How much RAM you have?
-
Yeppers. I've got 6 RAM slots. Currently, only 2 of them are filled with 2 sticks of 2GB. Theoretically, then, I can load it up with 12GB. (Or if I was made of money, I could buy 6 sticks of 4GB each, bringing me up to 24GB!)
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
What is your motherboard? While 24GB will fit, the chipset will definately not see that much.
-
What is your motherboard? While 24GB will fit, the chipset will definately not see that much.
That's ok, I'm not actually interested in loading it up with 24. 12, maybe. We'll see.
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
-
That's ok, I'm not actually interested in loading it up with 24. 12, maybe. We'll see.
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
I do not know of a single chipset that will accept that much RAM. What is your motherboard?
-
leppie wrote:
Just imagine how snappy everything will be when Windows does not need to ever go to the swap file!
That raises an interesting question I've been thinking about for a while. Given the amount of RAM that a lot of people have, what would happen if you just set the Swap file size to 0? Does Windows run faster? Will it even let you do this?
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh
I did that once on a 1 GB with windows XP PC, It runs a little faster but for some reason some games won't run or crash on certain instances, so I wouldn't recommend doing that.
There are 10 kinds of people: those who know binary code and those who don't.
-
So I posted on CP last week about my Vista machine blue screening. It came down to a memory error. Someone suggested blowing the dust out of the RAM slots and swapping the 2 sticks. Good news: it seemed to work! I've been running for 2 days now without any blue screens, and the memory error detection tool in Vista can't find any errors. Wahooo! But it got me thinking: I'm running x64 with 4GB of RAM (2 sticks of 2GB each). I've got 6 slots for RAM, so I could theoretically load it up with 12 GB if I bought the cheap 2GB sticks. Is 12 gigs of RAM overkill? How much RAM do you guys have for your dev machines at home?
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
-
Falcon_007 wrote:
6GB so far and another 6GB coming this next week
Lucky dog!
Falcon_007 wrote:
the only thing i quite don't get is that the RAM being "used" is around 50% without any open program, that's obviously 3GB in apparently nothing
See Jeff Atwood's excellent Why Does Vista Use All My Memory?[^]
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
Well thanks for the info! :thumbsup: the bad part about this is that, this is my Gaming machine so that superfecth is a treat to me :( , my dev machine is a VM with XP within this PC
-
So I posted on CP last week about my Vista machine blue screening. It came down to a memory error. Someone suggested blowing the dust out of the RAM slots and swapping the 2 sticks. Good news: it seemed to work! I've been running for 2 days now without any blue screens, and the memory error detection tool in Vista can't find any errors. Wahooo! But it got me thinking: I'm running x64 with 4GB of RAM (2 sticks of 2GB each). I've got 6 slots for RAM, so I could theoretically load it up with 12 GB if I bought the cheap 2GB sticks. Is 12 gigs of RAM overkill? How much RAM do you guys have for your dev machines at home?
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
I've got 3 gigs with an AMD dual core/Windows Vista. Only time I've had a problem is when I get too many large images open in Adesign. Adesign will slow to a crawl because it has unlimited Undo/Redo. It's a bit of a memory hog.
-
So I posted on CP last week about my Vista machine blue screening. It came down to a memory error. Someone suggested blowing the dust out of the RAM slots and swapping the 2 sticks. Good news: it seemed to work! I've been running for 2 days now without any blue screens, and the memory error detection tool in Vista can't find any errors. Wahooo! But it got me thinking: I'm running x64 with 4GB of RAM (2 sticks of 2GB each). I've got 6 slots for RAM, so I could theoretically load it up with 12 GB if I bought the cheap 2GB sticks. Is 12 gigs of RAM overkill? How much RAM do you guys have for your dev machines at home?
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
Tom's Hardware did an article on this a while ago: Do You Really Need More Than 6 GB Of RAM? . They found that for pretty much everything they tested for, there was almost no appreciable difference between 3GB and anything more than that. I suppose I could see adding a couple extra GB for a server, or if you're going to be using virtual machines a lot, but 12GB certainly seems like overkill to me. My desktop and laptop both have 3GB at the moment, and to be honest, I rarely ran out even when my desktop only had 1GB (though to be fair, I never really used Vista). 3GB is plenty for me for the time being.
-
Judah Himango wrote:
Is 12 gigs of RAM overkill?
Of course not :) Just imagine how snappy everything will be when Windows does not need to ever go to the swap file!
Judah Himango wrote:
How much RAM do you guys have for your dev machines at home?
