London 'Terror Attacks'
-
Red Stateler wrote:
The cow was hit by the truck. Hamburgers will rain down upon us with the next lunar eclipse.
Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.
:laugh: Just how, you have no idea.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Yeah, that last bit was unnecessary, sorry about that. Remember though, that my point was not about attacks that killed people - it was purely about having the simple ability to create explosive devices that work, and all parties in NI proved that they can do that will significantly more success than the current crop of middle eastern terrorists.
Craster wrote:
all parties in NI proved that they can do that
NI was a near war zone for decades, with large arms stockpiles that were beyond the reach of the UK authorities. Putting a pound of semtex into a bag and catching the 7:30 back from Lahore isn't an option thankfully. If it were, my guess is we would have seen a lot worse.
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
Understood. The tin-foil hat is off. The Faithfull target is hot. Repeat; the Faithfull target is hot.
THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................
Red Stateler wrote:
THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................
DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! :doh: Now I have to finance Plan B: the cornering of the aluminum market.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
THE FOIL HAT IS STILL ON! REPEAT! TARGET HAS NOT REMOVED FOIL HAT! ABORT!!! ABORT!!! So much blood....So much carnage...Why?...........Why?...................
DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! :doh: Now I have to finance Plan B: the cornering of the aluminum market.
Surely you meant SPAM! SPAM! SPAM! SPAM! :doh:
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Rob Graham wrote:
So you would prefer that they had been successful?
No. I would prefer that the scale of response was in some way related to the scale of the threat. We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise. Compare the amount of deaths and injury due to terrorism with the amount of deaths and injury due to dangerous driving, or gang warfare. Then compare the amount of time and money that is being spent on attempting to resolve these issues.
Craster wrote:
We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.
OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?
-
Craster wrote:
We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.
OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?
-
Craster wrote:
We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.
OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?
Mike Mullikin wrote:
OR "We are spending vast sums of money on prevention and terror attacks are repeatedly failing to materialise." Isn't that a good thing?
In the world of anti-logic? No. It's bad.
-
Rob Graham wrote:
So you would prefer that they had been successful?
No. I would prefer that the scale of response was in some way related to the scale of the threat. We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise. Compare the amount of deaths and injury due to terrorism with the amount of deaths and injury due to dangerous driving, or gang warfare. Then compare the amount of time and money that is being spent on attempting to resolve these issues.
Craster wrote:
We are spending vast sums of money on prevention of terror attacks that are repeatedly failing to materialise.
Perhaps you are confusing cause and effect here... Or perhaps you would prefer that the "amateur" terrorists whose early attempts fail just be ignored until they actually succeed in killing a few thousand people?
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Dummy bomb, non-working bomb, or real active bomb. Does it matter? What is the different? The basis of terror is just that - TERROR
Exactly. Therefore, the correct way to render such an attack impotent is to point and laugh at the incompetance. Hysterical reporting and filling the streets with armed police play right into the hands of those aiming to cause terror.
Craster wrote:
Exactly. Therefore, the correct way to render such an attack impotent is to point and laugh at the incompetance.
I can see where you're coming from, but pointing and laughing until something serious happens isn't what's called for here. What's needed is an honest appraisal of their motivation, if it's brain-washing in a Madrasa then something will have to be done as people bought up this way are just not compatible with life in Europe. Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.
-
Craster wrote:
Exactly. Therefore, the correct way to render such an attack impotent is to point and laugh at the incompetance.
I can see where you're coming from, but pointing and laughing until something serious happens isn't what's called for here. What's needed is an honest appraisal of their motivation, if it's brain-washing in a Madrasa then something will have to be done as people bought up this way are just not compatible with life in Europe. Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.
I think a better solution would be to let a terrorist bombing force you to change your vote to the complacent socialist candidate. Right?....Am I right?
-
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Maybe recognition for past wrongs made against the Muslim world would be a good starting place.
I think a better solution would be to let a terrorist bombing force you to change your vote to the complacent socialist candidate. Right?....Am I right?
-
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Democracy frightens you does it?
In Spain, Terrorists dictate democracy. Remember how the other candidate was winning in all the polls. And then terrorists bombed that train station. And then how all you Spaniards got scared and voted for the wussy candidate? Yeah. That's the way to do it!
-
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Democracy frightens you does it?
In Spain, Terrorists dictate democracy. Remember how the other candidate was winning in all the polls. And then terrorists bombed that train station. And then how all you Spaniards got scared and voted for the wussy candidate? Yeah. That's the way to do it!
-
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Democracy frightens you does it?
In Spain, Terrorists dictate democracy. Remember how the other candidate was winning in all the polls. And then terrorists bombed that train station. And then how all you Spaniards got scared and voted for the wussy candidate? Yeah. That's the way to do it!
Maybe the Spanish are not as daft as you think and they just voted out the government who's security people supplied the explosives in the first place and killed the patsy bombers to cover it up. Yes in Spain terrorists were dictating democracy but only because they were accidentally voted into power, which is what you get if you start copying the USA. To understand this you need to know that I'm using the non politically correct and original meaning or the word terrorist. Someone who attacks soft targets like civillians with the goal of creating fear amongst the general population usually for political ends. Not the NWO definition of terrorist, anyone who George doesn't like so he puts them on the list.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Stupid simplistic summing-up there and quite simply incorrect I suggest Google. The people voted based on beliefs not the person with the best hair. Hey, like, do you happen to know what country Spain is in man?
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Stupid simplistic summing-up there and quite simply incorrect I suggest Google.
I don't need to Google it. Those are the facts. Just before the election, Spain supported, by a wide margin, the candidate that supported the war on terror. Right after the bombings, they switched their vote to the complacent socialist because they were all scared into doing so. You didn't vote on the candidate with the best hair...You voted for the candidate that Islamic terrorists told you to vote for.
AndyKEnZ wrote:
Hey, like, do you happen to know what country Spain is in man?
The one that, I'm ashamed to admit, my grandfather is from.
-
Maybe the Spanish are not as daft as you think and they just voted out the government who's security people supplied the explosives in the first place and killed the patsy bombers to cover it up. Yes in Spain terrorists were dictating democracy but only because they were accidentally voted into power, which is what you get if you start copying the USA. To understand this you need to know that I'm using the non politically correct and original meaning or the word terrorist. Someone who attacks soft targets like civillians with the goal of creating fear amongst the general population usually for political ends. Not the NWO definition of terrorist, anyone who George doesn't like so he puts them on the list.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Ahhhh....Go suck an egg.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
I'm still king of the 1-votes. Bow before your master.
I know. You rule the 1 vote demographic. I really can't say more as there's a government mule here telling me to stop speaking my mind. Damned repression...
73Zeppelin wrote:
I really can't say more as there's a government mule here telling me to stop speaking my mind.
Well aren't you special? We only get a donkey over here.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash 24/04/2004
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
I really can't say more as there's a government mule here telling me to stop speaking my mind.
Well aren't you special? We only get a donkey over here.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash 24/04/2004
Michael Martin wrote:
We only get a donkey over here.
No Kangaroo.
Regards, Satips.:rose: