Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. .NET 3.What?

.NET 3.What?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpc++dotnetcomarchitecture
46 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Steve EcholsS Steve Echols

    That's a great petition and, had I known about it, I would've signed it! I'm beginning to think that petitions in general rarely work (can anyone point me to any significant ones that have?)


    - S 50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Rei Miyasaka
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    I did get a reply[^] from Jason and some attention in the press[^], but you're right, in the end it didn't do much.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Judah Gabriel Himango

      Chris, Here's another confusing bit: WPF 1.0 was part of .NET 3, right? Ok, fine. .NET 3.5 comes out, and now it's called WPF 3.5! Ha! While I agree it's confusing that the CLR, .NET framework, the languages, and the various APIs like WPF all have their own versions that makes it confusing, I do remember devs were complaining that leaving it "WinFX" was confusing. I remember a Slashdot article where everyone was like, "WinFX? What ever happened to .NET? I guess that means .NET failed! Woo! Down with M$!" So I guess I'm not sure of a better way to do this. If the CLR, .NET framework, languages, and APIs all shared the same version number, one could not increment version number without all of them incrementing. Which would mean C# 3 would be the same as C# 2, which seems equally confusing.

      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Upon this disciple I'll build my new religion? The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Maunder
      wrote on last edited by
      #38

      Ah, Slashdot. That bastion of intelligent, thoughtful discussions on Microsoft.

      cheers, Chris Maunder

      CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A azonenberg

        Me too - the only problem I have with Vista is that my display driver gets a little glitched when I try to connect a projector to the video-out port on my laptop - sometimes I get no signal. For everything else, I love it.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rei Miyasaka
        wrote on last edited by
        #39

        Mind you, nVidia did play a huge part in driving Vista's reputation into the ground with their absolutely horrible drivers. Oh, and the fact that people believe Windows hasn't made any technical advancements thanks yet again to the dumb decision to move WinFX to .NET. And yes I do mean a version number of 2010 or what not, not just a product name. .NET supports version number segments of up to 65535, so we might as well.

        modified on Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:22 PM

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Maunder

          I've seen "8 years experience in C#".

          cheers, Chris Maunder

          CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

          K Offline
          K Offline
          K Collins
          wrote on last edited by
          #40

          Chris Maunder wrote:

          I've seen "8 years experience in C#".

          It is possible. The first beta of .NET 1.0 was released in 2000.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K K Collins

            Chris Maunder wrote:

            I've seen "8 years experience in C#".

            It is possible. The first beta of .NET 1.0 was released in 2000.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Maunder
            wrote on last edited by
            #41

            June 2000. It's only March. (I know, I know...)

            cheers, Chris Maunder

            CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Rei Miyasaka

              Mind you, nVidia did play a huge part in driving Vista's reputation into the ground with their absolutely horrible drivers. Oh, and the fact that people believe Windows hasn't made any technical advancements thanks yet again to the dumb decision to move WinFX to .NET. And yes I do mean a version number of 2010 or what not, not just a product name. .NET supports version number segments of up to 65535, so we might as well.

              modified on Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:22 PM

              A Offline
              A Offline
              azonenberg
              wrote on last edited by
              #42

              reinux wrote:

              Mind you, nVidia did play a huge part in driving Vista's reputation into the ground with their absolutely horrible drivers.

              Interesting - I never even mentioned that my laptop has a GeForce 8600 card and you're talking about nVidia anyway.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jim Crafton

                QmxvdyBtZSE= :)

                ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Liam OHagan
                wrote on last edited by
                #43

                haven't worked with that encoding since uni. Much preferred uuencode / uudecode :D

                I have no blog...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Chris Maunder

                  Ah, Slashdot. That bastion of intelligent, thoughtful discussions on Microsoft.

                  cheers, Chris Maunder

                  CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Judah Gabriel Himango
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #44

                  :laugh:

                  Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Upon this disciple I'll build my new religion? The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Fabio Franco

                    I disagree, if you want to work with something you must at least know a bit of what you are talking about, it doesn't matter if he is an expert in JAVA and knows nothing of C# if that is what he is going to work with. First, learn the language/tool, then you can go for it. This just proves he "lied" about his expertise and I think that is enough reason to not give him a job.

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Ajit Shekhawat
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #45

                    Now aggreed. After facing this issue.

                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Ajit Shekhawat

                      Now aggreed. After facing this issue.

                      F Offline
                      F Offline
                      Fabio Franco
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #46

                      Wow, long time... So, you faced the issue couz it happened to you or someone you were hiring?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups