Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Programming Orientation

Programming Orientation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
oopquestion
27 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Brady Kelly

    I have no problem with the concepts, but I do have a problem marrying them to the actual language. I think I just haven't spent nearly enough time with F#.

    P Offline
    P Offline
    peterchen
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Brady Kelly wrote:

    I have no problem with the concepts, but I do have a problem marrying them to the actual language.

    Yeah. My hesitation comes from the difference of being able to understand the concepts, and working with them fluently - similar to whether I can work out the meaning of a paragraph in a foreign language with the help of a dicitonary and a native speaker, or can read and understand jargon fluently.

    We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
    blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Ajit Shekhawat

      We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Meech
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

      Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

      M R E S 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • A Ajit Shekhawat

        We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris Losinger
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

        What's next and why?

        whatever gets the job done the quickest. because that's what programming is for.

        image processing toolkits | batch image processing

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Meech

          combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

          Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

          M Offline
          M Offline
          martin_hughes
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          In which case, let me be the first to coin the phrase IronPoop - Poop running on the DLR :)

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Meech

            combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

            Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rajesh R Subramanian
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            The future is going to be full of POOP. Look forward to see things like Open POOP, POOP .NET, POOP Studio, etc.,

            Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M martin_hughes

              In which case, let me be the first to coin the phrase IronPoop - Poop running on the DLR :)

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rajesh R Subramanian
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Good thing - Ruby on POOP.

              Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Ajit Shekhawat

                We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Leslie Sanford
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP.

                Functional.

                Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                What's next and why?

                A combination of the above. You see this with functional features being added to C#. Many different programming approaches seem to have reached equal footing now; there's not just one dominant paradigm. So it's up to a programmer to become intimately familiar with his/her domain. Then choose the most appropriate tools for getting the job done in that domain.

                E 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                  Good thing - Ruby on POOP.

                  Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Douglas Troy
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  ... and don't forget the Mac version iPOOP


                  :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                  Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                  B P 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Meech

                    combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

                    Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    El Corazon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

                    _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                    C M 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • A Ajit Shekhawat

                      We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

                      E Offline
                      E Offline
                      El Corazon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                      Programming Orientation

                      Landscape.... think on it a bit...

                      _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Leslie Sanford

                        Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                        Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP.

                        Functional.

                        Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                        What's next and why?

                        A combination of the above. You see this with functional features being added to C#. Many different programming approaches seem to have reached equal footing now; there's not just one dominant paradigm. So it's up to a programmer to become intimately familiar with his/her domain. Then choose the most appropriate tools for getting the job done in that domain.

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        El Corazon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Leslie Sanford wrote:

                        You see this with functional features being added to C#.

                        and C++0x

                        _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E El Corazon

                          in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

                          _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Chris Meech
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          LOL. Sometimes I think I missed my calling. What I could've accomplished if only I had gone into marketing. :)

                          Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                          E 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E El Corazon

                            in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

                            _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            martin_hughes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            And not forgetting EmbeddedPOOP featuring a cut down version of the POOP Runtime (Runny POOP) :)

                            E 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Ajit Shekhawat

                              We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Madhu Cheriyedath
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                              Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why?

                              F# is a functional programming language. I heard about it a couple of years back (someone from our organization mentioned that they are planning to use it - I don't know whether they are using it now). Functional programming languages are the new frontier for many of the people. People say that with more work is going to be done at 'parallel programming' because of the advancement in hardware (multi-core CPUs etc), functional programming languages are better suitable to do those types of tasks. Haskell, Erlang are also getting more attention these days.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Douglas Troy

                                ... and don't forget the Mac version iPOOP


                                :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                                Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                BoneSoft
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                And it's enthusiasts, POOPiphiliacs.


                                Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Chris Meech

                                  combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

                                  Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Sean Cundiff
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  I, for one, will not be using POOP. I heard the debugger was, well, a bit crappy.

                                  -Sean ---- It's not that I like expensive things, it's just that the things I like are expensive. - My Wife

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Sean Cundiff

                                    I, for one, will not be using POOP. I heard the debugger was, well, a bit crappy.

                                    -Sean ---- It's not that I like expensive things, it's just that the things I like are expensive. - My Wife

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    Chris Meech
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    And the runtime doesn't clean up after itself, either. :)

                                    Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                                    E 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M martin_hughes

                                      And not forgetting EmbeddedPOOP featuring a cut down version of the POOP Runtime (Runny POOP) :)

                                      E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      El Corazon
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      and I am sure that the GNU group will have to get involved, and there will be GNU POOP. Which brings up the infamous question... if everyone has POOP already and a GNU POOP is found on the internet, who will run and see it?

                                      _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Chris Meech

                                        And the runtime doesn't clean up after itself, either. :)

                                        Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                                        E Offline
                                        E Offline
                                        El Corazon
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        It does not have good garbage collection, but the flush usually works well... unfortunately on the rare occasion it doesn't work, things get really messy.

                                        _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Chris Meech

                                          LOL. Sometimes I think I missed my calling. What I could've accomplished if only I had gone into marketing. :)

                                          Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                                          E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          El Corazon
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          Chris Meech wrote:

                                          What I could've accomplished if only I had gone into marketing.

                                          you aren't evil enough. ;P

                                          _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups