Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Programming Orientation

Programming Orientation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
oopquestion
27 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P peterchen

    According to wikipedia, F# mixes functional, procedural and object oriented elements. Advantage: pick the best tool. Disadvantage: to understand someone elses source code, you need to understand all three concepts.

    We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
    blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Brady Kelly
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    I have no problem with the concepts, but I do have a problem marrying them to the actual language. I think I just haven't spent nearly enough time with F#.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Ajit Shekhawat

      We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

      N Offline
      N Offline
      NormDroid
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Landscape, no changed my mind, portrait.

      Brainware Error - reboot required.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Brady Kelly

        I have no problem with the concepts, but I do have a problem marrying them to the actual language. I think I just haven't spent nearly enough time with F#.

        P Offline
        P Offline
        peterchen
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Brady Kelly wrote:

        I have no problem with the concepts, but I do have a problem marrying them to the actual language.

        Yeah. My hesitation comes from the difference of being able to understand the concepts, and working with them fluently - similar to whether I can work out the meaning of a paragraph in a foreign language with the help of a dicitonary and a native speaker, or can read and understand jargon fluently.

        We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
        blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Ajit Shekhawat

          We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Meech
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

          Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

          M R E S 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • A Ajit Shekhawat

            We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Losinger
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

            What's next and why?

            whatever gets the job done the quickest. because that's what programming is for.

            image processing toolkits | batch image processing

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Meech

              combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

              Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

              M Offline
              M Offline
              martin_hughes
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              In which case, let me be the first to coin the phrase IronPoop - Poop running on the DLR :)

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Meech

                combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

                Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rajesh R Subramanian
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                The future is going to be full of POOP. Look forward to see things like Open POOP, POOP .NET, POOP Studio, etc.,

                Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M martin_hughes

                  In which case, let me be the first to coin the phrase IronPoop - Poop running on the DLR :)

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rajesh R Subramanian
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Good thing - Ruby on POOP.

                  Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Ajit Shekhawat

                    We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Leslie Sanford
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                    Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP.

                    Functional.

                    Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                    What's next and why?

                    A combination of the above. You see this with functional features being added to C#. Many different programming approaches seem to have reached equal footing now; there's not just one dominant paradigm. So it's up to a programmer to become intimately familiar with his/her domain. Then choose the most appropriate tools for getting the job done in that domain.

                    E 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                      Good thing - Ruby on POOP.

                      Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Douglas Troy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      ... and don't forget the Mac version iPOOP


                      :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                      Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                      B P 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Meech

                        combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

                        Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        El Corazon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

                        _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                        C M 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • A Ajit Shekhawat

                          We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

                          E Offline
                          E Offline
                          El Corazon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                          Programming Orientation

                          Landscape.... think on it a bit...

                          _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Leslie Sanford

                            Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                            Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP.

                            Functional.

                            Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                            What's next and why?

                            A combination of the above. You see this with functional features being added to C#. Many different programming approaches seem to have reached equal footing now; there's not just one dominant paradigm. So it's up to a programmer to become intimately familiar with his/her domain. Then choose the most appropriate tools for getting the job done in that domain.

                            E Offline
                            E Offline
                            El Corazon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            Leslie Sanford wrote:

                            You see this with functional features being added to C#.

                            and C++0x

                            _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E El Corazon

                              in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

                              _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Chris Meech
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              LOL. Sometimes I think I missed my calling. What I could've accomplished if only I had gone into marketing. :)

                              Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                              E 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E El Corazon

                                in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

                                _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                martin_hughes
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                And not forgetting EmbeddedPOOP featuring a cut down version of the POOP Runtime (Runny POOP) :)

                                E 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Ajit Shekhawat

                                  We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Madhu Cheriyedath
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                                  Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why?

                                  F# is a functional programming language. I heard about it a couple of years back (someone from our organization mentioned that they are planning to use it - I don't know whether they are using it now). Functional programming languages are the new frontier for many of the people. People say that with more work is going to be done at 'parallel programming' because of the advancement in hardware (multi-core CPUs etc), functional programming languages are better suitable to do those types of tasks. Haskell, Erlang are also getting more attention these days.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Douglas Troy

                                    ... and don't forget the Mac version iPOOP


                                    :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                                    Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                                    B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    BoneSoft
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    And it's enthusiasts, POOPiphiliacs.


                                    Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Chris Meech

                                      combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

                                      Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Sean Cundiff
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      I, for one, will not be using POOP. I heard the debugger was, well, a bit crappy.

                                      -Sean ---- It's not that I like expensive things, it's just that the things I like are expensive. - My Wife

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Sean Cundiff

                                        I, for one, will not be using POOP. I heard the debugger was, well, a bit crappy.

                                        -Sean ---- It's not that I like expensive things, it's just that the things I like are expensive. - My Wife

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Chris Meech
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        And the runtime doesn't clean up after itself, either. :)

                                        Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                                        E 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M martin_hughes

                                          And not forgetting EmbeddedPOOP featuring a cut down version of the POOP Runtime (Runny POOP) :)

                                          E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          El Corazon
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          and I am sure that the GNU group will have to get involved, and there will be GNU POOP. Which brings up the infamous question... if everyone has POOP already and a GNU POOP is found on the internet, who will run and see it?

                                          _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups