I hate MSDN (the web version)
-
I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
-
I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
Why stop there - I'm none too keen on the none web version of MSDN now as well. It used to be good, but Microsoft systematically removed the bits that made it easy to use and relevant.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
-
Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article
Greets! Joel
-
Why stop there - I'm none too keen on the none web version of MSDN now as well. It used to be good, but Microsoft systematically removed the bits that made it easy to use and relevant.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
Not only that, but the new layout is so ungodly slow it's utterly frustrating to do anything with it at all. On the upside, at least there's something (try looking up help with *nix man :) ). This does bring to mind a question: What did the MSDN developers develop this on? Do they have some uber fast 4 Gb internal network that they use? Wouldn't the poor performance have cropped up? And if not, why not?
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog
-
I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
Maximilien wrote:
site lab msdn microsoft
I think they're still using a hidden
site:lab.msdn.microsoft.com
search parameter with their Live Search engine. Trouble is, the MSDN content is no longer onlab.msdn.microsoft.com
as it was in 'beta'. It all got moved tomsdn2.microsoft.com
. If you actually use Live Search directly, without even specifyingsite:
, the documentation on MSDN2 is the top hit.Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
-
Come to think of it, I usually go through Google as well.
_____________________________________________ Flea Market! It's just like...it's just like...A MINI-MALL!
leckey wrote:
I usually go through Google as well
If I don't have to search, simply look it up to remind me, I may go direct. But if I have to search MSDN, I always use google.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article
Greets! Joel
-
Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article
Greets! Joel
Also, Google is faster than MSDN. Time to use the cached pages? :~
If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Blog - My Photos - ScrewTurn Wiki
-
Also, Google is faster than MSDN. Time to use the cached pages? :~
If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Blog - My Photos - ScrewTurn Wiki
Dario Solera wrote:
Google is faster than MSDN. Time to use the cached pages?
Well, it is a bit more complicated than that. Caching a search for all people is difficult. But, there are ways.... For instance, indexing search criteria in a perfectly balanced tree might be good performance for all searches, but some searches are done more often than others. Wouldn't it be nice if common searches were faster, and less-common searches slower? Depends, of course on need, but still it is possible. A Splay-tree attempts to create an imbalanced key storage that is deliberately weighted for fast response on common searches and slow response on rare searches. Caching simply holds a copy in memory so that disks are not directly accessed, but you can't chache everything, if you could, you wouldn't need storage except as a backup of your caches. ;) Still, a more optimized search geared towards the user's searches would be preferred.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
Dario Solera wrote:
Google is faster than MSDN. Time to use the cached pages?
Well, it is a bit more complicated than that. Caching a search for all people is difficult. But, there are ways.... For instance, indexing search criteria in a perfectly balanced tree might be good performance for all searches, but some searches are done more often than others. Wouldn't it be nice if common searches were faster, and less-common searches slower? Depends, of course on need, but still it is possible. A Splay-tree attempts to create an imbalanced key storage that is deliberately weighted for fast response on common searches and slow response on rare searches. Caching simply holds a copy in memory so that disks are not directly accessed, but you can't chache everything, if you could, you wouldn't need storage except as a backup of your caches. ;) Still, a more optimized search geared towards the user's searches would be preferred.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
Actually, I meant pages cached by Google...
If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Blog - My Photos - ScrewTurn Wiki
-
I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
-
Maximilien wrote:
site lab msdn microsoft
I think they're still using a hidden
site:lab.msdn.microsoft.com
search parameter with their Live Search engine. Trouble is, the MSDN content is no longer onlab.msdn.microsoft.com
as it was in 'beta'. It all got moved tomsdn2.microsoft.com
. If you actually use Live Search directly, without even specifyingsite:
, the documentation on MSDN2 is the top hit.Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
Mike Dimmick wrote:
I think they're still using a hidden site:lab.msdn.microsoft.com search parameter with their Live Search engine.
:doh: Oh, wow. I mean, seriously? :~
You must be careful in the forest Broken glass and rusty nails If you're to bring back something for us I have bullets for sale...
-
I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
The MSDN web version has a search feature? :rolleyes: Marc
-
The MSDN web version has a search feature? :rolleyes: Marc
Yeah; it's called 'click-on-their-silly-assed-AJAX-enabled-tree-control-until-you-find-it'.
Software Zen:
delete this;
-
Yeah; it's called 'click-on-their-silly-assed-AJAX-enabled-tree-control-until-you-find-it'.
Software Zen:
delete this;
:omg: ouch
Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:
-
Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article
Greets! Joel
jcdevnet wrote:
Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does
Aint that the truth! The online MSDN is ungodly slow, I go to Google before I ever go to MSDN
"Well yes, it is an Integer, but it's a metrosexual Integer. For all we know, under all that hair gel it could be a Boolean." Tom Welch
-
I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
Another Google vote from me. I always use Google to get to MSDN links. I generally append "microsoft" to my search strings to pull the MSDN2 hits to the top. Every once in a while I need to append "msdn" but generally "microsoft" works best. Mark
Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:
-
Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article
Greets! Joel
jcdevnet wrote:
Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article
and still they want us to believe on Windows Live search.:sigh:
He's become a household word in the Lounge. A whole new phraseology has evolved. Post a link or reply with a smiley and rose, and you've made a "Satipsism". So what? It's an interesting thing about the Internet, the evolution (as in change, not progress) of tone, quality, terminology, etc. -Marc Clifton. Best wishes to Rexx[^
-
I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
Use Google, then click on the link it provides to MSDN. That's the only way you'll ever find anything useful from Microsoft.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"