Micrsoft Can Go Screw Themselves
-
rrrrlssmmmmffff...... I must be a bit on the confused side today.. I just thought that John, if he'd play Morrowind, probably would be of the "Daedra? Big Sword kills big Daedra!" style.
To comply with a request by Mike Mullikin, the US will be given a break from all my statements for the duration of one week, up to and including July 17th, 2002, 19:05 MESZ
[sighist]If it's not a racing sim, it's not on my computer? (I reinstall Quake2 when I make a major hardware upgrade that affects the speed of the system, just to see it run fast.) ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
-
Me thinks the only reason they want the patent on openGL is because Asheron's Call I/II has gotten them so filthy rich using openGL that they're beginning to suffer from a severe Greedius Maximus Plague andthey want to profit more and more off it...to my knowledge...AC is the only Microsoft Product that uses GL in a major way.
It's good to see kids turning their minds to wholesum activities such as programming, instead of wasting their lives in the hedonistic disciplines of Sex, Drugs, & Rock & Roll... or Sex with Drugs, or Sex with Rocks while Rolling in Drugs, or whatever new-fangled perversions you little monsters have thought up now... [Shog9 on Kid Programmers]
or maybe they just want to protect themselfes from other people patenting this or other parts of OpenGL. Every cpoin has two sides, and a rim.
To comply with a request by Mike Mullikin, the US will be given a break from all my statements for the duration of one week, up to and including July 17th, 2002, 19:05 MESZ
[sighist] -
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: this is going to effectively KILL OpenGL what would be really damning is if MS had something that competed directly with OpenG... oh wait, they do.... :( come on all you MS suckups, defend your sugar-daddy now. -c
To explain Donald Knuth's relevance to computing is like explaining Paul's relevance to the Catholic Church. He isn't God, he isn't the Son of God, but he was sent by God to explain God to the masses.
/. #3848917Image Processing - easy, like Sunday morning.
Chris Losinger wrote: come on all you MS suckups, defend your sugar-daddy now. After the recent fiasco, I have been actively seeking a new quote. The search has ended..... Christian I am completely intolerant of stupidity. Stupidity is, of course, anything that doesn't conform to my way of thinking. - Jamie Hale - 29/05/2002
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Mark my words - this is going to effectively KILL OpenGL on ALL platforms. Isn't that rather the point? Why else would they do it? Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
Actually, I can think of one other reason. It might follow what Apple did with Mac OS X. If I heard right, Apple's OS uses OpenGL to optimize their graphical user interface. MS might do the same thing and probably make a new version of GDI+ (maybe GDI++). It wouldn't be too odd of a guess considering MS did merge Direct3D and DirectDraw together to take advantage of 3D acceleration in 2D drawing. Then, you will see Internet Explorer bouncing up and down from your taskbar. :) Frank Frank@Frank-L.com http://www.Frank-L.com Los Angeles, CA, USA
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: No Linux, Microsoft wins. For good or bad, Microsoft won a long time ago. Linux is little more than a religious statement in the grand scheme of things. Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
Christopher Duncan wrote: Linux is little more than a religious statement in the grand scheme of things. ¿Que? Have you ever visited universities, ISPs, and pretty much any other IT-related business with a lot of networking involved? Linux is huge. It's cheap, and it gets the job done. Tasks where Linux is involved: web server, email server, dns server, file server, fire wall, computer lab (university mostly), application server (the web-pr0n industry thrives on Linux and Apache), research activities (university). I'd say it's not a religious statement in the grand scheme of things. It's getting things done cheap! Once you set up a simple dns server for instance, little or no maintainence is necessary (except for the DNS database, but you can't escape that anyhow!). TCO with Linux is low, and in most cases lower no matter what Microsoft and some "independent" analyst says. Sonorked as well: 100.13197 jorgen FreeBSD is sexy.
