Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I hate MSDN (the web version)

I hate MSDN (the web version)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
algorithmsannouncement
34 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Maximilien
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.


    Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

    P J M O M 11 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M Maximilien

      I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.


      Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Why stop there - I'm none too keen on the none web version of MSDN now as well. It used to be good, but Microsoft systematically removed the bits that made it easy to use and relevant.

      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Maximilien

        I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.


        Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jcdevnet
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article

        Greets! Joel

        L D J P E 5 Replies Last reply
        0
        • J jcdevnet

          Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article

          Greets! Joel

          L Offline
          L Offline
          leckey 0
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Come to think of it, I usually go through Google as well.

          _____________________________________________ Flea Market! It's just like...it's just like...A MINI-MALL!

          E 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Pete OHanlon

            Why stop there - I'm none too keen on the none web version of MSDN now as well. It used to be good, but Microsoft systematically removed the bits that made it easy to use and relevant.

            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jim Crafton
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Not only that, but the new layout is so ungodly slow it's utterly frustrating to do anything with it at all. On the upside, at least there's something (try looking up help with *nix man :) ). This does bring to mind a question: What did the MSDN developers develop this on? Do they have some uber fast 4 Gb internal network that they use? Wouldn't the poor performance have cropped up? And if not, why not?

            ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

            S B 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Maximilien

              I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.


              Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mike Dimmick
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Maximilien wrote:

              site lab msdn microsoft

              I think they're still using a hidden site:lab.msdn.microsoft.com search parameter with their Live Search engine. Trouble is, the MSDN content is no longer on lab.msdn.microsoft.com as it was in 'beta'. It all got moved to msdn2.microsoft.com. If you actually use Live Search directly, without even specifying site:, the documentation on MSDN2 is the top hit.

              Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L leckey 0

                Come to think of it, I usually go through Google as well.

                _____________________________________________ Flea Market! It's just like...it's just like...A MINI-MALL!

                E Offline
                E Offline
                El Corazon
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                leckey wrote:

                I usually go through Google as well

                If I don't have to search, simply look it up to remind me, I may go direct. But if I have to search MSDN, I always use google.

                _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J jcdevnet

                  Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article

                  Greets! Joel

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dario Solera
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Also, Google is faster than MSDN. Time to use the cached pages? :~

                  If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Blog - My Photos - ScrewTurn Wiki

                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jcdevnet

                    Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article

                    Greets! Joel

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jond777
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I replaced MSDN with Google YEARS ago.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dario Solera

                      Also, Google is faster than MSDN. Time to use the cached pages? :~

                      If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Blog - My Photos - ScrewTurn Wiki

                      E Offline
                      E Offline
                      El Corazon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Dario Solera wrote:

                      Google is faster than MSDN. Time to use the cached pages?

                      Well, it is a bit more complicated than that. Caching a search for all people is difficult. But, there are ways.... For instance, indexing search criteria in a perfectly balanced tree might be good performance for all searches, but some searches are done more often than others. Wouldn't it be nice if common searches were faster, and less-common searches slower? Depends, of course on need, but still it is possible. A Splay-tree attempts to create an imbalanced key storage that is deliberately weighted for fast response on common searches and slow response on rare searches. Caching simply holds a copy in memory so that disks are not directly accessed, but you can't chache everything, if you could, you wouldn't need storage except as a backup of your caches. ;) Still, a more optimized search geared towards the user's searches would be preferred.

                      _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E El Corazon

                        Dario Solera wrote:

                        Google is faster than MSDN. Time to use the cached pages?

                        Well, it is a bit more complicated than that. Caching a search for all people is difficult. But, there are ways.... For instance, indexing search criteria in a perfectly balanced tree might be good performance for all searches, but some searches are done more often than others. Wouldn't it be nice if common searches were faster, and less-common searches slower? Depends, of course on need, but still it is possible. A Splay-tree attempts to create an imbalanced key storage that is deliberately weighted for fast response on common searches and slow response on rare searches. Caching simply holds a copy in memory so that disks are not directly accessed, but you can't chache everything, if you could, you wouldn't need storage except as a backup of your caches. ;) Still, a more optimized search geared towards the user's searches would be preferred.

