Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Asp.net rich text edit control?

Asp.net rich text edit control?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpquestionasp-netcomcareer
29 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christopher Duncan

    In fairness, I just took another look and realized that they haven't yet put out their first release candidate. It's not entirely fair to judge the quality of software while the cooks still have their fingers in the pot. :)

    Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Douglas Troy
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Christopher Duncan wrote:

    while the cooks still have their fingers in the pot

    Ok, I don't know what places you eat at, but please give me a list, because I want to avoid them ... :~ :-D


    :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
    Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Douglas Troy

      Christopher Duncan wrote:

      while the cooks still have their fingers in the pot

      Ok, I don't know what places you eat at, but please give me a list, because I want to avoid them ... :~ :-D


      :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
      Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christopher Duncan
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      :laugh: Then you clearly don't want to know about the clumsy, knife weilding sushi chef who likes to put a little of himself into his work... :)

      Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Christopher Duncan

        Hey, guys. FCKEdit looks like the most mature bolt on for this need, but since they're Penguins, I either have to agree to one of the open source licenses (it's a commercial app, I can't do that) or pay nearly $900 to license. It's probably worth the 900 bucks from what I've heard, but that kind of expenditure just isn't going to happen at the moment. Naturally, I first searched the CP articles. The rich text editor blocks I found were Winform based, so no go there. Anyone know of a C# / ASP.NET rich text edit control that's free or on the cheap which doesn't require me selling my soul to the Penguins?

        Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Shog9 0
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        I hate all of them. Keep meaning to write my own, but... yeah, time.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          I haven't found a really good one yet. I'm hoping the new offering (new as in it'll be out in a few weeks) from Developer Express will be as good as their other controls. Meanwhile I've been using Cute Editor[^] which has worked out fairly well. Cheers, Drew.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Christopher Duncan
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Thanks, man. Looks interesting, and the $129 license price is much more bearable than FCKEdit's pricing.

          Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Christopher Duncan

            :laugh: Then you clearly don't want to know about the clumsy, knife weilding sushi chef who likes to put a little of himself into his work... :)

            Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Douglas Troy
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            now that's a kind Maki I could do without ... X|


            :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
            Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Christopher Duncan

              Hey, guys. FCKEdit looks like the most mature bolt on for this need, but since they're Penguins, I either have to agree to one of the open source licenses (it's a commercial app, I can't do that) or pay nearly $900 to license. It's probably worth the 900 bucks from what I've heard, but that kind of expenditure just isn't going to happen at the moment. Naturally, I first searched the CP articles. The rich text editor blocks I found were Winform based, so no go there. Anyone know of a C# / ASP.NET rich text edit control that's free or on the cheap which doesn't require me selling my soul to the Penguins?

              Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

              K Offline
              K Offline
              kryzchek
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              I've used FreeTextBox with a few projects http://freetextbox.com/default.aspx[^]

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Roger Alsing 0

                And whats wrong with LGPL? LGPL is not the same as GPL, no need to opensource your stuff or anything..

                Blog: http://www.rogeralsing.com Projects: http://www.puzzleframework.com

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Christopher Duncan
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Thanks, man. What are the requirements to use LGPL in a commercial app, then? (There must be some constraints, else there would be no need for the license).

                Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christopher Duncan

                  Thanks, man. Looks interesting, and the $129 license price is much more bearable than FCKEdit's pricing.

                  Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  Christopher Duncan wrote:

                  Thanks, man. Looks interesting, and the $129 license price is much more bearable than FCKEdit's pricing.

                  Heh, no kidding. I checked out a bunch of them a year ago. Cute Editor won because it supports custom file providers so I could store images etc. in a database and still have access through the editor. The $129 license for a $5k website worked for me too. Cheers, Drew.

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Christopher Duncan

                    Thanks, man. What are the requirements to use LGPL in a commercial app, then? (There must be some constraints, else there would be no need for the license).

                    Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    leppie
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    Basically you need to license any derived work under the same license, LGPL. So if you had to add a toolbar, and that facility was not directly available via the API, and you have to modify the code of the LGPL object, you would have to make it publicly available under the LGPL.

                    xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
                    IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 2 out now

                    C C 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • L leppie

                      Basically you need to license any derived work under the same license, LGPL. So if you had to add a toolbar, and that facility was not directly available via the API, and you have to modify the code of the LGPL object, you would have to make it publicly available under the LGPL.

                      xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
                      IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 2 out now

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Christopher Duncan
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Thanks, Leppie. And with no disrespect intended towards those who wear formal attire, that's what I mean by not wanting to sell my soul to the Penguins. :-D

                      Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Christopher Duncan wrote:

                        Thanks, man. Looks interesting, and the $129 license price is much more bearable than FCKEdit's pricing.

                        Heh, no kidding. I checked out a bunch of them a year ago. Cute Editor won because it supports custom file providers so I could store images etc. in a database and still have access through the editor. The $129 license for a $5k website worked for me too. Cheers, Drew.

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Christopher Duncan
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        Well, I've downloaded the trial version, and if I can bolt it on and get it working without any major adventures (their forums indicate there may be some), I'll probably be whipping out the credit card before the day is through. Even if they do use X| PayPay. :) Thanks, man!

