The problem with VB?
-
jchigg2000 wrote:
My guess is that all of the 'accused' are out googling so they can paste me a long list of someone else's thoughts
Who are you accusing? Those of us who hate and use VB have posted our reasons for displeasure many times in the past. Are you really so immune to the truth that you've ignored all of it and still persist in thinking that bastard of a language has anything to redeem it apart from the steaming piles of horrible legacy code?
Citizen 20.1.01
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
Shog9 wrote:
and use VB
They are among us? :~
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
Any language that not only features - but ENCOURAGES - the use of the
gotostatement should be stricken from the planet."Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001It only encourages it for error handling, so instead of having to use a 'goto' to handle errorsm they could just say, e.g. "ErrorProc = MyErrorHandlingProc". Note the My prefix. X| :laugh:
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
I found a seriously weird problem with VB once when using it to write a DB app that sat on a Jet engine. I had a controll called something like 'ListOfNames', the column in the Jet table was called the same thing, and for testing purposes I had a data row in the table. In this collum was a string, called, 'ListOfNames'. I could not get it to work untill I changed the datas to a different name. Now any machine thats building code by doing string comparison is, to me, in serious trouble. I quickly finished the app and have never gone near VB again. (It was historical, and had been started in VB and I had to maintain/finish it off. I had never used VB before but found it very easy).
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
I luckily never encountered that in the VB6 apps I wrote. I didn't write many, one big one, and many, many little ones. It is quite scary! :~
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
The problem with VB is that it looks like an easy language on the surface, when in fact it is absolutely not. Granted, that's VB - I've never done VB.NET. And I will avoid VB.NET for the same reason I don't consider a swastika a suitable logo for my business card. [edit] Uh, oh, he said "Swastika" [/edit]
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighistmodified on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:08 PM
peterchen wrote:
The problem with VB is that it looks like an easy language on the surface, when in fact it is absolutely not.
It is so! :confused:
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
The problem with VB.NET is the legacy from VB6, take out the legacy garbage like "On Error GoTo"(obvious), "Module"(it has encapsulation but everything public is at the same scope), and this language could be better than many others. I programmed in LISP, SCHEME, and PROLOG and that wasn't funny :(
Where's leppie? :laugh:
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
This is more like it!! Yes, I realize everything that you just stated. I personally can't think of a single language that was spot on from it's inception. For instance, a lot of people criticize C++ for not completely supporting either OO or procedural programming styles.
jchigg2000 wrote:
I personally can't think of a single language that was spot on from it's inception.
Wait, you are categorizing those gigantic flaws and barriers of VB as not being spot on? :laugh: That's another typical stereotype of VBers being acted out. ROTFLMAO
led mike
-
The problem with VB is that it looks like an easy language on the surface, when in fact it is absolutely not. Granted, that's VB - I've never done VB.NET. And I will avoid VB.NET for the same reason I don't consider a swastika a suitable logo for my business card. [edit] Uh, oh, he said "Swastika" [/edit]
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighistmodified on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:08 PM
What is it called in German? I noticed you called it a swastika, which is the English bastardization of the Indian (specifically, Sanskrit) word Swastik.
Cheers, Vikram.
The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.
-
Where's leppie? :laugh:
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
Brady Kelly wrote:
Where's leppie? [Laugh]
sorry, I did not understand :confused:
-
What is it called in German? I noticed you called it a swastika, which is the English bastardization of the Indian (specifically, Sanskrit) word Swastik.
Cheers, Vikram.
The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.
Hakenkreuz ("hooked cross") or Swastika - the latter being more a reference to the symbol as such but also totally tainted with 3rd Reich background. Wikipedia.de[^] says that the sanskrit word is indeed Swastika: Sanskrit: ????????, m., svastika, „Glücksbringer“
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist -
peterchen wrote:
The problem with VB is that it looks like an easy language on the surface, when in fact it is absolutely not.
It is so! :confused:
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
Yes :) The biggest issue from language design IMO is the nonfunctional "type-free-ness" that is actually "what actually happens depends on the underlying type but you don't really want to know". Second is the error handling which is comparedly powerful if used correctly, but hard to get right. Thir comes a bunch of leaky abstractions [^](which is the second probglem of C++, though).