                        _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dario Solera
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Actually, I meant pages cached by Google...

                        If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Blog - My Photos - ScrewTurn Wiki

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Maximilien

                          I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.


                          Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

                          O Offline
                          O Offline
                          originSH
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=CDC%3A%3ABitBlt+site%3Amsdn2.microsoft.com&meta=[^] I always go via google and just tell it to point at the msdn site.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Mike Dimmick

                            Maximilien wrote:

                            site lab msdn microsoft

                            I think they're still using a hidden site:lab.msdn.microsoft.com search parameter with their Live Search engine. Trouble is, the MSDN content is no longer on lab.msdn.microsoft.com as it was in 'beta'. It all got moved to msdn2.microsoft.com. If you actually use Live Search directly, without even specifying site:, the documentation on MSDN2 is the top hit.

                            Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Shog9 0
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Mike Dimmick wrote:

                            I think they're still using a hidden site:lab.msdn.microsoft.com search parameter with their Live Search engine.

                            :doh: Oh, wow. I mean, seriously? :~

                            You must be careful in the forest Broken glass and rusty nails If you're to bring back something for us I have bullets for sale...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Maximilien

                              I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.


                              Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Marc Clifton
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              The MSDN web version has a search feature? :rolleyes: Marc

                              Thyme In The Country
                              Interacx
                              My Blog

                              G D 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • M Marc Clifton

                                The MSDN web version has a search feature? :rolleyes: Marc

                                Thyme In The Country
                                Interacx
                                My Blog

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                Gary Wheeler
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Yeah; it's called 'click-on-their-silly-assed-AJAX-enabled-tree-control-until-you-find-it'.


                                Software Zen: delete this;

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Gary Wheeler

                                  Yeah; it's called 'click-on-their-silly-assed-AJAX-enabled-tree-control-until-you-find-it'.


                                  Software Zen: delete this;

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mark Salsbery
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  :omg: ouch

                                  Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J jcdevnet

                                    Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article

                                    Greets! Joel

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Psycho Coder Extreme
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    jcdevnet wrote:

                                    Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does

                                    Aint that the truth! The online MSDN is ungodly slow, I go to Google before I ever go to MSDN

                                    "Well yes, it is an Integer, but it's a metrosexual Integer. For all we know, under all that hair gel it could be a Boolean." Tom Welch

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Maximilien

                                      I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.


                                      Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mark Salsbery
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Another Google vote from me. I always use Google to get to MSDN links. I generally append "microsoft" to my search strings to pull the MSDN2 hits to the top. Every once in a while I need to append "msdn" but generally "microsoft" works best. Mark

                                      Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J jcdevnet

                                        Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article

                                        Greets! Joel

                                        E Offline
                                        E Offline
                                        Eytukan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        jcdevnet wrote:

                                        Funny thing is Google searches the MSDN library better than MSDN Does the first entry for the search points to the msdn library article

                                        and still they want us to believe on Windows Live search.:sigh:


                                        He's become a household word in the Lounge. A whole new phraseology has evolved. Post a link or reply with a smiley and rose, and you've made a "Satipsism". So what? It's an interesting thing about the Internet, the evolution (as in change, not progress) of tone, quality, terminology, etc. -Marc Clifton. Best wishes to Rexx[^

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Maximilien

                                          I go in, type in CDC::BitBlt answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing CDC::BitBlt and there's even a clickable suggestion: Did you mean: cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft yeah, maybe I did mean that, let's click on that : answer : We're sorry, we couldn't find any results containing cdc bitblt site lab msdn microsoft stupid search engine, stupid, stupid, stupid. I'm wasting valuable time and money searching MSDN and ranting here. I learned my lesson : I typed CDC::BitBlt in the google search box of Firefox, and the first link is the good one. stupid MSDN.


                                          Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Roger Wright
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Use Google, then click on the link it provides to MSDN. That's the only way you'll ever find anything useful from Microsoft.

                                          "A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups