Salary History
-
MidwestLimey wrote:
I've never worked anywhere longer then 2.5 yrs
ouch... that would be a big strike here.... not that we expect people to stay forever, but 2.5 years longest means we are training you to benefit someone else never us. that's not a great incentive to any employer.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
First job out of uni sucked, so I left after 18 months. Second job imploded in the bust after 2 yrs - probably still be there otherwise. 3rd job was fun for 2.5 yrs, but when presented with a 25% pay inrease, well what can you say :) Then contracting. Now here for over a year, total of >10 yrs. I'd say I'm fairly typical. I'll also add to that, that the only way I've found to keep salary parity with the market is to leave. A sad indictment to be sure, but that's been my experience.
I'm largely language agnostic
After a while they all bug me :doh:
-
That is one thing I would at least question in the first interview from seeing that on a salary history.
John M. Drescher wrote:
That is one thing I would at least question in the first interview from seeing that on a salary history.
actually, in his message below, he is right, that is fairly common in the first 10 years, sometimes. I am one of the rare ones... a whole slew of jobs putting myself through school any way I could.... and then two jobs, though given contracting status, that second job has had multiple employers for the same desk. :-D
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
Go figure. My rule of thumb has being any upfront salary question are not worth of pursing.. :^) If the discussion comes up after a lengthly interview, I am open to talk on ball-park range, which is very wide.
/* I can C */ // or !C Yusuf
Yusuf wrote:
I am open to talk on ball-park range, which is very wide.
Me too, I can easily be bribed with PTO and flexible working arrangments. Plus a short commute or just that 'cool' feeling when you walk into their building can be a great selling point.
I'm largely language agnostic
After a while they all bug me :doh:
-
John M. Drescher wrote:
That is one thing I would at least question in the first interview from seeing that on a salary history.
actually, in his message below, he is right, that is fairly common in the first 10 years, sometimes. I am one of the rare ones... a whole slew of jobs putting myself through school any way I could.... and then two jobs, though given contracting status, that second job has had multiple employers for the same desk. :-D
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
I have had two employers since I graduated in 1996. One was a small job at the university the other is my current job so I guess I am more rare. I know this (a long with my salary history) influences my position on this as an interviewer. As for his reply. I would have accepted a reply like that and it would have totally cleared up any the issue I had with that.
-
Although I agree HR probably will want this more I think it is still useful for the interviewer. I mean if I see a candidate who consistently got 5% or better annual raises to me that says that the company rewarded him/her for their work.
John
But how would you check it anyway? Also, you don't know which raises were performance based, and which were inflation based.
-
MidwestLimey wrote:
I've never worked anywhere longer then 2.5 yrs
ouch... that would be a big strike here.... not that we expect people to stay forever, but 2.5 years longest means we are training you to benefit someone else never us. that's not a great incentive to any employer.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
El Corazon wrote:
we are training you to benefit someone else never us
You get the benefits of all the previous training that you didn't pay for. What goes around comes around.
-
I saw an advertisement for a job I am interested in, and they asked for a salary history. I have never seen that before and am curious as to exactly what is wanted. My current salary? The salary over the last 20 years? Any help is appreciated. Tim
Run away as fast as you can. The alarm bells should be ringing here. There are no legitimate reasons for wanting a Salary History.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
But how would you check it anyway? Also, you don't know which raises were performance based, and which were inflation based.
Graham Bradshaw wrote:
But how would you check it anyway?
I agree you can not check.
Graham Bradshaw wrote:
Also, you don't know which raises were performance based, and which were inflation based.
In my area inflation has been pretty low for as long as I have had a job. So that is why I am interested in raises above 5%. And also looking at the actual numbers to try to draw some conclusions.
-
I saw an advertisement for a job I am interested in, and they asked for a salary history. I have never seen that before and am curious as to exactly what is wanted. My current salary? The salary over the last 20 years? Any help is appreciated. Tim
The advice I've always heard, though I haven't managed to follow it at every job is the guy naming the price first usually ends up losing, so it's usually in your best interest to get them to name the figure first, even if it means avoiding the question a few times.
This blanket smells like ham
-
The times when I had interviewed cantidates and they did not provide all of information that I wanted their chances of getting hired went down significantly.
John
John M. Drescher wrote:
The times when I had interviewed cantidates and they did not provide all of information that I wanted their chances of getting hired went down significantly.
The only time I have been asked this information was when I went for a job in the Australian arm of a privately owned US company. I knew what salary I wanted, roughly what they would pay and then blatantly lied about what I was currently earning and had in the past. I customised it so they saw what they wanted and I got what I wanted. Unless they get to see payslips it is a waste of time as they have no way of knowing what you have provided is correct and cannot ring up an employer and clarify.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
El Corazon wrote:
we are training you to benefit someone else never us
You get the benefits of all the previous training that you didn't pay for. What goes around comes around.
Graham Bradshaw wrote:
You get the benefits of all the previous training that you didn't pay for.
This is so right!! Especially for someone who already has a number of years under his belt!! So This is a good deal.