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist -
Brady Kelly wrote:
Where's leppie? [Laugh]
sorry, I did not understand :confused:
leppie is a function programming man. He wouldn't like your implication that VB could be better than, say, Scheme. ;P
-
leppie is a function programming man. He wouldn't like your implication that VB could be better than, say, Scheme. ;P
eh eh I'm more an imperative/object oriented language man, like C/C++(the best), Java, C#, VB.NET(VB6 is garbage). Lisp/Scheme has a Lot of Irritating and Stupid Paranthesis :( take the parenthesis out and it could be a good language :laugh:
-
MikeMarq wrote:
Are you basing your statement on vb or on the original basic language which is only vaguely related?
We're talking about VB, so it really doesn't matter.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001I haven't used a GOTO in vb.net, ever. And the only time I ever used them in VB6 was for error handling. I'd also like to point out that C# has a goto statement. As has C/C++. None of these languages reccommend the use of goto, let alone encourage it. In C and VB6 its sometimes the cleanest way of doing stuff like error handling tho.
-
Yes :) The biggest issue from language design IMO is the nonfunctional "type-free-ness" that is actually "what actually happens depends on the underlying type but you don't really want to know". Second is the error handling which is comparedly powerful if used correctly, but hard to get right. Thir comes a bunch of leaky abstractions [^](which is the second probglem of C++, though).
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighistpeterchen wrote:
leaky abstractions [^]
That's quite a 'leaky' link!
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
Shog9 wrote:
and use VB
They are among us? :~
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
Sadly yes. My last job had me doing just that.
"Every time Lotus Notes starts up, somewhere a puppy, a kitten, a lamb, and a baby seal are killed. Lotus Notes is a conspiracy by the forces of Satan to drive us over the brink into madness. The CRC-32 for each file in the installation includes the numbers 666." Gary Wheeler "You're an idiot." John Simmons, THE Outlaw programmer "I realised that all of my best anecdotes started with "So there we were, pissed". Pete O'Hanlon
-
Hakenkreuz ("hooked cross") or Swastika - the latter being more a reference to the symbol as such but also totally tainted with 3rd Reich background. Wikipedia.de[^] says that the sanskrit word is indeed Swastika: Sanskrit: ????????, m., svastika, „Glücksbringer“
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighistIt is called ???????? (pronounced Swastik, or Svastik if you please - Indian languages make no distinction between v and w sounds) in Sanskrit, Hindi and Marathi. Swastika would be rendered as ????????? in Devanagari. I think German has been tainted by the illegitimate English 'a' in this regard. It's quite infamous, really - a lot of Indian names that end in a consonant sound have a trailing 'a' in English. Arjun is Arjuna, Krishn is Krishna, Ram is Rama, etc.
Cheers, Vikram.
The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.
-
Enough already! :) I really am getting frustrated with a lot of people that talk crap on VB when they couldn't give you one reason why it's bad. Personally, I use both C# and VB at work and can design and implement the exact same application using either. You can even use Ildasm to verify that you've created the same application. I understand that there are things you can do in VB that completely violate a number of OO concepts, but if you don't use these methods, what's the harm in hacking a out a few lines of VB?
-
Hakenkreuz ("hooked cross") or Swastika - the latter being more a reference to the symbol as such but also totally tainted with 3rd Reich background. Wikipedia.de[^] says that the sanskrit word is indeed Swastika: Sanskrit: ????????, m., svastika, „Glücksbringer“
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighistI noticed CP screwed up the Devanagari characters, but hopefully the notification email should render it correctly.
Cheers, Vikram.
The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.
-
peterchen wrote:
leaky abstractions [^]
That's quite a 'leaky' link!
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
Ech, I'm out of people to blame for today, here's what I wanted to link to: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/LeakyAbstractions.html[^]
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist -
Enough already! :) I really am getting frustrated with a lot of people that talk crap on VB when they couldn't give you one reason why it's bad. Personally, I use both C# and VB at work and can design and implement the exact same application using either. You can even use Ildasm to verify that you've created the same application. I understand that there are things you can do in VB that completely violate a number of OO concepts, but if you don't use these methods, what's the harm in hacking a out a few lines of VB?
The best proof that VB sucks is the VB users' need to justify VB's existence and prove its adequacy! You never hear a C programmer do that, do you?
To hell with circumstances; I create opportunities.