An ethical question...
-
I support, to the death, your right to stay stupid stuff, as does that killing machine. Now please take your stupid political statements out of the lounge.
Silver member by constant and unflinching longevity.
it's not a political statement, nor is it stupid. it's just a fact. also, i was pointing out an inconsistency in OP comment. oh, and BTW, I fully support having a military.
modified on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:25 PM
-
It's not encrypted or compressed. Come on, it should be easy.
10110011001111101010101000001000001101001010001010100000100000101000001000111100010110001011001011
-
No, but there's an idea ;)
print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?
"What do you have for me this time, Q?" "Well Bond, it's a Pornographic Spy Camera with a built in Rocket Launcher that looks like a key fob ... don't press that!" "One thrust of my rocket always did cause an explosion" "Do be carefull where you aim that thing, Bond"
10110011001111101010101000001000001101001010001010100000100000101000001000111100010110001011001011
-
it's not a political statement, nor is it stupid. it's just a fact. also, i was pointing out an inconsistency in OP comment. oh, and BTW, I fully support having a military.
modified on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:25 PM
It is the government freedom machine. It brought freedom to a large part of Europe, as well as Iraq. This is not a political statement, it's just a fact. Do you think I'm being political with that statement? There was no inconsistency in his post: He said that he had sold out, he showed how he had. :( Than he said that the only thing he would not do for a living was any line of work that killed people. Do you think that means even if it would keep himself (or others) free, or save lives? Edit - Sorry. I stand behind what I said, but I took a bad approach to saying it. /Edit
Silver member by constant and unflinching longevity.
-
"What do you have for me this time, Q?" "Well Bond, it's a Pornographic Spy Camera with a built in Rocket Launcher that looks like a key fob ... don't press that!" "One thrust of my rocket always did cause an explosion" "Do be carefull where you aim that thing, Bond"
10110011001111101010101000001000001101001010001010100000100000101000001000111100010110001011001011
:D
print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?
-
It is the government freedom machine. It brought freedom to a large part of Europe, as well as Iraq. This is not a political statement, it's just a fact. Do you think I'm being political with that statement? There was no inconsistency in his post: He said that he had sold out, he showed how he had. :( Than he said that the only thing he would not do for a living was any line of work that killed people. Do you think that means even if it would keep himself (or others) free, or save lives? Edit - Sorry. I stand behind what I said, but I took a bad approach to saying it. /Edit
Silver member by constant and unflinching longevity.
RichardM1 wrote:
Do you think that means even if it would keep himself (or others) free, or save lives?
frankly don't know. i was also being sarcastic, to make a point. like i said, i fully support having a military. now please drop it.
-
Or rather a question about your ethics. Do you have a particularly strong moral stance which dictates which industries, no matter what the reward, you will and won't work in? For example, in my time I've worked in (amongst other things) tobacco and gaming - two industries which a lot of people find highly objectional - which I had no problem with morally and was ultimately very comfortable with. However, I would not want to be involved with a company that manufactures or supplies arms and armaments or a company that specialises in the production of films of dubious artistic merit. There's my, slightly morally ambiguous, line. To broaden the scope a little, are there any tasks that your current employer could set that would see you quit? Example: if you were asked to develop a secret program to spy on your user's activities (effectively spy-ware whose results would be for the sole consumption of your employer) would you be happy to do it, or would you feel compelled to find employment elsewhere?
print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?
I would refuse any incentive to intentionally harm an animal. So you'd never see me on a whaling ship, working in an animal research lab, or clear-cutting any amount of rain forest. But I do eat meat, and I would freely accept medicines that are tested on animals, so I guess I'm a bit of a hypocrite. However, in this way, so are a lot of other people.
-
It is the government freedom machine. It brought freedom to a large part of Europe, as well as Iraq. This is not a political statement, it's just a fact. Do you think I'm being political with that statement? There was no inconsistency in his post: He said that he had sold out, he showed how he had. :( Than he said that the only thing he would not do for a living was any line of work that killed people. Do you think that means even if it would keep himself (or others) free, or save lives? Edit - Sorry. I stand behind what I said, but I took a bad approach to saying it. /Edit
Silver member by constant and unflinching longevity.
Hey, I like you, man. Finally a voice of reason and reality. People's words say that America is evil, but their feet say that there's no place on Earth they would rather be.
-
Tobacco kills tens of thousands a year in the UK. More than any arms manufacturer. 'nuff said.
Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.
So you're not real big on personal freedom, then, huh? You favor a nanny state?
-
martin_hughes wrote:
Do you have a particularly strong moral stance which dictates which industries, no matter what the reward, you will and won't work in?
Yes. I think most people have some kind of scruples where they would turn down a job no matter the monies.
martin_hughes wrote:
To broaden the scope a little, are there any tasks that your current employer could set that would see you quit?
Anything that would require me to lie, cheat or steal; and killing is completely out of the question, unless it's a bug. I kill bugs everyday.
Douglas Troy wrote:
Anything that would require me to lie, cheat or steal;
So that pretty much rules out being a used car salesman, or a politician. :-D
-
So you're not real big on personal freedom, then, huh? You favor a nanny state?
