few thousand people?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Craster

                                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                          Dummy bomb, non-working bomb, or real active bomb. Does it matter? What is the different? The basis of terror is just that - TERROR

                                          Exactly. Therefore, the correct way to render such an attack impotent is to point and laugh at the incompetance. Hysterical reporting and filling the streets with armed police play right into the hands of those aiming to cause terror.

                                          A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          AndyKEnZ
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #67

                                          Craster wrote:

                                          Exactly. Therefore, the correct way to render such an attack impotent is to point and laugh at the incompetance.

                                          I can see where you're coming from, but pointing and laughing until something serious happens isn't what's called for here. What's needed is an honest appraisal of their motivation, if it's brain-washing in a Madrasa then something will have to be done as people bought up this way are just not compatible with life in Europe. Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.

                                          R 7 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups