Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Programming Orientation

Programming Orientation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
oopquestion
27 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M martin_hughes

    In which case, let me be the first to coin the phrase IronPoop - Poop running on the DLR :)

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Rajesh R Subramanian
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Good thing - Ruby on POOP.

    Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Ajit Shekhawat

      We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Leslie Sanford
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

      Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP.

      Functional.

      Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

      What's next and why?

      A combination of the above. You see this with functional features being added to C#. Many different programming approaches seem to have reached equal footing now; there's not just one dominant paradigm. So it's up to a programmer to become intimately familiar with his/her domain. Then choose the most appropriate tools for getting the job done in that domain.

      E 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rajesh R Subramanian

        Good thing - Ruby on POOP.

        Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Douglas Troy
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        ... and don't forget the Mac version iPOOP


        :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
        Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

        B P 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Meech

          combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

          Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

          E Offline
          E Offline
          El Corazon
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

          _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

          C M 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • A Ajit Shekhawat

            We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

            E Offline
            E Offline
            El Corazon
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

            Programming Orientation

            Landscape.... think on it a bit...

            _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Leslie Sanford

              Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

              Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP.

              Functional.

              Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

              What's next and why?

              A combination of the above. You see this with functional features being added to C#. Many different programming approaches seem to have reached equal footing now; there's not just one dominant paradigm. So it's up to a programmer to become intimately familiar with his/her domain. Then choose the most appropriate tools for getting the job done in that domain.

              E Offline
              E Offline
              El Corazon
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              Leslie Sanford wrote:

              You see this with functional features being added to C#.

              and C++0x

              _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E El Corazon

                in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

                _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Meech
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                LOL. Sometimes I think I missed my calling. What I could've accomplished if only I had gone into marketing. :)

                Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                E 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E El Corazon

                  in addition to the ironPoop listed above I formally dedicate these to the new POOP standard: FlexPOOP : cross platform POOP barePOOP/miniPOOP/microPOOP : reduced footprint embedded systems POOP (and a variation on the last one there: uPOOP) for the computer aided code writing folks there is: POOPaware, EnterprisePOOP, and distributedPOOP for the large cluster folks: distributedPOOP, clusterPOOP, NetPOOP (not to be confused with POOP.NET), and GridPOOP but always remember, no matter where you POOP, always verify your error checking is done correctly! Throw POOP, and Catch POOP! Now go forth brave programmers of the future and POOP in everyway you can!

                  _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  martin_hughes
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  And not forgetting EmbeddedPOOP featuring a cut down version of the POOP Runtime (Runny POOP) :)

                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Ajit Shekhawat

                    We started with Procedure Oriented programming. Then we moved on Object Oriented Programming. Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why? :confused: Thanks and Regards Ajit

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Madhu Cheriyedath
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Ajit Shekhawat wrote:

                    Now F# is something which is neither OOPs nor POP. What's next and why?

                    F# is a functional programming language. I heard about it a couple of years back (someone from our organization mentioned that they are planning to use it - I don't know whether they are using it now). Functional programming languages are the new frontier for many of the people. People say that with more work is going to be done at 'parallel programming' because of the advancement in hardware (multi-core CPUs etc), functional programming languages are better suitable to do those types of tasks. Haskell, Erlang are also getting more attention these days.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Douglas Troy

                      ... and don't forget the Mac version iPOOP


                      :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                      Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      BoneSoft
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      And it's enthusiasts, POOPiphiliacs.


                      Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Meech

                        combination of the two paradigms. It will be known as POOP. Programming with Objects and Other Pieces. :)

                        Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sean Cundiff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        I, for one, will not be using POOP. I heard the debugger was, well, a bit crappy.

                        -Sean ---- It's not that I like expensive things, it's just that the things I like are expensive. - My Wife

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Sean Cundiff

                          I, for one, will not be using POOP. I heard the debugger was, well, a bit crappy.

                          -Sean ---- It's not that I like expensive things, it's just that the things I like are expensive. - My Wife

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Chris Meech
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          And the runtime doesn't clean up after itself, either. :)

                          Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                          E 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M martin_hughes

                            And not forgetting EmbeddedPOOP featuring a cut down version of the POOP Runtime (Runny POOP) :)

                            E Offline
                            E Offline
                            El Corazon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            and I am sure that the GNU group will have to get involved, and there will be GNU POOP. Which brings up the infamous question... if everyone has POOP already and a GNU POOP is found on the internet, who will run and see it?

                            _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Chris Meech

                              And the runtime doesn't clean up after itself, either. :)

                              Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                              E Offline
                              E Offline
                              El Corazon
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              It does not have good garbage collection, but the flush usually works well... unfortunately on the rare occasion it doesn't work, things get really messy.

                              _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Chris Meech

                                LOL. Sometimes I think I missed my calling. What I could've accomplished if only I had gone into marketing. :)

                                Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                                E Offline
                                E Offline
                                El Corazon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                Chris Meech wrote:

                                What I could've accomplished if only I had gone into marketing.

                                you aren't evil enough. ;P

                                _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D Douglas Troy

                                  ... and don't forget the Mac version iPOOP


                                  :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                                  Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  peterchen
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  And the web 2.0 version, youPOOP!

                                  We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
                                  blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups