A Google rival from ex-Googlers

Ravi Bhavnani

Former Employees of Google Prepare Rival Search Engine[^] /ravi

My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

Dirk Higbee

I've seen many search engines fall by the way side over the years and I used to compare 4-5 at the same time just to see what results I would get. I finally found that if Yahoo doesn't give me what I want I use Google. I don't think $33 million and 30 employees is enough to compete.

Don't take any wooden nickels.

eyeseetee

Yeah just seen it: instantly dislike the black home page Not enough search results per page Like the idea of images, brigtens it up a bit Still its the results that matter and are they any better then google... PS not sure on the name either :)

leppie

WTF?[^] ( @ 'My success in scientology' image )

xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

leppie

.netman wrote:

Like the idea of images, brigtens it up a bit

If only the had some correct images...

xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

snorkie

Just tried it and I'm not a fan. Used several search terms that return quality results in Google, and it had no hits. Hogan

phannon86

Yea noticed it this morning, it's been "slashdotted" for a little while today too. So... it indexes many more pages than Google, great... now how about you make the results relevant, and the images match up...

He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man

Bassam Abdul Baki

You beat me to it. My first test is usually to search myself. I must say, I'm impressed by the format.

There are ll kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who understand Roman numerals. Web - Blog - RSS - Ma

Simon P Stevens

Rubbish. My test search: "MSDN console writeline" Google - 614,000 results. First one is the MSDN page for the system.console.writeline method. Cuil - We didn’t find any results for “MSDN console writeline”!! :wtf: Seriously! None! Nothing! Not a single mention of any of those words on all 121,617,892,992 pages! They are clearly indexing 121,617,892,992 pages I care nothing about. [Edit: Then: "We’ll be back soon... Due to overwhelming interest, our Cuil servers are running a bit hot right now. The search engine is momentarily unavailable as we add more capacity. Thanks for your patience." - Well don't spend too much on those servers, as we'll be gone soon :laugh: ]

Simon

modified on Monday, July 28, 2008 9:22 AM

Simon Capewell

And our survey says 'whaaaah waaaaah' when it comes to technical material. Try searching for linq datacontext. The columns aren't very usable as you can't just read down the page. You can try to read across, but the results aren't tabular, so they're not quite lined up in rows. The categories box fools the eye into thinking the third column is a load of Google adverts too!

daniilzol

First impressions are negative, and most are covered already by previous posters. 1. Black page? I strongly suspect there were teenagers involved in design. 2. Searched for "wd10eacs 00D6B0", 0 results returned, whereas with google I get one or two relevant links. 3. No "cached" version of the search result. 4. Awkward results layout which is hard to scan quickly. 5. Plain Jane. No shopping, maps, news, finance functionality. So far I'm not impressed.

Marc Clifton

Now, along with her husband, Tom Costello, and a few other Google alumni, she is trying to upstage her former employer. Man, I think that's the dumbest thing to do--go into competition with your former employer. Even if you think your non-compete (and so forth) agreement has expired, you're still setting yourself up to be killed just on the cost of fighting the lawsuit, regardless if you win in the end. Marc

Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

scottgp

My co-worker and I were discussing it this morning. I tried a few searches, and I hope they're not considering themselves ready for prime-time. Several simple searches returned no hits, whereas thousands were returned by other search tools. Also, it was weird - a couple would be returned on the first page, then one or two on the next page, then five on the third. No rhyme or reason to it. I also can't stand the full black page. Scott

Chris Maunder

CodeProject is a typo[^] a) Trying to be cool is so lame. Cuil? Just trying too hard b) If you're going to challenge an existing system then you at least need to look like you have a better product.

cheers, Chris Maunder

CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

eyeseetee

strange I just searched for codeproject and found results... Results

Chris Maunder

I repeated the search and it's showing there's 85K results but just hanging and not showing any actual results. Same result if I hit Refresh. Google = 5.5 million and instant page load Cuil = 85K and the page doesn't load. Round 2: Google.

cheers, Chris Maunder

CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

Brady Kelly

:laugh: So, you must be SA's highest paid developer to have any success in Scientology. ;P

Unscrambling Eggs: Decompiling ASP.NET

Oakman

CodeProject = no results codeproject = 85,465 results and (for me) fast load Definitely not ready for prime time - or drive time, either. edit Tried to demonstrate the sensitivity to capital letters later and could not do so.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

modified on Monday, July 28, 2008 12:39 PM

Yusuf

like many, initial impression not that great. I think the recipe for success are, simplicity, speed and relevancy, which I did not notice in my first trial

Yusuf

John M Drescher

They better change that URL. I mixed up the l and i in their URL and got porn. Hopefully I do not get my network security's attention...

John