If I'm not for one extreme then I must be for the opposite extreme? Tsk tsk.
Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.
-
bulg wrote:
Europe-countries have militaries?
Sure, they have militaries, but they are purely ceremonial.
-
If I'm not for one extreme then I must be for the opposite extreme? Tsk tsk.
Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.
Yeah, sorry. Never mind.
-
then you pretty much shouldn't work because your tax dollars go to support the gov't killing machine.
I just want to clarify. I don't have a problem with our military. I gladly pay my taxes even though the money is used to buy weapons. I love America and I am damn proud of our military. I just don't want to work for a company that profits by making arms that kill people. I would just rather someone else do that. Also, even though corporations are mostly evil. I'd rather be in a country run by corporations than live in some Fascist state. Business is business but corporations could make decisions with a conscience and sometimes do what is right even if it is not always the most profitable. Honestly, I would much prefer a completely free market to what we have now. It is just sickening to see my government giving away out tax dollars to big banks because they screwed up.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
-
I just want to clarify. I don't have a problem with our military. I gladly pay my taxes even though the money is used to buy weapons. I love America and I am damn proud of our military. I just don't want to work for a company that profits by making arms that kill people. I would just rather someone else do that. Also, even though corporations are mostly evil. I'd rather be in a country run by corporations than live in some Fascist state. Business is business but corporations could make decisions with a conscience and sometimes do what is right even if it is not always the most profitable. Honestly, I would much prefer a completely free market to what we have now. It is just sickening to see my government giving away out tax dollars to big banks because they screwed up.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
"Also, even though corporations are mostly evil" bigot. ;) Do you even know what you just said?
Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Hurtling toward a government of the stupid, by the stupid, for the stupid we go. —Michelle Malkin This crap sandwich is all yours.... 2009 "Stimulus Bill"
-
Douglas Troy wrote:
Anything that would require me to lie, cheat or steal;
So that pretty much rules out being a used car salesman, or a politician. :-D
-
Yes, OK. But what happens when they pass a law that you don't agree with, or that breaks your moral code?
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
-
If I'm not for one extreme then I must be for the opposite extreme? Tsk tsk.
Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.
leave im be he's used to arguing with his wife - Wife - do you like this new dress RA distractedly - hhmmm yeah I gues so wife shrilly - so you think I'm fat... Could not resist it's such a cliche and I hear it all the time.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
Or rather a question about your ethics. Do you have a particularly strong moral stance which dictates which industries, no matter what the reward, you will and won't work in? For example, in my time I've worked in (amongst other things) tobacco and gaming - two industries which a lot of people find highly objectional - which I had no problem with morally and was ultimately very comfortable with. However, I would not want to be involved with a company that manufactures or supplies arms and armaments or a company that specialises in the production of films of dubious artistic merit. There's my, slightly morally ambiguous, line. To broaden the scope a little, are there any tasks that your current employer could set that would see you quit? Example: if you were asked to develop a secret program to spy on your user's activities (effectively spy-ware whose results would be for the sole consumption of your employer) would you be happy to do it, or would you feel compelled to find employment elsewhere?
print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?
martin_hughes wrote:
I would not want to be involved with a company that manufactures or supplies arms and armaments or a company that specialises in the production of films of dubious artistic merit.
Been there, done that. When my ex-wife found out that I was helping to design communication satellites, she got on my case that satellites interfere with the spiritual forces streaming toward the earth. Ex. So, the first question is, do you make your choices based on someone else's sense of morals/ethics or your own? If by someone else's, well, that seems just plain wrong. If your own, you're obviously going to offend someone elses. The decision (which someone will of course disagree with) that I made is that if I don't do the work, someone else will, and I know that I can do a good job at it, so I'd rather be the one. And then I take the money and launder it, if you will, in ways that express my morality/ethics. For example, the adult entertainment industry has helped pay my son's tuition at a Waldorf school for many years. And the thing that surprises me the most is that, no matter what industry I've worked in, there are intelligent and caring people that are grappling with that issue as well. That surprises me all the time. I guess I haven't learned not to pre-judge the people just because of what they do. I've met "entertainers" that are putting themselves through college. I've met club owners that are deeply affected by how a girl can make $2000 a night at one of these clubs (mind you, we're talking legal activities) and the next morning she needs to borrow some money because she's blown it all on drugs that night. Similarly, when I did some military work, I was surprised that a lot of the smart people were there because, while they may have disagreed with the work, they felt they could be an influence in their position to make the world better. I for one was delighted when Congress cancelled the MX Missile Train program! The point I guess I'm trying to make is that it's one thing to look at morality/ethics abstractly from 30,000 feet, and it's another thing when you really get to know the people. Marc
-
lawyer
Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Hurtling toward a government of the stupid, by the stupid, for the stupid we go. —Michelle Malkin This crap sandwich is all yours.... 2009 "Stimulus Bill"
Well that's a good one. There's a guy on the radio who says that a lawyer is a "liar for hire."
