London 'Terror Attacks'
-
Actually, he's not. He's just telling me I'm wrong, and telling me what I must do. That's not reason, that's reasonless dissention.
-
You know that I know that you know that I know that even Richard knows you're being silly and won't admit that we're collectively right. That's okay. Everyone else knows this too...
-
Red Stateler wrote:
You may or may not be aware that they actually bombed Pearl Harbor.
I had suspected this connection for years! At long last, I have the proof!
Red Stateler wrote:
They established the international military-industrial complex. Now they are no more. There is only me.
The plan proceeds as expected. Find the jade monkey before the next full moon... More communications will follow.
73Zeppelin wrote:
The plan proceeds as expected. Find the jade monkey before the next full moon...
The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
The plan proceeds as expected. Find the jade monkey before the next full moon...
The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.
Red Stateler wrote:
The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.
Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.
Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.
73Zeppelin wrote:
Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.
THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................
-
Red Stateler wrote:
The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.
Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.
:laugh: Just how, you have no idea.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Yeah, that last bit was unnecessary, sorry about that. Remember though, that my point was not about attacks that killed people - it was purely about having the simple ability to create explosive devices that work, and all parties in NI proved that they can do that will significantly more success than the current crop of middle eastern terrorists.
Craster wrote:
all parties in NI proved that they can do that
NI was a near war zone for decades, with large arms stockpiles that were beyond the reach of the UK authorities. Putting a pound of semtex into a bag and catching the 7:30 back from Lahore isn't an option thankfully. If it were, my guess is we would have seen a lot worse.
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.
THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................
Red Stateler wrote:
THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................
DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! :doh: Now I have to finance Plan B: the cornering of the aluminum market.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................
DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! :doh: Now I have to finance Plan B: the cornering of the aluminum market.
Surely you meant SPAM! SPAM! SPAM! SPAM! :doh:
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Rob Graham wrote:
So you would prefer that they had been successful?
No. I would prefer that the scale of response was in some way related to the scale of the threat. We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise. Compare the amount of deaths and injury due to terrorism with the amount of deaths and injury due to dangerous driving, or gang warfare. Then compare the amount of time and money that is being spent on attempting to resolve these issues.
Craster wrote:
We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.
OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?
-
Craster wrote:
We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.
OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?
Mike Mullikin wrote:
OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?
In the world of anti-logic? No. It's bad.
-
Craster wrote:
We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.
OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?
-
Rob Graham wrote:
So you would prefer that they had been successful?
No. I would prefer that the scale of response was in some way related to the scale of the threat. We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise. Compare the amount of deaths and injury due to terrorism with the amount of deaths and injury due to dangerous driving, or gang warfare. Then compare the amount of time and money that is being spent on attempting to resolve these issues.
Craster wrote:
We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.
Perhaps you are confusing cause and effect here... Or perhaps you would prefer that the "amateur" terrorists whose early attempts fail just be ignored until they actually succeed in killing a few thousand people?
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Dummy bomb, non-working bomb, or real active bomb. Does it matter? What is the different? The basis of terror is just that - TERROR
Exactly. Therefore, the correct way to render such an attack impotent is to point and laugh at the incompetance. Hysterical reporting and filling the streets with armed police play right into the hands of those aiming to cause terror.
Craster wrote:
Exactly. Therefore, the correct way to render such an attack impotent is to point and laugh at the incompetance.
I can see where you're coming from, but pointing and laughing until something serious happens isn't what's called for here. What's needed is an honest appraisal of their motivation, if it's brain-washing in a Madrasa then something will have to be done as people bought up this way are just not compatible with life in Europe. Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.
-
Craster wrote:
Exactly. Therefore, the correct way to render such an attack impotent is to point and laugh at the incompetance.
I can see where you're coming from, but pointing and laughing until something serious happens isn't what's called for here. What's needed is an honest appraisal of their motivation, if it's brain-washing in a Madrasa then something will have to be done as people bought up this way are just not compatible with life in Europe. Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.
I think a better solution would be to let a terrorist bombing force you to change your vote to the complacent socialist candidate. Right?....Am I right?
-
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.
I think a better solution would be to let a terrorist bombing force you to change your vote to the complacent socialist candidate. Right?....Am I right?
-
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Democracy frightens you does it?
In Spain, Terrorists dictate democracy. Remember how the other candidate was winning in all the polls. And then terrorists bombed that train station. And then how all you Spaniards got scared and voted for the wussy candidate? Yeah. That's the way to do it!
-
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Democracy frightens you does it?
In Spain, Terrorists dictate democracy. Remember how the other candidate was winning in all the polls. And then terrorists bombed that train station. And then how all you Spaniards got scared and voted for the wussy candidate? Yeah. That's the way to do it!