Is it true about Chrome?
-
Paul Watson wrote:
I kept my reply to your ignorant comment civil, please keep your's.
Do yourself a favour: pull the stick out of your arse you pompous, self righteous wanker.
Winner of the 2008 Man Most Likely To Tell You To Sod Off Award
wow! that was totally out of line :suss:
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
-
Important for web-apps. More than a few people these days spend a lot of time in their browser using web-apps. Not just the web 2.0 crowd but intranet and enterprise web-apps too. Faster, more robust JavaScript processes will help people get work done.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
i'm doing some siebel crm on demand stuff for a fortune 100 and the pages are slow as molasses ... anything to speed up the data connections would be great :)
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
-
Bigger bars are better or worse? (Is there an article detailing what was actually tested)
'--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd
-
Paul Watson wrote:
I kept my reply to your ignorant comment civil, please keep your's.
Do yourself a favour: pull the stick out of your arse you pompous, self righteous wanker.
Winner of the 2008 Man Most Likely To Tell You To Sod Off Award
-
That's Googles own test suite, they probably used it to optimize V8 (Chrome's JavaScript engine). Other benchmarks have other results... but V8 is pretty good. Here are some results I found on the web for the SunSpider benchmark:
Browser time in ms
IE 7.0 21273
IE 8.0 Beta 2 15212,8
FF 3.0.1 2989,4
FF 3.1 Alpha 2852,2
FF 3.1 Pre-Beta 1524
Opera 9.52 3977,2
Google Chrome 0.2 1635,2Or just try it yourself[^] EDIT: and here's another benchmark: http://dromaeo.com/[^]
Daniel Grunwald wrote:
they probably used it to optimize V8 (Chrome's JavaScript engine)
In my slightly blurry eyed monday morning pre coffee state I read that as "they probably used it to optimize VB (Chrome's JavaScript engine)" and for a moment a small piece of me died! Russell
-
Yes, that's right. google are marketing their new browser. Only, when they do it, I presume it's not evil.
Christian Graus No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.
Christian Graus wrote:
Yes, that's right. google are marketing their new browser. Only, when they do it, I presume it's not evil.
It did start off evil with their "Everything you submit via Chrome belongs to us" EULA: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_sucks/[^] But they later changed it, so a little less evil now.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
Amusingly, you're using a web app to discuss your feelings on the subject.
When does a web site become a web application?
-
Christian Graus wrote:
Amusingly, you're using a web app to discuss your feelings on the subject.
When does a web site become a web application?
-
Christian Graus wrote:
Amusingly, you're using a web app to discuss your feelings on the subject.
When does a web site become a web application?
-
Christian Graus wrote:
Yes, that's right. google are marketing their new browser. Only, when they do it, I presume it's not evil.
It did start off evil with their "Everything you submit via Chrome belongs to us" EULA: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_sucks/[^] But they later changed it, so a little less evil now.
They changed this part of the EULA. So now it's "not evil".
-
Paul Watson wrote:
I kept my reply to your ignorant comment civil, please keep your's.
Do yourself a favour: pull the stick out of your arse you pompous, self righteous wanker.
Winner of the 2008 Man Most Likely To Tell You To Sod Off Award
"pompous, self righteous wanker" Looks like you're looking in the mirror.
'Howard
-
I'm surprised to see Opera sat at the bottom of all these benchmarks. It seems like the fastest browser in practice. What is sure, is that unless every browser offers fast Javascript and everyone uses these browsers, we're still going to be constrained by the lowest common denominator. IE6 then.
Matt Dockerty
-
Paul Watson wrote:
I kept my reply to your ignorant comment civil, please keep your's.
Do yourself a favour: pull the stick out of your arse you pompous, self righteous wanker.
Winner of the 2008 Man Most Likely To Tell You To Sod Off Award
Who are you and what have you done to Martin?
-
"pompous, self righteous wanker" Looks like you're looking in the mirror.
'Howard
I wonder if he realised that this forum uses javascript (the drop down menus, form validation etc)? I have looked at chrome and I cant really see much difference. I am concerned about the browser's security however. Are there any comparison sites about yet? :confused:
**IA Computing Ltd - Neonlight
** -
I wonder if he realised that this forum uses javascript (the drop down menus, form validation etc)? I have looked at chrome and I cant really see much difference. I am concerned about the browser's security however. Are there any comparison sites about yet? :confused:
**IA Computing Ltd - Neonlight
**I looked at Chrome too. The only reason I could see for its existence is to extend the reach of Google At present they can only collect data when we use their sites. If they own the browser then they can collect data on EVERY site you visit.
'Howard
-
I looked at Chrome too. The only reason I could see for its existence is to extend the reach of Google At present they can only collect data when we use their sites. If they own the browser then they can collect data on EVERY site you visit.
'Howard
Judging by the recent argument they had over personal data in youtube. I am a little more comfortable with them holding information on what I do online. Doesn't Google already retain information based on searches, referrers and IP addresses? Apparently there are programs you can install that run random searches to anonymize your browsing habits? is such a thing available for chrome. I've forgotten what it was called.
**IA Computing Ltd - Neonlight
** -
Bigger bars are better or worse? (Is there an article detailing what was actually tested)
'--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd
-
I kept my reply to your ignorant comment civil, please keep your's.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
-
If the performance is that much better, it doesn't show up in casual use. I've been using Chrome since they made it available last week. I'm a Gmail user, and I do my fair share of surfing. It isn't much faster, if at all. The feature set is nice, but I'm already hankering for a couple of Firefox extensions that aren't here for Chrome yet. Foxmarks chief among them. I have had significant trouble viewing Flash video. Sometimes it just hangs the browser and doesn't work. I've seen numerous error messages about the Flash plugin having crashed. BTW, I'm using a cable modem that peaks at about 4MBit/sec (on a good day!) and have been running Chrome on both a Vista as well as an XP laptop. The Vista machine is a Compaq 8510W with the Intel Centrino and 4GB of Ram. So I'm fairly well equipped as far as hardware and connectivity go.
-
I wonder if he realised that this forum uses javascript (the drop down menus, form validation etc)? I have looked at chrome and I cant really see much difference. I am concerned about the browser's security however. Are there any comparison sites about yet? :confused:
**IA Computing Ltd - Neonlight
**Sweet: "Message automatically removed" I guess he got tagged as Abuse enough to hit the automated delete
'Howard