-
Actually, I can think of one other reason. It might follow what Apple did with Mac OS X. If I heard right, Apple's OS uses OpenGL to optimize their graphical user interface. MS might do the same thing and probably make a new version of GDI+ (maybe GDI++). It wouldn't be too odd of a guess considering MS did merge Direct3D and DirectDraw together to take advantage of 3D acceleration in 2D drawing. Then, you will see Internet Explorer bouncing up and down from your taskbar. :) Frank Frank@Frank-L.com http://www.Frank-L.com Los Angeles, CA, USA
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: I thought this has already happened in DirectX 8? I don't believe that GDI or GDI+ utilizes anything from DirectX 8. I was referring to the graphical user interface and not DirectX itself. Apple uses OpenGL for the GUI, not exclusively for games, window, or fullscreen. Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: FreeBSD is sexy. Unfortunately, FreeBSD 4.6 is not so sexy for me because I couldn't get passed the installation without messing up the screen with my ATI Radeon. I gave up on installing it a while ago. Frank Frank@Frank-L.com http://www.Frank-L.com Los Angeles, CA, USA
-
Christopher Duncan wrote: Linux is little more than a religious statement in the grand scheme of things. ¿Que? Have you ever visited universities, ISPs, and pretty much any other IT-related business with a lot of networking involved? Linux is huge. It's cheap, and it gets the job done. Tasks where Linux is involved: web server, email server, dns server, file server, fire wall, computer lab (university mostly), application server (the web-pr0n industry thrives on Linux and Apache), research activities (university). I'd say it's not a religious statement in the grand scheme of things. It's getting things done cheap! Once you set up a simple dns server for instance, little or no maintainence is necessary (except for the DNS database, but you can't escape that anyhow!). TCO with Linux is low, and in most cases lower no matter what Microsoft and some "independent" analyst says. Sonorked as well: 100.13197 jorgen FreeBSD is sexy.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: TCO with Linux is low, and in most cases lower no matter what Microsoft and some "independent" analyst says. Desktop-wise, no company could switch from MS to Linux because it could alienate users from it's not-so-easy-to-use interface. Support will be called up all the time whenever there's something that can't be solved by a point-and-click. Actually, I would disagree on the web server to some extent. Static web pages may be served best with Linux. But developing web applications are becoming very fast on MS due to ASP and ASP.NET (heh, I'm actually reading up on it). So, like any programming language and OS, it really depends on what features you are looking for. Moreover, never underestimate the 'other' OS. ;P Frank Frank@Frank-L.com http://www.Frank-L.com Los Angeles, CA, USA
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: I thought this has already happened in DirectX 8? I don't believe that GDI or GDI+ utilizes anything from DirectX 8. I was referring to the graphical user interface and not DirectX itself. Apple uses OpenGL for the GUI, not exclusively for games, window, or fullscreen. Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: FreeBSD is sexy. Unfortunately, FreeBSD 4.6 is not so sexy for me because I couldn't get passed the installation without messing up the screen with my ATI Radeon. I gave up on installing it a while ago. Frank Frank@Frank-L.com http://www.Frank-L.com Los Angeles, CA, USA
Frank Liao wrote: I don't believe that GDI or GDI+ utilizes anything from DirectX 8. I was referring to the graphical user interface and not DirectX itself. Apple uses OpenGL for the GUI, not exclusively for games, window, or fullscreen. Ah, ok. Frank Liao wrote: Unfortunately, FreeBSD 4.6 is not so sexy for me because I couldn't get passed the installation without messing up the screen with my ATI Radeon. I gave up on installing it a while ago. If you would have said 4.5 I would have said "thought so" since it shipped XFree86 3.3.6 by default. 4.6 however ships with XFree84 4 which usually handles newer cards without a problem. I usually install XFree afterwards when I have everything set up as I want (I've been burnt by XFree86 3.x before, so I want a "safe-mode" OS to return to before I screw X up :) Sonorked as well: 100.13197 jorgen FreeBSD is sexy.
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: TCO with Linux is low, and in most cases lower no matter what Microsoft and some "independent" analyst says. Desktop-wise, no company could switch from MS to Linux because it could alienate users from it's not-so-easy-to-use interface. Support will be called up all the time whenever there's something that can't be solved by a point-and-click. Actually, I would disagree on the web server to some extent. Static web pages may be served best with Linux. But developing web applications are becoming very fast on MS due to ASP and ASP.NET (heh, I'm actually reading up on it). So, like any programming language and OS, it really depends on what features you are looking for. Moreover, never underestimate the 'other' OS. ;P Frank Frank@Frank-L.com http://www.Frank-L.com Los Angeles, CA, USA
Frank Liao wrote: Desktop-wise, no company could switch from MS to Linux because it could alienate users from it's not-so-easy-to-use interface. Support will be called up all the time whenever there's something that can't be solved by a point-and-click. Desktop-wise for students, researchers, teachers Linux is a nice alternative_Sentence edited after the discovery of a negation too much_. But for many others it would not be a good idea. But I avoided this area carefully in my earlier post. Obviously you spotted it :-D Frank Liao wrote: Actually, I would disagree on the web server to some extent. Static web pages may be served best with Linux. But developing web applications are becoming very fast on MS due to ASP and ASP.NET (heh, I'm actually reading up on it). So, like any programming language and OS, it really depends on what features you are looking for. I haven't had the chance to do any work using ASP.NET yet so I can't really say anything about it. But ASP/IIS is not much different from PHP/Apache. Same shit, different names. ;) (I'm not too fond of web development/applications...) ASP.NET is the Web Forms thingie right? If it is, well.. then PHP & Co is a bit behind. But I looked at the html source code which is produced from the form files, it's not very high tech stuff - PHP crowd will catch up sooner or later. (Even I, the web-dead developer I am, pondered on how to realize a web-UI such as that about 1-1½ years ago). What does ASP.NET deliver that is so revolutionary? Frank Liao wrote: Moreover, never underestimate the 'other' OS. Agree. I say "pick the best tool for the job". It's just a matter of deciding what "the best tool" means :) Sonorked as well: 100.13197 jorgen FreeBSD is sexy.