                        Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Christopher Duncan

                          Thanks, Leppie. And with no disrespect intended towards those who wear formal attire, that's what I mean by not wanting to sell my soul to the Penguins. :-D

                          Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          leppie
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Christopher Duncan wrote:

                          that's what I mean by not wanting to sell my soul to the Penguins

                          Its a virus, it infects all your code.

                          xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
                          IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 2 out now

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Christopher Duncan

                            In fairness, I just took another look and realized that they haven't yet put out their first release candidate. It's not entirely fair to judge the quality of software while the cooks still have their fingers in the pot. :)

                            Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            peterchen
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            And it wouldn't be fair to your clients to bet their business on it ;)

                            We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
                            blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Shog9 0

                              I hate all of them. Keep meaning to write my own, but... yeah, time.

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              David Stone
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              We kinda did...didn't we? ;P

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                I haven't found a really good one yet. I'm hoping the new offering (new as in it'll be out in a few weeks) from Developer Express will be as good as their other controls. Meanwhile I've been using Cute Editor[^] which has worked out fairly well. Cheers, Drew.

                                O Offline
                                O Offline
                                Oakman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                Drew Stainton wrote:

                                Meanwhile I've been using Cute Editor[^] which has worked out fairly well.

                                I've used it, too. It was pretty robust and provided decent customizability

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D David Stone

                                  We kinda did...didn't we? ;P

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Shog9 0
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  Hah! Yes, i'm talking more about something i could just drop into another app. :) Thing is, what i really want - and this would kinda be cool for CPhog as well - is an editor that supports... well, i'm not sure what to call them, but blocks of HTML that can't be edited directly. So for a wiki editor, you could drop in your ToC or a CurrentDate macro or something and have a bit of script to render a placeholder, but the rendered HTML couldn't be changed, and the actual markup generated would be something else. Or, in CPHog, instead of having an editor for the post with a signature box below it, you'd have a signature block in the post editor, but clicking on it would open up a separate chooser / editor. Kinda like the design mode in VS for WebForms stuff, but simpler. I'd also love to have a half-decent code editor mode in effect when you're in a PRE block. Auto-indent, on-the-fly syntax highlighting, etc. Again, i'm thinking of wiki / blog editors here. Ah, someday...

                                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • K kryzchek

                                    I've used FreeTextBox with a few projects http://freetextbox.com/default.aspx[^]

                                    E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    Ed Poore
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #26

                                    Second that one.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Shog9 0

                                      Hah! Yes, i'm talking more about something i could just drop into another app. :) Thing is, what i really want - and this would kinda be cool for CPhog as well - is an editor that supports... well, i'm not sure what to call them, but blocks of HTML that can't be edited directly. So for a wiki editor, you could drop in your ToC or a CurrentDate macro or something and have a bit of script to render a placeholder, but the rendered HTML couldn't be changed, and the actual markup generated would be something else. Or, in CPHog, instead of having an editor for the post with a signature box below it, you'd have a signature block in the post editor, but clicking on it would open up a separate chooser / editor. Kinda like the design mode in VS for WebForms stuff, but simpler. I'd also love to have a half-decent code editor mode in effect when you're in a PRE block. Auto-indent, on-the-fly syntax highlighting, etc. Again, i'm thinking of wiki / blog editors here. Ah, someday...

                                      B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      brian8655
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #27

                                      The code editor and syntax highlighting can be found in WYSIWYG editor from Innova Studio. I used it in a web-based email newsletter creation and distribution app I did. I ti was easy to use and I haven't had a single problem with it. The people using it are 20 year old Marketing Administrators with minimal computer skills and no HTML knowledge. It has worked out well. On top of saving me a bunch of time that may have been spent developing something similar or teaching them HTML, it was cheap. It costs $69 per developer, not per site like most, and the license allows royalty free distribution. You can find it here: http://www.innovastudio.com/editor.asp[^]. Looking at back at this post, I find it necessary to mention that I am not on Innova's marketing team nor affiliated with them in any way. Brian ----------------------------------------------- Never try to reason the prejudice out of a man. It was not reasoned into him, and cannot be reasoned out. - Sydney Smith (1771 - 1845)

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B brian8655

                                        The code editor and syntax highlighting can be found in WYSIWYG editor from Innova Studio. I used it in a web-based email newsletter creation and distribution app I did. I ti was easy to use and I haven't had a single problem with it. The people using it are 20 year old Marketing Administrators with minimal computer skills and no HTML knowledge. It has worked out well. On top of saving me a bunch of time that may have been spent developing something similar or teaching them HTML, it was cheap. It costs $69 per developer, not per site like most, and the license allows royalty free distribution. You can find it here: http://www.innovastudio.com/editor.asp[^]. Looking at back at this post, I find it necessary to mention that I am not on Innova's marketing team nor affiliated with them in any way. Brian ----------------------------------------------- Never try to reason the prejudice out of a man. It was not reasoned into him, and cannot be reasoned out. - Sydney Smith (1771 - 1845)

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Shog9 0
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #28

                                        Hmm... No interactive demo. :(

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L leppie

                                          Basically you need to license any derived work under the same license, LGPL. So if you had to add a toolbar, and that facility was not directly available via the API, and you have to modify the code of the LGPL object, you would have to make it publicly available under the LGPL.

                                          xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
                                          IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 2 out now

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          ChrisKo 0
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #29

                                          You only have to make your modifications to the LGPL'd code available. You do not have to make your code available in anyway, as long as you are not static binding to the DLL.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups