What would you name this class? [modified]

[Gary R Wheeler]

FooDepartmentHead? FooDirector? FooVicePresident?

Software Zen: delete this;
Fold With Us![^]

[Gary R Wheeler]

FooCEO is remarkably close to one of my rejects: FookUp

Software Zen: delete this;
Fold With Us![^]

[Vikram A Punathambekar]

PeterTheSwede wrote:

So what exactly are you doing on a computer programming site?

Trolling endlessly on Global Warming. Stay away from the soapbox.

Cheers, Vikram.

---

The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.

[Lost User]

PeterTheSwede wrote:

Foo is one ...

Exactly. So just why does an American WW2 military acronym find get used by nerdy computer programers? Did the first programmers come form 101 airborn? Makes me want to puke!

PeterTheSwede wrote:

Using it shows experience and literacy (and/or age, possibly - which also calls for respect).

That is exactly my point. Its used purely to atempt to appear more 'expert' or whatever despite the fact the user most likely isnt.

PeterTheSwede wrote:

So what exactly are you doing on a computer programming site?

Sorry, did CP become the home of nerds? I thought it was for software engineers? h, by the way, I was in mechanical engineering for many years before switching to software engineering, so I have many traits of a mechanical engineer, I like beer and cars for example, and not those of a typical software engineer.

Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

[Lost User]

John C wrote:

For the most part he's the village idiot

Do you really take it so seriously?

John C wrote:

I do agree with a dislike of nerdiness for nerdiness sake, if there as a CodeProject for people who own their own business and write the software I'd be there a lot talking about getting things done.

Agree.

Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

[Maidomax]

FooUberlord FooOverlord would be okay too.

bling bling

[MRLacey]

I wouldn't. Go back and create an OO design. Objects shouldn't control other objects.

[Ravi Bhavnani]

MRLacey wrote:

Objects shouldn't control other objects.

Are you completely unfamiliar with the concept of design patterns? /ravi

My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

[grgran]

Tish, tish ... don't you mean fooCIO ... after all what if he wants to create a class that manages a collection of fooCIO objects ? ;-)

[SyntaxC4 0]

I'd say FooManagerCollection, or even FooManagerFactory.

[cjdunford]

What's wrong with 'FooManagers'? There's a nice little convention (I first noticed it in VB though it undoubtedly started somewhere else) that if class A is a collection of class B objects, the name for class A is simply the plural of the name of class B. So, an 'Items' object is a collection of 'Item' objects. Items[i] is--an Item. Simple, obvious, works in most cases.

[JasonCordes]

A manager of managers. Good question. I would be penchant for something like FooSupervisor or MCP (for those Tron geeks out there).

[brian8655]

I don't know what kind of data structures you are using, but somewhere in there I hope you have a queue. Even if you don't need it, how can you resist creating an object named FooQueue?

Brian ----------------------------------------------- Never try to reason the prejudice out of a man. It was not reasoned into him, and cannot be reasoned out. - Sydney Smith (1771 - 1845) If we were to wake up some morning and find that everyone was the same race, creed and color, we would find some other cause for prejudice by noon. - George Aiken

[BillWoodruff]

an object that controls a collection of FooManagers? Dear Ravi, May I suggest : MoFoManager MotherOfAllFoos FooManagerHerder If you are a Hindi speaker, may I suggest : AndherNagreeChauputRajah best, Bill

"The greater the social and cultural distances between people, the more magical the light that can spring from their contact." Milan Kundera in Testaments Trahis

[tonyS10024]

MrPresident

[destynova]

FooManagerManager would be consistent :P This is one of the things that always makes me a little uncomfortable and not satsified when writing big programs in Java. Perhaps an issue with OO in general, having large, empty hierarchies of classes... unless there is compelling logic happening at each level. It gets really tedious if you're unit-testing everything you write, and you realise you need to build something like this.

[rastaVnuce]

Oh, we're fishing for class name compliments, are we? :)

To hell with circumstances; I create opportunities.

[Rick Shaub]

FooManagerManager (FooMgrMgr for short)? FooManagerPlusPlus? FooDirector? If you create a new Manager for your FooDirector, it could be named FooVP.

[KramII]

One or all of the following: FooFooManager LordOfAllFooManagers FooAlmighty FooOfFoos HisGreatFooness TheGreatFooInTheSky Ralph

KramII

[Ravi Bhavnani]

brian8655 wrote:

an object named FooQueue?

Already suggested. :) /ravi

My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com