bool and BOOL

[Cedric Moonen]

toxcct wrote:

have you ever worked under linux

What kind of drug is that ? ;P

Cédric Moonen Software developer
Charting control [v1.4]

[toxcct]

Cedric Moonen wrote:

What kind of drug is that ?

i'd better give up there ! lol

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

[CPallini]

BOOL is fully featured integer, for instance, you can do.

// WEIRD BOOL (legal) programming
BOOL b;
b = 1000;
b++;

You can't do the same with a bool variable. [added] Well, I made a sanity check, and actually VC++ compiler gives just a warning on the following code

bool b;
b = 1000; // Warning here (loss of info), at runtime b becomes true.
b++; // at runtime b remains true.

[/added] As stated by someone (Rajesh ? toxcct?) this is a reminiscence of the C language gold ol days (C has not the bool keyword). Using an int to represent Yes/No pair is simply a matter of convention (and convenience). :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke

[Rajesh R Subramanian]

I dunno. Azk CPallini. He'z da one who abuzez drug to answer queris realllly fazzt. He haz gud drugz and gud linkz. azk him plz. :laugh:

Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

[CPallini]

I supposed too. :laugh:

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke

[toxcct]

but one has to be careful with BOOL, as I stated at the end of my most here[^]

CPallini wrote:

C has not the bool keyword

looks like it has[^]

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

[CPallini]

toxcct wrote:

but one has to be careful with BOOL, as I stated at the end of my most here[^]

Indeed. C language implicit mapping of non-zero values to true and zero value to false is more coherent.

toxcct wrote:

looks like it has[^]

I saw it, but: shhhhhh, noone, except Nemanja, knows. :-D

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke

[Rajesh R Subramanian]

CPallini wrote:

I saw it, but: shhhhhh, noone, except Nemanja, knows.

Oh come on. You are a "C" lover. I would have expected you to know. :-D

Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

[CPallini]

Well, I'm a traditional-C lover: that fancy new C99 is alien to me. :laugh:

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke

[Jhony george]

Thanks for ur kind reply to all members whoever particpated in the discussion., by, Manivannan@Congruent

Born to win...!