-
First job out of uni sucked, so I left after 18 months. Second job imploded in the bust after 2 yrs - probably still be there otherwise. 3rd job was fun for 2.5 yrs, but when presented with a 25% pay inrease, well what can you say :) Then contracting. Now here for over a year, total of >10 yrs. I'd say I'm fairly typical. I'll also add to that, that the only way I've found to keep salary parity with the market is to leave. A sad indictment to be sure, but that's been my experience.
I'm largely language agnostic
After a while they all bug me :doh:
MidwestLimey wrote:
I'll also add to that, that the only way I've found to keep salary parity with the market is to leave. A sad indictment to be sure, but that's been my experience.
Yep what companies think they save with low raises they might lose with high turnover. That's all a matter of optimization. And it happens often a company might save a lot of money by avoiding bad decisions by retaining skilled workers. But these things are usually hard to write down as numbers.
-
The Salary History question is so they can try and not give you a sizable raise as well as weed out potential candidates. Normally I am not interested in such companies as it means they have HR that is a nightmare, however, the following answer always works, "My previous salaries are confidential, however, I am looking for a total compensation package of X";
Need a C# Consultant? I'm available.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. -- Ernest HemingwayEnnis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
Normally I am not interested in such companies as it means they have HR that is a nightmare
:) ROTFL!!!! You are so lucky to be in a country where only some companies behave that way. Where I am this is common practice. So nightmare for all!!
-
Run away as fast as you can. The alarm bells should be ringing here. There are no legitimate reasons for wanting a Salary History.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
I agree with this fully, no reason i can see for the question that suits your purpose.
Kyle Rozendo Developer :: Seriun UK :: RSA
-
I saw an advertisement for a job I am interested in, and they asked for a salary history. I have never seen that before and am curious as to exactly what is wanted. My current salary? The salary over the last 20 years? Any help is appreciated. Tim
Nowadays if the prospective new employer seems to really want to know my current salary and bases their decision to hire me on what I am currently earning, as far as I am concerned I will not work for them. I am more interested in working for a business who are interested in my talent - and I have come to learn that money earned does not equal talent.
You always pass failure on the way to success.
-
I'm agree with you. They don't need to know about your actual salary, and less about your salary history.
They just need to know the latest pay and the amount of increment that is desired for and that can be accomodated by the newer organization.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson -
Sometimes, companies and recruiters use it to short circuit those beyond their salary band. I always thought it is a cruel way to start the process. I was talking to head-hunter once and he jumped into the question right away ME: Well, we have not even talked about the position and what I can offer HIM: I need to know how much you make now ME: I think the topic is about the new position HIM: I still want to know ME: I don't feel comfortable talking without knowing more about the current position HIM: Ok, give me a range ME: Ok that is simple between $1 and $100 Million HIM: can you be more specific ME: I make above what the junior egineer makes but below the VP. HIM: I think you are not interested. ME: How could I be interested if the only qualification needed is my salary history. HIM: Well, nice talking to you ME: Thank you for wasting my time. BTW can I charge you my hourly rate? HIM: OK, what is your hourly rate? ME: Give me your name and address and I will bill you. HIM: Hangs the phone. ME: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
/* I can C */ // or !C Yusuf
I think... he is not a head-hunter... he is just someone trying to do statistic on peoples salary... ;P see how the guy continue the conversation when you mention bout salary and hourly rate.... :laugh:
-
The advice I've always heard, though I haven't managed to follow it at every job is the guy naming the price first usually ends up losing, so it's usually in your best interest to get them to name the figure first, even if it means avoiding the question a few times.
This blanket smells like ham
HAM???? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Do we weigh less at high tide?
-
I would simply not provide it. If they insist on it, then ask why. I've never provided it when requested and it was never a problem.
Silence is the voice of complicity. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. -- monty python Might I suggest that the universe was always the size of the cosmos. It is just that at one point the cosmos was the size of a marble. -- Colin Angus Mackay
You should go one better and do what I do - provide a hyped up salary - use the opportunity to your advantage to maximise the offer from your new employer - its always worked for me.... Lloyd.
Lloyd.
-
I saw an advertisement for a job I am interested in, and they asked for a salary history. I have never seen that before and am curious as to exactly what is wanted. My current salary? The salary over the last 20 years? Any help is appreciated. Tim
I think they just want to get a feel for if you're trying to make a jump, for example, from a $50K to a $100K job. I have been asked for my recent salary history informally (not on paper) after I had gotten through early interview stages. Especially if you're applying for a job in the same geographical market (that is, not from Silicon Valley to some podunk town where the salary is a fraction), they just want to make sure you're not trying to take advantage. Of course, I always feel like my salary should be entirely based on how much money I can earn for the company, regardless of how much I had been paid. You have to be pretty diplomatic and a good negotiator to discuss this with your potential employer. If you're not trying to make a huge (i.e. more 25%) jump in salary, just be honest and give them a recent history. Usually, it's your starting and ending salary for the last few jobs. If it's a company you like, why not just be honest with them? You'll be better off.