Maxed on my 32-bit Vista :(
xacc.ide
IronScheme - 1.0 beta 3 - out now!
((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))I just finished building a new home workstation with a Core i7 920 and 12GB RAM on Win7 RC x64. I'm planning to be running multiple VMs on it, so I figured the RAM would be worth it, especially since it was as cheap as it will probably ever be. About 200 bucks for 12GB.
-
leppie wrote:
Just imagine how snappy everything will be when Windows does not need to ever go to the swap file!
That raises an interesting question I've been thinking about for a while. Given the amount of RAM that a lot of people have, what would happen if you just set the Swap file size to 0? Does Windows run faster? Will it even let you do this?
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh
-
So I posted on CP last week about my Vista machine blue screening. It came down to a memory error. Someone suggested blowing the dust out of the RAM slots and swapping the 2 sticks. Good news: it seemed to work! I've been running for 2 days now without any blue screens, and the memory error detection tool in Vista can't find any errors. Wahooo! But it got me thinking: I'm running x64 with 4GB of RAM (2 sticks of 2GB each). I've got 6 slots for RAM, so I could theoretically load it up with 12 GB if I bought the cheap 2GB sticks. Is 12 gigs of RAM overkill? How much RAM do you guys have for your dev machines at home?
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
4 GB for my gaming desktop, 2 GB for my regular desktop, 2 GB for my laptop, and 1 GB for my old gaming desktop. I've got memory of all types since I bought my first computer: SDRAM, DDR SDRAM, DDR2 SDRAM, and I might get a new one with 16 GB DDR3 RAM.
My GUID: ca2262a7-0026-4830-a0b3-fe5d66c4eb1d :) Now I can Google this value and find all my Code Project posts!
-
DavidCrow wrote:
Judah Himango wrote: Is 12 gigs of RAM overkill? Can Vista even use that much? See here.
The better x64 versions can. Basic does 8gb; Premium 16gb; Business, Enterprise, and Ultimate all support 128gb. Server08 can support upto 2TB of ram. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-Vista-Maximum-Supported-RAM-44487.shtml[^] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/cc196364.aspx[^]
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
-
So I posted on CP last week about my Vista machine blue screening. It came down to a memory error. Someone suggested blowing the dust out of the RAM slots and swapping the 2 sticks. Good news: it seemed to work! I've been running for 2 days now without any blue screens, and the memory error detection tool in Vista can't find any errors. Wahooo! But it got me thinking: I'm running x64 with 4GB of RAM (2 sticks of 2GB each). I've got 6 slots for RAM, so I could theoretically load it up with 12 GB if I bought the cheap 2GB sticks. Is 12 gigs of RAM overkill? How much RAM do you guys have for your dev machines at home?
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
I'm actually working on 64bit and 4GB of ram, is working fine with Visual Studio 2004 64-bit, and visual Studio 2008 64-bit, and SQL-Server 2005/2008 64-bit, with no problems at all. It seesm the future of the 64bit is not bad after all, and the things are really so fast on my machine even with the IE64-bit. I suggest for anyone who's doing lot's of development like me should be using 64-bit machines. Thanks, Bryan Soliman
-
So I posted on CP last week about my Vista machine blue screening. It came down to a memory error. Someone suggested blowing the dust out of the RAM slots and swapping the 2 sticks. Good news: it seemed to work! I've been running for 2 days now without any blue screens, and the memory error detection tool in Vista can't find any errors. Wahooo! But it got me thinking: I'm running x64 with 4GB of RAM (2 sticks of 2GB each). I've got 6 slots for RAM, so I could theoretically load it up with 12 GB if I bought the cheap 2GB sticks. Is 12 gigs of RAM overkill? How much RAM do you guys have for your dev machines at home?
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango
I'm using Windows Vista + Visual Studio 2008 and I have 2 GB of RAM both on my PC and on my laptop. I find it's more than enough.
Vladovsoft
Software products for fitness centers, health clubs, hotels, storehouses and shops. -
leppie wrote:
Just imagine how snappy everything will be when Windows does not need to ever go to the swap file!
That raises an interesting question I've been thinking about for a while. Given the amount of RAM that a lot of people have, what would happen if you just set the Swap file size to 0? Does Windows run faster? Will it even let you do this?
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh
You could do this even in Windows NT 4.0, but in my experience, you will have occasional stability problems. Every so often, some system process associated with the kernel will expect that there is a swap file and try to reference it. When it happens, it results in a kernel crash (bsod). I'm sure there are some legacy code places (bugs) in Windows that still expect a swap file.